Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature vs nurture debate answered
Nature vs Nurture debate
Nature vs Nurture debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nature vs nurture debate answered
“Practice makes perfect” is a very popular phrase. One has to work hard in order to be the best; the best pianist, the best gymnast, the best artist. Zach Hambrick, however, does not agree with that popular phrase. In Maria Konnikova’s article Practice Doesn’t Make Practice, she writes about how Hambrick decided to test to see if practice really does make perfect or if it is one’s DNA that actually does it. Konnikova, a psychologist and writer, takes her readers through Hambrick’s process of researching whether practice really does make perfect. Hambrick first ran into questioning this popular phrase when he had the dream of becoming a professional golfer. He learned quickly he was not as good as the other golfers so he practiced and practiced. …show more content…
effort” (Konnikova). Hambrick is not the only one to look into answering this question. Way before him, there was Francis Galton who positioned that genius runs in the family. His exact view does not exist today due to how extreme is was, but it does guide modern research. Recent studies show that training is everything and genetics does not matter with an exception of body size and height. Ericcson told Konnikova, “He told me he had yet to encounter someone presenting him with evidence that anything other than practice matters. (He did, in a later conversation, add that the age at which one begins practicing can make a difference in someone’s achievement level)” (Konnikova). Hambrick, on the other hand, still did not accept that and continued to research how important practice is to an individual. He concluded, “People do have natural ceilings to their talent in any given …show more content…
“We cannot predict with accuracy who will become élite in a given field, but we know that genes and environment matter and that we all have different natural peaks that we can reach through application and training.” To lead her readers to this conclusion, she took her readers through the research process and the different sides of the debate. She skillfully write in an orderly fashion making it easy to follow and to understand what her intent was. Her intended audience would be athletes, musicians, and anyone interested in achieving their highest potential. Also, anyone interested in the old debate of nature vs nurture would also be interested in reading this article since she uses it in order to discover if practice makes perfect. Instead of it being one or the other, the conclusion came to be, that both nature and nurture plays a role in a person’s ability to reach his greatest
Plucker, J. A., & Barab, S. A. (2005). The importance of contexts in theories of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 201-216). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Natural talent doesn’t lead the person to success, but it’s the combination of nurturing and favorable events that will make the him/her “successful”.
Plucker, J. A., & Barab, S. A. (2005). The importance of contexts in theories of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 201-216). New York: Cambridge University Press.
The theory that the more one practices the better one becomes. To follow the dream of excellence you must practice your assignment for a total of 10,000 hours or more. “The students who would end up the best in their class began to practice more than everyone else: six hours a week by age nine, eight hours a week by age twelve, sixteen hours by age fourteen, and up and up, until the age of twenty they were practicing well over thirty hours a week” (39) in a sense this excerpt confirms what society has told people for years, that practice makes perfect. Of course some people are born with raw talent, however how does one expect to improve their abilities if they do not rehearse. Anyone can be mediocre without practice, but in order to make it in the big shots one must give their one hundred and ten percent to beat out the competition. It’s all about how one distinguishes themself from another and the only way to do that is to show off that skill that has been practiced repeatedly. Preferably 10,000 hours
We see that in the reading “Mundanity of Excellence,” by Daniel F Chambliss, the focus is on nature of excellence as it pertains to Olympic swimming. Mr. Chambliss supplies the reader with his experience and sociological approach to his theory that “talent is useless.” I will now provide you with a brief commentary on how sociology relates to developing human talent. It is perceived that one’s natural goal is to accomplish perfection in a “talent” or gift. This ranges from numerous types of talents whether it is sports, entertainment, acting, or even a technical skill. In a sociologist way of thinking we realize that excellence is not only achieved by quantitative or qualitative improvements, it encompasses several factors. I want to
I’ve learned that it’s better to think out of the box than always stick to the same routine. You can compete in an ever-changing marketplace if you’re always doing the exact same thing. Sometimes you have to let go of what’s not working instead of trying to fix it, as not everything and everyone are fixable. More importantly this case study affirmed that staying true to what you believe in, allowing your natural abilities to shine, and caring about the overall welfare of all parties involved are at the core of being a great
The example of an athlete is adapted to clarify this belief. If one wants to be a star athlete, then it is important for one to train properly and work hard before the event. Supposing that one does not prepare for the event, then the expectation sh...
The luck of having talent is not enough; one must also have a talent for luck. -- Hector Berlioz
Tugend, Alina. "For the Best of the Best, Determination Outweighs Nature and Nurture." New York Times 10 Apr. 2010, New York ed.: B6. Print.
Sports specialization among young people is when a child or teenager trains for and competes in only one sport. They work extremely hard year-round in order to become well-rounded in every aspect of the game. They make sacrifices and put their health in jeopardy in order to become the ultimate participant in their sport. One of the many young athletes who is only participating in and focusing on one sport is fifteen-year-old OJ Mayo from Cincinnati, Ohio. He is the young talented athlete who is predicted to be the next LeBron James in the National Basketball Association (NBA). This young athlete provides evidence of striving for perfection in this single sport when reviewing his daily schedule versus that of his siblings. He says, “The other kids go home and sleep. I come back to the gym” (Thompson, 2004). He is obviously putting forth a lot of effort in his sport to become successful at an early age.
I noticed from all the capable people I know that their skills were acquired through hard work, their passion for what they do, and years of experience in their trade or profession. I can 't think of anyone who is born with skills. If you come across people who achieved certain results due to natural ability than hard work, there 's a good chance that hard work has been invested. For example, when I was in school, there were students who seem to breeze through tests and get great results. What a lot of people don 't know is that behind the great results were extra hours spent on self-studying and hours of private tuition that their parents put them through. Another example: when I worked in a research firm, there were people who stood out above others. These were the same people who invested extra time to get their skills right.
1998 Henry B. & Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on talent development, Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press. 219-227.
Scientists and biologist have argued the Nature versus Nurture debate for decades. This debate is about the degree to which our environment and heredity, affects our behavior and developmental stages. According to this debate, nature can be described as, the behavior of a person is occurring because of their genetic makeup. Since the behavior of a person is due to their genetic makeup, then, it (nature) should also influence a person’s growth and development for the duration of their life. However, the nurture side of the debate says, the cause for an individual’s behavior is because of environmental factors. This would mean that the influence from our family (immediate and extended), friends and other individuals would mold our behavior. Ultimately, no one knows if nature or nurture affects behavior more; or if it is a combination of both nature and nurture dictating an individual’s behavior; or if neither nature nor nurture affects a person’s behavior. This paper will examine the nature versus nurture debate through the topics of violence, intelligence and economics, and sports.
Angela, a female counterpart of Isaac, fondly expressed, “Come, visit my house or say a chunk of books and you will know whether or not athletes study!” A well-skilled body with ill mindset can never cross the finishing line in this life full of obstacles. One can only succeed if and only if both these factors are well-balanced and taken care
The first part of the “Ten Thousand Hour” rule integrates practice. Practicing a certain skill is essential to the ten thousand hour rule. If people expect to have success without practicing, they are not going to get anywhere. It takes days, hours, and years of practice to master something. A perfect example about hours of practice would be Michael Jordan. Michael Jordan spent countless hours on and off the court to improve his basketball game. Without those hours, his career would have never been as successful as it was. In his book Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell perfectly states what practice is about by saying “Practice isn't the thing you do once you're good It's the thing you do that makes you good” (Gladwell 42). Gladwell is corr...