Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on hitler's rise to power and how he consolidated his power
How hitler rose to power
Hitler's rise to power
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
America, Officer Democracy
On December 29, 1940, Franklin D. Roosevelt rallied the American opinion behind the implementation of his lend-lease program by delivering an oration that designated America as “the great arsenal of Democracy”. Signed in 1941, the Lend Lease Act required Americans to “apply ourselves to our task [providing Britain with military and financial aid] with the same resolution, the same sense of urgency, the same spirit of patriotism and sacrifice as we would show were we at war.” Seventy-six years later, America must constantly police the security of democracy and finds itself in situations where it is necessary to take a leadership role in advancing democracy at home and abroad; most notable is the active role it is
…show more content…
necessary to take in Venezuela to prevent both economic turmoil and the takeover of totalitarianism. A desperate populace is the ideal soil for despotism to grow on.
We saw this with Hitler’s ascension to power in World War II, and we are seeing it again in Venezuela. Socialist Nicolas Maduro accepted his role as President in 2013 following an extremely close yet legal vote. Since then, his “socialism” that promised long-awaited economic equality has done nothing but deepen the divide between the rich and the poor and spiral the country into ever-worsening fiscal turmoil. Naturally, critics began to cry out against Maduro’s rule; however, instead of giving them any sort of fair chance (like we would here, in America), Maduro simultaneously silenced them and strengthened his control over the masses by rigging the next presidential vote. Basically, Maduro suspended the voting rights of 4 legislatures, 3 of which were affiliated with his opposition. He did this shamelessly and ruthlessly, and in effect spat in the face of the main democratic principles of “majority rules” and “fair elections”. This desecration of democratic ideals was similarly practiced by Hitler, where he rigged elections by utilizing fear as a weapon. America should personally be worried about Maduro’s actions as it poses as direct of a threat to democracy abroad …show more content…
as Nazism did in World War II. The Venezuelan opposition has “vowed to continue protests”, but so far their protests have gotten them nowhere as Maduro continues to garner more and more control as protests grow more and more violent. If America opens its eyes, it will see that other countries’ leaders may notice the rich, powerful lifestyle that Maduro lives and might copy his despotic tendencies to seize both control and money from his/her unknowing commonality.
Like Russian Communism, we should notice that the Domino Theory may apply here and that if Venezuela falls to totalitarianism, other countries might follow suit. Seeing that non-democratic countries typically harbor an intense disliking towards the United States (probably because we are, in fact, the “great arsenal” of the exact thing they hate) this is directly dangerous to America’s safety and worldly influence. In addition, American aid in Venezuela will increase stability with Venezuela, all of its trading partners, and, effectually, ourselves. As to how exactly America should intervene as the “great arsenal of Democracy” in Venezuela, we should do something akin to what we did in World War II. Similarly to how we enacted the Lend Lease act to provide military support to the struggling British, we should provide financial support to the adversaries of Maduro so that they may use it as leverage to reclaim their freedoms that were taken by their leader. Also, we should officially remain neutral on a militaristic level and only intervene with troops if the situation worsens and the dominos start
falling like we feared they would. When FDR proclaimed America’s influence as a democratic policeman and began issuing aid to Nazi opposition, we correspondingly were able to defeat the terrors of Hitler and Nazism, dig ourselves out of the Great Depression, and establish ourselves as an international superpower. With great power comes great responsibility, and America needs to recognize its duties as the “great arsenal of democracy” and arbitrate peace in Venezuela.
Steven Hook and John Spanier's 2012 book titled “American foreign policy since WWII" serves as one of the most important texts that can be used in understanding the underlying complexities on American foreign policies. Like the first readings that are analyzed in class (American Diplomacy by George Kennan and Surprise, Security, and the American Experience by John Lewis Gaddis), this text also brings history into a more understandable context. Aside from being informative and concise in its historical approach, Hook and Spanier also critiques the several flaws and perspectives that occurred in the American foreign policy history since World War II.
It is somehow strange for today’s reader to find out that the situation with America’s foreign affairs hasn’t changed much. As some clever people have said, “The History book on the shelf is always repeating itself.” Even after nineteen years, Americans think of themselves as citizens of the strongest nation in the world. Even after the September the 11th. Even after Iraq. And Afghanistan.
In 1938, FDR 'set out to align the United States with the Western democracies, embarking on a sustained effort to educate his nation to his views and build up its military capacity' (Greenstein 20). This creation of the United States as a world power helped boost the need for a more modernized presidency. As a result of establishing the presence of the United States, FDR was called upon to aid Britain during Germany's invasion. Because of FDR's charismatic ways, the 'lend-lease bill' was created under the explanation of lending your neighbor your garden house if his home caught on fire. FDR said as long as the neighbor later returns it; everything is the same as it was before (Greenstein 20). By using simple analogies and drawing upon public support, FDR succeeded in basically giving Britain weapons to use free of charge. This action also helped establish an alliance with Britain for the future. Though FDR did not realize it at the time, building up the military to establish the United States as a world power, would later lead to the realization of the United States as a superpower.
Roosevelt paved the United States’ path from isolation to power. When World War II broke out in Europe, the country was largely isolationist. “Isolationist rhetoric reflected real public sentiment, as Roosevelt knew” (Renka, The Modern Presidency…). Roosevelt, however, seemed a step ahead of the nation. He stood firmly against Hitler and strove to align the United States with Western democracies and to strengthen the military (Greenstein 20). In 1938, Roosevelt’s foreign policy speeches began to reveal an obvious swing away from isolationism (Renka, Roosevelt’s Expansion of the Presidency). When Churchill reported in 1940 that the United Kingdom could no longer afford to pay for American weapons, Roosevelt used this opportunity to increase the United States’ influence in European affairs and lean his country slightly away from isolationism. Knowing Congress would oppose a loan to the United Kingdom, he created an entirely new program he called “lend-lease” (Greenstein 20).
Nash, Gary and Julie Jeffrey. "Foreign Policy in a Global Age." The American People Volume Two: Since 1865. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2011. 743-744. Print.
Hudson, William E. American Democracy in Peril: Eight Challenges to America's Future. Washington, DC: CQ, 2010. Print.
Don’t you always wonder what really happened at a particular event in history? Not the Semi-biased history, the real history. There is one distinct event that has always made me wonder and curious, World War Two. However, World War Two is such a comprehensive topic since all kinds of different things were going on in just the six years. In high school I took several history classes, we learned all about the great battles of the war, but didn’t really focus on the Home Front. However, since we didn’t really spend time on the Homefront doesn’t mean that it didn’t play a substantial role of the Success of America. Therefore, something that lacks in a history textbook is the importance the Home Front had on the outcome of the War. In this essay, will look deeper into how the Homefront, this military-industrial complex, had a significant impact not only in America’s success in World War 2 but the early years of the Cold War. However, before I begin I would like to share that I believe the Home front had long lasting impacts on society and history. During World War Two, millions Americans were sent across the globe fighting to defend our beliefs on what it meant to be an “American.” However, what history books didn’t mention is that although America was “fighting to defend democracy,” were we really democratic at home? The Homefront, which we will analyze thanks to the great primary source choice takes a deeper look into what it was like back home. We will also look closely at the broader context, this source has on history.
Janda, Kenneth, Jeffrey M. Berry and Jerry Goldman. The Challenge of Democracy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2004.
From September 1, 1939 to September 2, 1945, the world was witness to the most fatal war in our history. During this six year period, an estimated 78 million died. In 1940, The US, despite not having joined the war at the time, was at risk of being invaded. Franklin D. Roosevelt realized that without the help of the US, the war efforts of Great Britain and the rest of Europe were futile. However, American citizens were opposed to joining the war because of the horrors of World War 1 and the idea of those horrors being repeated. In an effort to convince the American public to take action, Roosevelt addressed the country on December 29, 1940. Roosevelt’s use of repetition and pathos within his speech, “The Great Arsenal of Democracy,” illustrated
As we approach the next Presidential election the topic of American foreign policy is once again in the spotlight. In this paper, I will examine four major objectives of U.S. foreign policy that have persisted throughout the twentieth century and will discuss the effect of each on our nation’s recent history, with particular focus on key leaders who espoused each objective at various times. In addition, I will relate the effects of American foreign policy objectives, with special attention to their impact on the American middle class. Most importantly, this paper will discuss America’s involvement in WWI, WWII, and the Cold War to the anticipated fulfillment of these objectives—democracy, manifest destiny, humanitarianism, and economic expansion.
Hudson, William E. American Democracy in Peril: Eight Challenges to America’s Future – Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2004.
The book that I have choosen for the book review assessment is called The Arsenal of Democracy by A.J. Baime. The era in which this book takes place in the United States history is the period before World War 2 and during World War 2. This was right when Henry Ford was building cars and the auto industry was booming in America. One has to know the buildup to World War 2 and the years prior to it to understand the global influences to the author's main point. Events like industrial changes, interchangeable parts, the great depression, the rise of nazis germany, America view of the european war, and the battle of resources in World War 2. The author ,A.J. Baime, is a journalist that works for the New York Time magazine,Popular Science,
...hose revolts should expect to be revolted against and understand why. Ultimately, this new democratic approach to a nation seems to be more trustworthy as Americans are not integrating into the culture of the Philippines, Cuba, or Puerto Rico but, allowing the people to be with just a certain amount of spheres of influence. I can not say for sure if America will reach the status of European nations but, I do not believe that they are afraid to try.
Throughout the fourteen years that remained in power Chávez followed strategy of introducing a socialist government in Venezuela in stages. According to Enrique Standish in the article titled “Venezuela Finally Turns Communist” it happened in four stages. The first stage consisted of obtaining t...
Now days democracy has been establish in every Latin America country except Cuba, which is still a socialist state. It seemed that every other alternative form of government such as Marxism or Leninism has failed and been replaced by democracy. Furthermore it looks like people in Latin American really enjoy democracy and its’ benefits, as they also consider it to be the best form of government. After the failure of authoritarian leaders and the military intervene their lives, Latin American citizens wanted to change their system into a more fair and honest system, democracy. Democracy is usually defined as a system of honesty, equality, freedom of rights, though for Latin America countries it means gains, welfare and patronage. Latin American did not work the democratic system properly as it should be and different obstacles keep the system away from being consolidated. Democracy in Latin America still face serious problems in matters as grinding poverty, huge social gaps, corruption, drug dealing, inefficient governments and most importantly governments who promote and use military. The real question is why democracy actually failed even though democracy is what people want. Paraguay is a case of failure in transition democracy because of the corruption and other things that will be argued in this essay. Paraguay and Ecuador are considered to be the only countries that democratization did not achieve consolidation, in differ from Chilli and Central American.