Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues in business environment
Business and ethical issues
Business ethical issues in an organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical issues in business environment
George faces a complex moral/ethical decision that could change his future. In the article Does This Milkshake Taste Funny? George is said to have “felt a knot forming in his stomach”. In my perspective he shows signs of a person that would reason with deontology theory. Then I will finish with what would George choose if he followed the theories of a utilitarian. Naturally, people do not want to get in trouble. We are all born with a conscience of what is right or wrong without being told. Just like a child does not have to be taught how to lie they just know how to quickly cover a bad decision. Anything to avoid any amount of harm to ourselves. As we become adults we are shaped by our parents teachings, decisions we make, and the praise or punishments we …show more content…
Unhappy clients might lead to loss of customers. The company may see George as a liability and decide to fire him because of the money loss. Another thought is the company may have to report this incident bringing in the health department that could shut down the company temporary or permanently for the health hazard. At first glance the milkshake scenario seems so easy to answer but there is so much more to consider. Utilitarian theory considers all these options and weighs the pros of cons deciding on the least harmful. Utilitarian theory weighs the lesser of two evils. They understand that there is no definite right or wrong answer for some situations. A company cannot just think of the individual but has to think of the business as a society. George being an employee could have thought about the maggot infestation in the same terms as Paul did. If George turned a blind eye he could save the company a lot of mix, which saves money. It would ensure that the production orders would be finished on time. Restaurants would still get their milkshake containers. The whole crew would get to go home once they were done. Most likely, no one ever know any better. These are cons that
Such cases may force people to keep quiet instead, due to fear. Shame / embarrassment = = = =
When Mr. Potter asked him to join his side so he could get more money, George thought better of himself and decided the best thing to do was to turn down the deal even though it was a once in a lifetime deal. George didn’t want to do it, but he at sometime had to face up to the problem of not getting to see the world like he wanted to when he was younger.
... court, there are only two choices for their fate: confess to a false crime and spend time in jail for it, or don't confess and face either torture until you confess or your execution. It is a lose lose situation. This is true for every person who is tried in front of the court. People became fearful of this and they could do nothing but accuse everyone they can in order to prevent accusation of themselves.
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that states that an action is considered right as long as it promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. This theory was first proposed by Jeremy Bentham and later was refined by J.S Mill. Mill differs from Bentham by introducing a qualitative view on pleasure and makes a distinction between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. John Hospers critiques utilitarianism and shows that rule utilitarianism under more specific and stricter rules would promote utility better. Bernard Williams believes that utilitarianism is too demanding from people and instead believes virtue ethics is a better solution. Williams seems to have only considered act utilitarianism instead of rule utilitarianism, which may have better responses to the problems proposed by Williams. Sterling Hardwood purposes eleven objections to utilitarianism which can be used to help make compromise between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. I will argue that rule utilitarianism can be formed in such a way that it avoids the problems that arise from Williams, and Hardwood.
When one does wrong, the common reaction is to hide it and pretend as if nothing happened. Because of the human conscience it is difficult to completely forget about a wrongdoing. Through our conscience guilt is built up and eventually that guilt shatters enough barriers and in turn causes the doer to admit his/her wrong.
They fear they will be punished or made fun of for speaking the truth so they tend to keep it to themselves. I wish people were to speak the truth at all times so be straightforward with people. A society full of lies is not good because it can mislead people into thinking that something is ok when in reality it is not. John the Savage had said in chapter sixteen, “It all seems to me quite horrible” (pg. 244).This is when he is asked about the world state and he does not like how it's run because people are not who they want to be but rather who they are conditioned to be.
Be honest: How many choices did George really have? For stating the situation: A person called Lennie is committing an unwanted crime on a loved person that has the affect of making the husband raging. Lennie hides, and the husband comes after him with a rifle with the will to kill him for this act. George finds it out and is automatically involved with this situation although he hasn't done a thing. And now he has to make a decision for someone who is not able to understand that he can't make any.
The problem with Utilitarianism is not that it seeks to maximize happiness. Rather, it is that Utilitarianism is so fixated on generating the most happiness that the need to take into account the morality of the individual actions that constitute the result is essentially eradicated. In so doing, the possibility of committing unethical actions in the name of promoting the general welfare is brought about, which in turn, renders Utilitarianism an inadequate ethical
In this assignment we are to determine the moral difference between Deontological moral theory and Utilitarianism with regard to the changing of lives on a chance twist of fate with the brakes blowing out of the Trolley excursion. To turn or not to turn that is the question. Weather it is nobler of the heart and mind to follow the path of one and not the other remains a personal choice.
One reason is to please authority. People in general like the feeling they get when they are doing a good job. Even though they know what they are doing is morally wrong, the way they tried to justify themselves is by verbally disagreeing. By doing this they feel that they are "on the side of the angels". A lot of people do not have the ability to disobey authority.
In discussing the guilt of George you have to consider the time setting of this novel. It was set in the 1930’s. The reason you must consider the time setting is because things change with time. What may have been allowed then may not have been allowed now. What happened then may not have
In Williams's first example he discusses the situation of a man. George is having a difficult time finding a job after completing his Ph.D. in chemistry. He is offered a job to work on chemical and biological warfare. Although the job would be beneficial for him professionally, he is strongly against this type of research. In addition, George's low level of commitment to the project would slow the progress of the research, providing for less advancement in chemical and biological warfare. The utilitarian reply to this would be that George should accept his j...
In utilitarianism the common goal is to create the most happiness for the most amount of people. Mills definition of the Greatest Happiness Principle “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (540) If this principle is the case then as a utilitarian your actions of good should promote the most happiness. This way of thinking can really produce some wrong answers and actions to moral questions. For example, say you and your family are starving and in need of food. The only possible way to get food would be to steal it. In general society finds it morally wrong to steal under any circumstances. But as utilitarian you have to ask, would my actions of stealing food promote the most happiness for the most people. You need to take into account the people you are making happy and the people you are hurting. On one hand, you would be promoting happiness for you and your and entire family, and on the other hand, you would be hurting the storeowner by stealing some of his revenue. Utilitarian ideas tell you that you should steal the food because your actions are promoting happiness and the absence of pain for the least amount of people. There are other examples I found when doing some research like doctors going against morals to save more sick people by letting one healthy person die
When making tough decisions about those who are close, it is hard to know what the right call is. This is something that George from John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men knows far too well. When George’s mentally impaired companion, Lennie, accidentally kills his bosses’ wife, George is faced with the question of what to do. Ultimately he decides that the best thing for himself and for Lennie is to shoot him. Although it could be argued that murder isn’t right for any reason, in this instance, George made the right decision to kill Lennie although it wasn’t an easy one.
Two ideologies that exist in ethics and apply to decision-making are utilitarian and deontological viewpoints. Ethical theories provide a systematic approach to decision-making toward the applications of standard principles. “In utilitarian ethics, outcomes justify the means or ways to achieve it” (Mandal, Ponnambath, & Parija, 2016, p. 5). Decisions made considering utility are based benefitting the greatest number of people. In utilitarianism, outcomes determine the moral nature of interventions. Some people are to experience harm, but the overall outcome is good for most individuals. Applying utilitarianism personally or professionally seems relevant when considering its ideology maximizes happiness and minimizes suffering. Utilitarianism