Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How technology effect the human mind
The effects of the internet and television
How television influences the viewer
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How technology effect the human mind
As the book Amusing Ourselves To Death, discusses some of McLuhan’s ideology on technology by extending our thoughts would impact us through the Internet today is an “extension of the body,” as the internet has changed the way we think and the way we learn has extended our way of thinking. Though the media, television, and social media is where we get our information today with the technology of Internet and social media platforms being introduced to society. I believe that the Internet can make the process better from television because it is print media and you have to use deeper thought that just viewing material. With television however, what gets the most attention is entertaining and uses minimal thought. Our Internet is set up with the content of choice there are only so …show more content…
many choices the Internet though allows for self-selection. At any time though you can remove yourself from it if you get bored. We now can do everything through the Internet and do not have to physically be present giving us capabilities we have never had before as the whole world is connected through the Internet in a so called “global village”. It extends our thoughts and gives us information out into the “cloud” or social media platforms that we do not actually have to be real person, reality therefore; is also changed.
As Postman states, “Each medium like language itself, make possible a unique mode of discourse by providing a new orientation for thought, for expression for sensibility. Which, of course, is what McLuhan meant in saying the “medium is the message.” Postman has many similarities to McLuhan except that instead of a medium the media is a metaphor. He describes how the technology has changed our extensions of thought and intellect. As Postman states, “We used to have to have extensions of thought and intellect when we the printed word allowed us to have reflection pauses and extended or freeze our thoughts and we used to be thinking individuals with printed word by reading books and the newspaper for our answers” (). In today’s technology there is a possibility to use it as an extension tool the Internet gives us entertainment however, it also connects us socially with people from all over the world at a click of a button, which has given society new platforms to socially connect with others instead of just in
person. We might be able to find out information quicker and has taken us back to a print media based system with social media. However, there are negatives to social media platforms as postman states, “ In a sea of information, there was very little of it to use. A man in Maine and a man in Texas could converse, but not about anything either of them knew or cared very much about. The telegraph may have made the country into “one neighborhood,” but it was a peculiar one, populated by strangers who knew nothing but the most superficial facts about each other” (Postman, pg. 67). We have moved even further to where people don’t even tune into the news anymore because of the Internet. We have the applications on our cell phones and people can just quickly skim over the highlights and news programs are becoming irrelevant. Even though our network has extended we now rather communicate through a machine or enjoy experiences alone making our personal relationship amputated and artificial. As Postman states, “Because the television commercial is the single most voluminous form of public communication in our society, it was inevitable that Americans would accommodate themselves to the philosophy of television commercials. By “accommodate,” I mean that we accept them a normal and plausible form of discourse” (Postman). Technology comes with many amputations. Surrounded by advertisements that make us skimmers of news and lazy also re- wires our brains to think like machines. According to Postman, “Indeed, we may go this far: The television commercial is not at all about the character of products to be consumed. It is about the character of the consumers of products. The nature of the media is to suppress the content our ability to reason is eroded because of sound bytes and we don’t even know what we are getting from it. Images of movie stars and famous athletes, of serene lakes an macho fishing trips, of elegant dinners and romantic interludes, of happy families packing their station wagons for picnic in the country these tell nothing about the products being sold. But they tell everything about the fears, fancies and dreams of those who might buy them.” (Postman, pg. 128,). We are so entertained we no longer pay attention to what is important to us and live in a false reality. Therefore, changing our social skills and how we interact with each other. For example, now we scroll through Netflix for hours to find something that will best amuse us at the moment. There is so much information out there you are going to listen to the information that is most entertaining to you. Americans have stopped paying attention to the important information, so now we do not have the ability to tell the truth we have lost the ability to reason or have intellectual conversations. Americans should ask themselves do you pay attention to your local politics or policies? The answer is no. Instead, our citizens are paying more attention to global terrorist attacks happening in distant locations. A world of fragments is what we are living in with the inability to understand the information or do anything about it. In our current elections, the media is trying to make the candidates appearances enhanced by trying to make them look more attractive for debates and such. When attractiveness is mentioned in Amusing Ourselves to Death, it is clear that looks matter in television and you will be taken more seriously or have more “creditability” if you are attractive. Our election spectacle has become a way to amusement. We have made our candidates into a joke, and it has removed an assumed humanity. Political campaigns are ran by thirty second campaign commercials the candidates no longer have to face “position papers” or write books on the issues because they would loose compared to the candidate who ran an attention grabbing commercial. We also have branding strategies how we tag people like “lying Ted” or “crooked Hillary” that are given and eventually become truth even though we have no proof because society does not know the difference between what is false and what is truth. Even worse that the mass media impacts our way of seeing politicians and how we understand our politics and loss of confidence in politics, therefore, we lose faith in the system. As Postman states, “Television has achieved the status of “meta-medium” an instrument that directs not only our knowledge of the world, but our knowledge of ways of knowing as well. We live in more of a “Huxley” situation than ever before, “television clearly does impair the student’s freedom to read, and it does so with innocent hands, so to speak. Television does not ban books it simply displaces them. The fight against censorship is a nineteenth century issue, which was largely won in the twentieth. What we are confronted with now is the problem posed by the economic and symbolic structure of television. Those who run television do not limit our access to information but in fact widen it” (Postman, Chapter 10 page 141,). Which is one of the reasons we are in the current political election situation. We are just now realizing the corruption because we were distracted by entertainment and instant gratification. Quite possibly even though Americans are mad at this system we will eventually “disconnect” with our government and go back to the entertainment distraction allowing our government to remain corrupt. Postman envisioned with the Internet we just keep to ourselves more now than when we just relied on newspapers. Therefore, it has a social impact on us because we don’t have empathy and we aren’t talking to each other about the issues we face. We loose our interactions with other people and real relationships. Our habits have also changed, As Postman stated “The result of all this is that Americans are the best entertained and quite likely the least well informed people in the Western World” (Postman, #106,). Entertainment is the main cause of public discourse not all television is for entertainment. Audiences prefer to see quick moving edited images. American Internet and television has developed long lines of not only the bias of the media but also the interests of the viewers. According to the video, “we have a new technology in its American expression that tends to degrade literate rational discourse and it changes it” (Video). As Postman states, “one can hardly overestimate the damage that such juxtapositions do to our sense of the world as a serious place. The damage is especially massive to youthful viewers who depend so much on television for their clues as to how to respond to the world. In watching television news, they, more than any other segment of the audience, are drawn into an epistemology based on the assumption that all reports of cruelty and death are greatly exaggerated and, in any case, not to be taken seriously or responded to sanely” (Postman, Chapter 6 Page #105 ,). The amputation with the Internet is creditability, for example in a poll the anchorman was more highly trusted than the President of the United States. It doesn’t matter if they are telling the truth just if they are believable. As Postman states, “As the game of that name uses facts as a source of amusement, so do our sources of news. It has been demonstrated many times that a culture can survive misinformation and false opinion. It has not yet been demonstrated whether a culture can survive if it takes the measure of the world in twenty-two minutes. Or if the value of its news is determined by the number of laughs it provides” (Postman, #113 ,). There is an issue if we wonder what we mean by truth as Postman states a “dancing girl” medium has become the central medium of the culture and other forms pushed aside awareness may be the solution most people now don’t see any issue with television and so we must have awareness to the public of it’s effects. As Postman stated in Amusing Ourselves To Death, “Television, in other words, is transforming our culture into one vast arena for show business. It is entirely possible, of course, that in the end we shall find that delightful, and decide we like it just fine. That is exactly what Aldous Huxley feared was coming, fifty years ago” (Postman, pg. 80,). The history of technology it has a way of taking control of culture and the habits of the culture and continues to do so with technology today as is destroys our past culture. Technology in education through does make a difference. “Television does not extend or amplify literate culture. It attacks it. If television is a continuation of anything, it is of a tradition begun by the telegraph and photograph in the mid nineteenth century, not by the printing press in the fifteenth” (Postman, Chapter 6 Pg. # 84, ). Computer technology has been accepted in schools without asking the effects or consequences it might have on the culture. A huge jump has happened that the technology has the best use of us. The forces of technology are very powerful and are underestimated by people who say that the Internet and television is neutral it is what we do with it that matters. There are many extensions to the Internet from television as our technology expands and opening up communication lengths many never though possible. However, with that there are less personal interactions that affect our brains and our societal health that are serious amputations and repercussions attached to the Internet. However even though there aren’t many educational purposes to television if used and educated on correctly the Internet could be used as a tool to make us the most informed society ever.
While his best arguments come from cultural criticism. Written text led to the decline of oral reading and television obliterated the radio. Every technology comes with it’s trade-offs, it just comes down to moderation. There is little doubt that the internet is changing our brain. What Carr neglects to mention, however, is how the internet can change our brain for the better. Computer games have the ability to improve cognitive tasks and increase visual attention. He doesn’t always address the good effects that the internet has had on the world. One of the better strategies Carr uses is switching his point of view from third to first person. He reflects on his personal life and how his life has changed in response to what he has learned. Carr shows how even he has his faults but, being aware of a problem is the first step to finding
... access to it from various forms of media. Instead of demolishing our ability to read and learn, the internet aids us by giving us rapid information that would otherwise take days of research through books to attain. Therefore, the internet should not be viewed as the cause for our lack of intelligence, but rather the reason for our vast knowledge. Technology has revolutionized our learning and will continue to serve as the prime tool in our education.
Postman bases his argument on the belief that public discourse in America, when governed by the epistemology of the printing press, was "generally coherent, serious, and rational" (16) because the reader was required to ingest, understand, and think about the logic of the author's arguments before coming to a verdict. In effect, intelligence in a print-based world "implies that one can dwell comfortably without pictures, in a field of concepts and generalizations" (26). However, with the emergence of television and its rapid ascendancy in our culture, Postman argues that discourse has become "shriveled and absurd" (16). TV, he says, assaults us with fleeting images and disconnected bits of information with no context except for the "pseudo-context" which is manufactured "to give fragmented and irrelevant information a seeming use" (76). In effect, TV demands a certain kind of content-the "medium is the message" in the words of Marshall McLuhan-that Postman believes is suitable to the world of show business and hostile to the print-based world of logical thinking (80). This is not to say that TV ignores important subjects such as current affairs, politics, religion, science, and e...
Electronic media is inferior to print media due to the fact that electronic media can be bias, selective, and evasive for the purpose of entertainment. Electronic media serves as a form of entertainment with a main goal of serving their ratings rather than serving the people. It would seem that Postman would agree with this theory since he describes electronic media as a form of entertainment rather than a reliable source of information and facts in his book Amusing Ourselves to Death.
Postman wrote 18 books and more than 200 magazine and newspaper articles. Postman's best known book is Amusing Ourselves to Death, published in 1985. It explores the decline of the communication medium as television images have replaced the written word. Postman argues that television confounds serious issues with entertainment, demeaning and undermining political discourse by making it less about ideas and more about image. He also argues that television is not an effective way of providing education, as it provides only passive information transfer, rather than the interaction that he believes is necessary to maximize learning. He draws on the ideas of media theorist Marshall McLuhan to argue that different media are appropriate for different kinds of knowledge, and describes how oral, literate, and televisual cultures value and transfer information in different ways.
In the first chapter of Amusing Ourselves To Death , Neil Postman's major premise is how the rise of television media and the decline of print media is shaping the quality of information we receive.Postman describes how the medium controls the message, he uses examples which include the use of clocks, smoke signals, the alphabet, and glasses.Postman says a society that generally uses smoke signals is not likely to talk about philosophy because it would take to long and be too difficult. Postman also describes the way television changes peoples way of thinking; a fat person will not look good on TV and would less likely be elected President. On the other hand someones body is not important as their ideas when they are expressing them through the radio or print. On TV, visual imagery reigns. Therefore the form of TV works against the content of philosophy. Postman shows how the clock has changed. Postman describes how time was a product of nature measured by the sun and seasons. Now, time is measured by a machine using minutes and seconds. The clock changed us into time-watchers, then time-savers, and finally time-servers. Thus, changing the metaphor for time changed how we view time itself.
Like Gladwell, Nicholas Carr believes the internet has negative effects. In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Carr attempts to show as the internet becomes our primary source of information, it diminishes the ability to read books and extensive research. Carr goes on to give a very well researched account of how text on the internet is designed make browsing fast and profitable. He describes how the design for skimming affects our thinking skills and attention spans. He wraps up his argument by describing what we are losing in the shift toward using the internet as our main information source. Carr suggests the learning process that occurs in extensive research and through reading is lost. While the learning process can be beneficial to scholars and intellectuals, not everyone has the capability to follow through with it. The internet offers an education that anyone can have access to and understand. Also if Carr believes the learning process is better, this option is always available for people who want to learn according to this scholarly principal. However, for the rest of the population the quick and easy access has allowed the average population to become more educated, and to expose themselves to aspects of academia that previously is reserved for
I’m scrolling through the articles on Snapchat and find my way across one with an intriguing title, I instantly tap on it. I begin to scroll further down only to find myself going through extensive paragraphs of information and suddenly this article that seemed so interesting became a bore. In Nicholas G. Carr’s novel, The Shallows, he argues the internet is creating more problems to us humans than actual benefits. Our social skills are starting to lack and our interaction with technology is beginning to heighten. Humans contemplative skills are slowly fading away due to our reliance on the internet to solve our problems. Technology is inevitable by humans, seeing that individuals use it in their everyday lives. Unfortunately, this is a problem considering the use of high-tech gadgets decrease in one’s capacity for concentration, contemplation, and personal memory.
Moreover, Carr’s article mentions that by using technology of any kind, users tend to embody the characteristics stimulated by that technology. He says that given that the Internet processes information almost immediately, users will tend to value immediacy. To explain, Carr gives the example of a friend of his named Scott Karp who was a literary major on college and who used to be an avid book reader. However, since the arrival of the Internet, Karp skim articles online because he could no longer read as much as he used too. He cannot pay attention and absorb long texts ever since he read online articles. Internet...
In Is Google Making Us Stupid, Nicholas Carr disputes that due to new digital tools, peoples’ ability to retain and acquire information has been negatively altered. Even though, we have information at our fingertips, we often don’t take the time to soak in all the information. Carr mentions Bruce Friedman, a blogger, who finds it extremely difficult to read a “longish article on the web” and to try to focus on the importance of the text holistically (Carr 316). This is an issue that many can relate even Carr knows that, “ the deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle (Carr 314). Additionally, media theorist Mcluhan describes the net as “chipping away [mental] capacity for concentration and contemplation” (Carr 315). In essences, Carr states that we are having less of an attention span and consequently, less patience for longer articles (Carr 314). Therefore, this affects media outlets such as magazines, newspapers, and other articles, because they must conform and shorten their texts to fit the status quo that people safely enjoy (Carr 321). In addition, the net forces people to be efficient, and so, causes people to “weaken [their] capacity for deep reading” (Carr 317). People are becoming more driven on how quick he or she has to do something rather than think why this text is important. As a consequence, Carr believes that we are starting to lose our ability to be critical readers and
Carr explains how the internet can distract us making it harder to focus on tasks. He explains how processing information has become harder. Notifications, ads, popups can make it difficult if you are trying to read an article or book (Carr 57). The internet has become the center of our attention (Carr 57). Carr is explaining how this is the reason why we are struggling to comprehend a certain piece of information. He adds in his article that scientists, researchers and educators have also noticed the difference in concentration. And in further detail, he explains that we fail to see the important information, thus affecting cognition. He says that the information we gather is not valuable unless we know the meaning behind it. Carr concludes with explaining that the more the internet evolves the less valuable information is to
These two articles are similar in the sense that they agree that the internet and computational objects are reshaping our brain’s structure by changing our neural circuit. By using examples from their personal experiences to identify a trend in technology use, the authors illustrate that the more we bury ourselves in technology the more we are unable to understand material which leads to loss of concentration and the ability to think for ourselves. As an author, Carr finds the internet a beneficial tool, but it’s having a bad effect on his concentration span. Carr points this out by stating “Immersing myself in a book or lengthy article used to be easy, now I get fidgety, lose the thread and begin looking for something else to do” (39). He is no
Carr discusses the effects that the Internet has on our minds and the way we think, as well as the way media has changed. Our minds no longer focus. When in conversation with people we are constantly distracted by the technological advances our era has brought. Text messages, emails, pop culture drama has all taken over thoughts.
Marshall McLuhan and Raymond Williams, both cornerstones in their respected media theory and cultural studies, differed in their opinions of the relationship between media technology and social change. McLuhan believed in technological determinism, which is “an approach that identifies technology, or technological developments, as the central causal element in processes of change” (Croteau, Hoynes, and Milan 290). In other words, McLuhan believes that new technology drives the way cultural values and social structures develop. He was interested in the cultural effects produced by electronic media; he was especially interested in the effects of televisions. McLuhan’s The Medium is the Massage argued that technology has changed the way humans do things and interact, that “all media are extensions of some human faculty” (McLuhan 5).
“American Media History is the story of a nation. It is the story of events in the long battle to disseminate information, entertainment, and opinion in society. It is the story of the men and women whose inventions, ideas, and struggles helped shape the nation and its media system.”(Fellow) The evolution of media has influenced countless societal and cultural changes leading to the present day. But it didn’t get this far over night. It is estimated to have begun more than 30,000 years ago through the process of cave painting. (Crewe) Following cave painting, came the invention of books being printed on blocks “The Diamond Sutra”, the Gutenberg printing press, newspapers in 1640, photographs, the radio in 1894, television, and recently computers; which lead all the way to modern day social media. Through the hard work of multiple inventors the media was able to reach where it is today. It has changed the way people communicate with each other, mostly for the better.“ The way people experience the meaning, how they perceive the world and communicate with each other, and how they distinguish the past and identify the future.” (Gitelman) Or as we know it as: a new way of communicating information from person to person.