Jorge Luis Borges Essay

972 Words2 Pages

Jorge Luis Borges born in Buenos Aires on August 24, 1899, and he was an Argentine journalist, author and poet. Through his works, he was considered as a prominent writer in world literature of 20th century. “Reading the work of Jorge Luis Borges for the first time is like discovering a new letter in the alphabet, or a new note in the musical scale.” (Ciabattari, 2014). One of his friends Adolfo Bioy Casares, called his works “halfway houses between an essay and a story”. The way Borges has used private jokes, labyrinths, mirrors, chess games and detective stories, creates a complex intellectual landscape with a philosophical attitude with clear and ironic undertones. One of the most interesting characteristics of his writing is that he portrays …show more content…

He is scared of extinct as a person in order for his writing to live. In the story we can observe that The narrator shows interest to things like hourglasses, maps, and eighteenth-century typefaces but Borges uses those things as equipments of an actor. Moreover, the narrator says that he lives in order for Borges to write. He also added that the he writing is the justification for his being alive. The relationship between the two halves of Borges is highly conflicting and it is like a parasite is consuming its host of any remaining worth before get rid of it. On the other hand, the narrator desires not to be forgotten and he tries to stop Borges from writing and be known as an individual but he fails to do so. When he tried to leave behind the topics he wrote of, Borges starting writing about new ones. This signals that the inescapable urge that Borges feels to write, no matter the cost. At the end we can see that how afraid the narrator is of losing himself to Borges. He fails to express whether these are his actual feelings and ideas or if the writer inside of him is twisted and magnifying all the things. Basically, the narrator desires to live his own life being free from the persuasion of …show more content…

The world wants to remember the works of a person and the world appreciates the glorious deeds and actions of a person but not the person. Sooner or later everyone has to taste the death. The person is temporay but his works will be there forever. People still talks and appreciate the works of Homar, Shakespeare , they praises the bravery of Napoleon, Alexander but people couldn’t save them as a person. Eventually, those great figures has to leave the earth. Maybe they had a inner self like the ‘Narrator’ and he didn’t wanted all those glory, bravely, appreciation .All he want to be himself not someone he pretends to be. In “Borges and I” the narrator didn’t want the fame, popularity, charm like ‘the other’ Borges has. The narrator wanted Borges to focus on himself. Moreover, the narrator makes the connection between himself and Borges through the literature that Borges writes. Although the narrator says that the "literature justifies" him, he also reports that the "pages cannot save" him. That implies the meaning that literature does not belong to one person or any person rather a good writing is the ultimate product of language and tradition. Individual authors do not matter, but what does matter is tradition, is at the core of many of Borges's writings. (“Encyclopedia,”

Open Document