Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
All quiet on the western front critiques
Social impact of 1st world war
All quiet on the western front analytical essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: All quiet on the western front critiques
Noah Shamsai
Ms. Humes
AS English II
13 November 2014
The Lost Generation
“Only the dead have seen the end of the war,” says Plato, and those who survive continue to be touched by the experience of the front. In Erich Maria Remarque’s “All Quiet on the Western Front”, Paul Bäumer, representative of World War I’s youth soldiers, describes his escapade in war, filled with life, death, and horror. The young, unmarried soldier will be lost even if he survives the war because of a loss of ambition, a loss of innocence, and a loss of relatability.
The first reason the men in the war will be destroyed by it is because they all become cannon fodder, expendable entities that no longer have any aspirations, and therefore are unable to assimilate into
…show more content…
society after the war. When Paul and his classmates receive the letter from Kantorek regarding the “Iron Youth,” Paul reflects upon their current status: “Kantorek would say that [they] stood on the threshold of life.
And so it would seem. [They] had as yet taken no root. The war swept [them] away … [The men] knew only that in some strange and melancholy way [they] had become a waste land” (20). Early in the novel, Paul has already decided that he and his troop of young men have been destroyed by the war, as a plant that has been pulled up before its roots have taken hold in the soil, the youth have little previous life, and of that nothing remains. Before the warfare, the men had just begun to construct their life goals, but the combat cleared away these hopes, and hence, upon returning home, the young men will be misplaced in the world. Another statement that further expresses Paul’s lack of objectives is given when his comrades are inquiring about what Paul plans to do if he were to return from the war: “When [Paul hears] the word ‘peace-time,’ it goes to [his] head: and if it really came, [he thinks he] would do some unimaginable thing …show more content…
… But [Paul cannot] even imagine anything. All [he knows] is that this business about professions and studies and salaries ands so on − it makes [him] sick, it is and always was disgusting, [he does not] see anything at all” (87). Paul’s response illustrates that despite seeking to do something upon his return, he has lost his desire for work, demonstrating that the men cannot return to anything. If the men have no drive to find work when they return, they will be rendered as unfit for society, where a man is defined by what his occupation is. These young men have been stripped of their goals and spirit through the war, causing them to be lost even if they survive. Second of all, Paul and his classmates enlist in the German army when they are at the ripe age of nineteen, the period in which boys become men and are close to the peak of their lives, but Paul and the other men’s experience in the military causes them to lose the innocence they had before the war. When Müller is questioning his comrades about what they when the fighting ends, they come to a stark conclusion: “[They] are not youth any longer. [They] don’t want to take the world by storm … [They] were eighteen and had begun to love life and the world; and [they] had it shot to pieces. The first bomb, the first explosion, burst in [their] hearts. [They] are cut off from activity, from striving, from progress” (87-88). The innocence that Paul had before the war was the ability to “love life and the world,” and during the course of the many bombardments, fatalities, and injuries, this motivation was lost, as if he had skipped this stage of his life. He is no longer a young, inexperienced boy, but instead he is a weathered man with different values than those who are not enlisted in the army. An additional event that reveals Paul’s lost innocence is the permanent link between intercourse and the army brothels, which Paul realizes during his encounter with the little brunette: “How different is this from the conditions in the soldiers’ brothels … [Paul wishes he] never thought of them; but desire turns [his] mind to them involuntarily and [he is] afraid for it might be impossible ever to be free of them again” (150). The only place Paul has experienced sexual intercourse until now has been at the brothels, and even when he is removed from this setting, there is an ingrained relation between the two, representing the war’s effect on Paul’s love life. Brothels often carry a negative connotation, and because a key part of Paul’s adolescent years are subjected to them, his innocence and social judgment will be forever changed. If Paul returned home after the war, his level of comforts and norms, both measures of innocence, would be much different than what is expected of a man his age, therefore he would be ostracized by his peers who have not been to war. The final, key reason why the young men of World War I will be lost if they return home is due to the fact that they cannot relate to their previous selves, families, and friends; The men that joined the army are not the same as the men that escaped it. Upon Paul’s leave, he encounters a shocking revelation when he attempts to read the books he once was so interested in: “[Paul] takes one of the books, intending to read, and turn over the leaves … [He stands] there dumb. As before a judge. Dejected. Words, words, words − they do not reach [him]. Slowly [he places] the books back in the shelves. Nevermore” (173). Most adolescents of this time would find pleasure in reading a novel or a textbook, and Paul can no longer connect with his old hobby, unlike the other young people, because the war has scrubbed his mind of what knowledge and pleasure are. Paul does not believe that words on a page are useful, but instead that skills needed for survival in warfare are, something not shared between Paul and his hometown colleagues, making adjustment back to civilization difficult. Paul’s disconnect goes beyond reading; after he spends time with a previous teacher of his during his leave, he concludes that “[Everyone at home talks] too much for [Paul]. They have aims, desires, that [he] cannot comprehend. [He] often [sits] with one of them in the little beer garden and [tries] to explain to him that this is really the only thing: just to sit quietly” (168). The war has reduced Paul to a point where he “cannot comprehend” the ambitions that the others have, so if he returns from the front, Paul will not be able to connect on the same topics. Although Paul once had similar dreams, the necessity to survive in the battle has taught him that ignorance toward his future is bliss. Interaction with others is a fundamental for everyday life, and a soldier wouldn’t be able to do so, leaving him astray in the world. Representing a lost generation, Paul Bäumer demonstrates how the youthful men that went to war, being ill informed of the consequences, were destroyed by a devastation of the will to live that is required to enjoy life, a premature loss of innocence that changes many important experiences faced by budding youths, and the split between soldiers and common people that makes finding a relatable subject matter very difficult.
While the older, settled men simply see the war as bump in the road of life, the young men are so traumatized and altered by it, as if in their road of life, they crossed the bridge of war, which fell behind them, leaving a gap between who they were and who they are now. In Paul’s final passage, he blatantly states, “Men will not understand [the young, unmarried group of soldiers] − for the generation that grew up before [them] … will now return to its old occupation, and the war will be forgotten − and the generation that has grown up after [them] will be strange to [them] and push [them] aside … the years will pass by and in the end [they] shall fall into ruin”
(294).
So said German World War I Veteran, Erich Maria Remarque, in his book All Quiet on The Western Front. War is an extremely complex and corrupt affair that many can’t even begin to comprehend. This juxtaposing quote perfectly depicts how Remarque’s detailed and personal novel allows the reader inside the mind of a soldier, giving unique insight on war. The novel follows the events narrator Paul Bäumer encounters whilst at war and shows Bäumer’s reflective thoughts on these events. This form of narration is a large part of what makes the book so effective. The book conveys many strong messages about war but the most prominent ones in the story line are:
“I am young, I am twenty years old; yet I know nothing of life but despair, death, fear, and fatuous superficiality cast over an abyss of sorrow. I see how peoples are set against one another, and in silence, unknowingly, foolishly, obediently, innocently slay one another (263).” Powerful changes result from horrifying experiences. Paul Baumer, the protagonists of Erich Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front utters these words signifying the loss of his humanity and the reduction to a numbed creature, devoid of emotion. Paul’s character originates in the novel as a young adult, out for an adventure, and eager to serve his country. He never realizes the terrible pressures that war imposes on soldiers, and at the conclusion of the book the empty shell resembling Paul stands testament to this. Not only does Paul lose himself throughout the course of the war, but he loses each of his 20 classmates who volunteered with him, further emphasizing the terrible consequences of warfare. The heavy psychological demands of life in the trenches and the harsh reality of war strip Paul of his humanity and leave him with a body devoid of all sentiment and feeling.
Erich Maria Remarque’s novel, All Quiet on the Western Front gives you detail and insight into the long, destructive “Great War”. Quickly, romantic illusions about combat are disintegrate. Enthusiastic teenage boys convinced to fight for their country by their patriotic teachers came back feeling part of a lost generation . This novel teaches us what a terrifying and painful experience World War I was for those fighting in the trenches on the front.
Society wants soldiers to believe that war is glorious. But it is not. Society wants soldiers to believe war is an adventure. But it is not. Society wants soldiers to believe that our enemy is the only enemy, that our cause is the only cause, that our people are the only people. But there are many enemies, many causes and many peoples. According to Paul, all these causes are equally ignoble, and none of these enemies are worthy of being slaughtered en masse. For Paul, as for many people, past, present, and future, war is simply unacceptable, and nothing can repair the damage it does.
Everyone knows what war is. It's a nation taking all of its men, resources, weapons and most of its money and bearing all malignantly towards another nation. War is about death, destruction, disease, loss, pain, suffering and hate. I often think to myself why grown and intelligent individuals cannot resolve matters any better than to take up arms and crawl around, wrestle and fight like animals. In All Quiet on the Western Front, Erich Maria Remarque puts all of these aspects of war into a vivid story which tells the horrors of World War 1 through a soldier's eyes. The idea that he conveys most throughout this book is the idea of destruction, the destruction of bodies, minds and innocence.
Soldiers, using their instinct alone, must set aside their humanity to survive during their time on the battlefield. When Paul and his friends reach the battlefront, they find that they “become on the instant human animals” (56). Because of their desire to survive, they must surrender their morals and beliefs to their primal instinct. In this instance, they become savage beasts, making it easier to kill on the field. Their former selves effectively die in the war, becoming “insensible, dead men, who through some trick, some dreadful magic, are still able to run and to kill” (116). The war takes a toll on
Erich Maria Remarque’s classic novel All Quiet on the Western Front is based on World War I; it portrays themes involving suffering, comradeship, chance and dehumanization. The novel is narrated by Paul, a young soldier in the German military, who fights on the western front during The Great War. Like many German soldiers, Paul and his fellow friends join the war after listening to the patriotic language of the older generation and particularly Kantorek, a high school history teacher. After being exposed to unbelievable scenes on the front, Paul and his fellow friends realize that war is not as glorifying and heroic as the older generation has made it sound. Paul and his co-soldiers continuously see horrors of war leading them to become hardened, robot-like objects with one goal: the will to survive.
to deteriorate the human spirit. Starting out leaving you're home and family and ready to fight for you country, to ending up tired and scarred both physically and mentally beyond description. At the beginning of the novel nationalist feelings are present through pride of Paul and the rest of the boys. However at the end of the war it is apparent how pointless war really is.
Erich Maria Remarque's classic war novel, All Quiet on the Western Front, deals with the many ways in which World War I affected people's lives, both the lives of soldiers on the front lines and the lives of people on the homefront. One of the most profound effects the war had was the way it made the soldiers see human life. Constant killing and death became a part of a soldier's daily life, and soldiers fighting on all sides of the war became accustomed to it. The atrocities and frequent deaths that the soldiers dealt with desensitized them to the reality of the vast quantities of people dying daily. The title character of the novel, Paul Bäumer, and his friends experience the devaluation of human life firsthand, and from these experiences they become stronger and learn to live as if every day were their last.
People who have actually been through war know how horrible it is. Society on the other hand, while it believes it knows the horrors of war, can never understand or sympathize with a soldier’s situation. The only people who can understand war is those who have been through it so they can often feel alone if they are out of the military. Paul cannot even give a straight answer to his own father about his dad’s inquiries about war. Paul’s dad does not understand that people who have been in the war can in no way truly express the horrible things that that have seen and experienced. Nor can Paul fit in with the society who does not understand him. Paul and so many others were brought into the war so young that they know of nothing else other than war. Paul held these views on society as he said, “We will be superfluous even to ourselves, we will grow older, a few will adapt themselves, some others will merely submit, and most will be bewildered;-the years will pass by and in the end we shall fall in to ruin.
Many of Remarque’s ideas expressed in All Quiet on the Western Front were not completely new. Remarque emphasized things that portrayed the magnitude of issues soldiers face, and how the physical body and senses affects their emotional well-being. The ideas in All Quiet in the Western Front of not knowing the difference between sleep and death, seeing gruesome sights of people, and frustration towards people who cannot sympathize with soldiers, are also shown in Siegfried Sassoon’s “The Dug-Out”, Giuseppe Ungaretti’s “Vigil”, and Sassoon's’ “Suicide in the Trenches”.
Paul and his generation feel separated from the rest society. Paul feels as though “[he has] been crushed without knowing it” and “[does] not belong anymore, it is a foreign world” (168). Other men “talk to much for [him]. They have worries, aims, desires, that [he] cannot comprehend” (168). His generation of men who fought in the war is “pushed aside” (249) as unpleasant reminders of a war the civilian population would like to forget. After surviving such unspeakable experiences the soldiers feel separated from everyone. Paul says, “men will not understand us” (294). “The generation that has grown up after us will be strange to us and push us aside” (294). After the war most soldiers “will be bewildered” (294) and “in the end [they] will fall into ruin” (294). The soldiers do not have concrete identities as the older generations do. “All the older men are linked up with their previous life” (19). Paul’s generation cannot even imagine any definite post-war plans. Their experiences are so shattering that they regard the prospect of functioning in a peacetime environment with vague anxiety. They have no experiences as adults that do not involve a day-to-day fight for survival and sanity. Paul has a “feeling if foreignness” and “cannot find [his] way back” (172).
What is war really like all together? What makes war so horrifying? The horror of war is throughout All Quiet on the Western Front. For example Albert says the war has ruined them as young people and Paul agrees. “Albert expresses it: "The war has ruined us for everything." He is right. We are not youth any longer. We don't want to take the world by storm. We are fleeing. We fly from ourselves. From our life. We were eighteen and had begun to love life and the world; and we had to shoot it to pieces. The first bomb, the first explosion, burst in our hearts. We are cut off from activity, from striving, from progress. We believe in such things no longer, we believe in the war.” (Remarque, Chapter 5). The way the war has affected each soldier has changed them forever. The boys who were once school boys will never be the same.
He realizes that he has to lose feeling to survive, “That I have looked far as the only possibility of existence after this annihilation of a human emotion” (194). Paul loses all feeling which may be one of the main factors keeping him alive in battle, so that he does not allow himself to process the violence and horror to which he is exposed. Even in the short time where he thinks about all that he has lost he is immediately overwhelmed with feelings and there is no time for this on the battlefront. Paul has no empathy to the enemy and kills without even thinking, “We have lost all feeling for one another. We can hardly control ourselves when our glance lights on the form at some other man” (117). The tragedies during combat desensitize the men of normal human emotions such as remorse, empathy, guilt, and fear; the un-naturalness of killing another human dulls all of these feelings. People were not made to destroy each other, and as a natural defense to this they shut down all of their feelings. Paul 's normal thought of insecurity are gone as he says, “Since then, we have learned better than to be shy about such trifling immodesties. In time things far worse than that come easy to us” (8). The emotions of the average young man are lost at war as their entire lives are put into perspective. Paul 's young adulthood is lost and he does not feel shame in frivolous things any longer. His emotions are not the only thing he loses as he also disconnects from his past, present and
Paul believed the older generation "...ought to be mediators and guides to the world... to the future. / The idea of authority, which they represented, was associated in [their] minds with greater insight and a more humane wisdom." Paul, his classmates, and a majority of their vulnerable generation completely trusted their role models and because of that trust were influenced and pressured into joining the war. They believed the older generation understood the truth behind war and would never send them to a dangerous or inhumane situation, "...but the first death [they] saw shattered this belief." The death caused the soldiers to realize that the experiences of their generation were more in line with reality than those of the older generation and that created a gap between the two. "While [the older generation] continued to write and talk, [Paul's generation] saw the wounded and dying. / While [the older generation] taught that duty to one's country is the greatest thing, [Paul's] already knew that death-throes are stronger."