Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on drug policies
War on drugs policy
Influence of drugs in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on drug policies
The prohibitionist national policy towards drugs in U.S has been extremely contentious in the present times. After decades of the stance that costs billions how many each year, the paltry achievements and the countless negative externalities have led to a clamor for alternative policies instead of a “War on Drugs”. The proposition focuses on de-penalization of softer drugs and it is recommended to employ the consequent revenues towards creating a society wherein narcotics is treated as a health issue. The brief highlights the economic gains due to decrease in interdiction and legal regulation as well as social benefits through substantial decrease in acquisitive crime rates. The true consumer tendencies over drugs through study of the gateway drug theory and price-consumption responses are analyzed to highlight the flaws in the prohibitionist stance. Divergence between the nature of soft and hard drugs have been re-enforced to de-penalize only private usage of soft drugs while working towards treating hard drug addiction as a health issue through mandatory Opioid Substitution Therapy in prisons. Another recommendation to further the de-penalization policy has been made towards legislative reforms wherein non-violent drug offenders are made to undergo substance abuse treatment instead of incarceration. The focus on health and on liberalization for an overall again is deemed to be the more progressive stance. Analysis of the Policy Proposal 1. Economics of the Alternative Drug Strategy Federal spending over drug control in United States is approx. $15 billion annually of which 50% is over criminal justice expenditure (Mendeza, M., 2010). 10 million Americans use marijuana/month; Consequently, the drug seizures majorly involv... ... middle of paper ... ...ed that economically just cannabis decriminalization has got an enormous value and it wouldn’t be advisable to rope in other illicit drugs as well. Not only because hard drugs form a very small portion in drug trade in relation to marijuana, but also they bring with themselves numerous negative externalities such as extreme increase in consumption and health issues which shall be difficult to control as seen in Portugal (Consumption amplified by at almost double for hard drugs) However, to complement the soft drug de-penalization, hard drug users need to be assisted through compulsory substance treatment in prisons as well as through enactments that can rehabilitate instead of incarcerating the non-violent drug offenders. With the benefits outshining any possible ramifications, as established through strong data, the soft drug policy change is strongly recommended.
Jones, C. (2009). Ineffective, Unjust and Inhumane: Mandatory Prison Sentences for Drug Offences. The John Howard Society of Canada.
Drug use has been an ongoing problem in our country for decades. The use of drugs has been the topic of many political controversies throughout many years. There has been arguments that are for legalizing drugs and the benefits associated with legalization. Also, there are some who are opposed to legalizing drugs and fear that it will create more problems than solve them. Conservatives and liberals often have different opinions for controversial topics such as “the war on drugs,” but it is necessary to analyze both sides in order to gain a full understanding of their beliefs and to decide in a change in policy is in order.
A “drug-free society” has never existed, and probably will never exist, regardless of the many drug laws in place. Over the past 100 years, the government has made numerous efforts to control access to certain drugs that are too dangerous or too likely to produce dependence. Many refer to the development of drug laws as a “war on drugs,” because of the vast growth of expenditures and wide range of drugs now controlled. The concept of a “war on drugs” reflects the perspective that some drugs are evil and war must be conducted against the substances
Starting in 1970s, there has been an upward adjustment to sentencing making punishment more punitive and sentencing guidelines more strict. Martinson's (1974) meta-analyzies reviewed over 200 studies and concluded that nothing works in terms of rehabilitating prisoners. Rehabilitating efforts were discontinued. The War on Drugs campaign in 1970s incarcerated thousands of non-violent drug offenders into the system. In 1865, 34.3% of prison population were imprisoned for drug violation. By 1995, the percentage grew to 59.9% (figure 4.1, 104). Legislation policies like the Third Strikes laws of 1994 have further the severity of sentencing. The shift from rehabilitation to human warehouse marks the end of an era of trying to reform individuals and the beginnings of locking inmates without preparation of their release. Along with the reform in the 1970s, prosecutors are given more discretion at the expense of judges. Prosecutors are often pressure to be tough on crime by the socie...
...d self-medication. Finally we started to see what can be done around drug related crime and came with two schools of thought. The first stronger controls through preventing drug use by education, stronger law enforcement and treatment, which has been seen to work with use of heroine. The other school of thought, progressive decriminalisation looked to reduce inequalities, international law reform and then step-by-step decriminalisation. When looking through the research done it seems that stronger controls over drug use will not lower drug related crime as Bean has proven. The idea of progressive decriminalisation seems to be backed up by much of the modern research being done and would help stop the inequalities leading to drug use and can stop Goldstein’s idea around economic- compulsive crime and therefore would be the better idea in reducing drug related crime.
Substance abuse is a grim issue that affects the Canadian inmate population; it can be defined as overindulgence in or dependence on an addictive substance, especially alcohol or drugs. Within Canada, 80% of offenders entering the federal prison system are identified as having a substance abuse problem; this goes beyond mere indication of tougher drug legislation, it uncovers further discrepancy. Due to the immense majority of offenders affected by this complex mental illness, in addition to varied levels of individual cognitive ability. Consequently conventional abstinence-based treatment methods may not benefit all offenders. Untreated, this dynamic risk factor precursor’s future offending, as a study reveals dependency on illegal drugs is the single most serious risk for repeated offending. It has been established substance control is a far more feasible short term goal than outright eradication. With this ideology, the premise of one’s analysis will be on substance abuse control methodologies, gauging effectiveness and overall success in achieving its purpose.
The rationale behind the Dutch parliament’s decision was that the use of marijuana among the Dutch population was increasing, and rather than bog down the legal system, Dutch politicians decided to decriminalize marijuana (Bransten, para. 4). The other benefit of the policy, as the Dutch politicians and general public see it, is that “it isolates the hard drug market from the...
Harmful drugs are an issue that creates controversy just by being mentioned, let alone acted upon by public policy. Despite this, policy actors must address drugs, through action or inaction, for the chance to make our society safer and healthier. Scientists and policy makers tend to agree that some drugs can be harmful to their users (Nordegren, 2002), but there are two broad camps of opinion on how best to protect users from these negative effects. This paper will discuss the ways that the policies of harm reduction and prohibition are formed, and identify the key actors in this policy space.
For many years, a real push has been looming on the idea of legalizing now illegal drugs. This has become a hot debate throughout nations all over the world, from all walks of life. The dispute over the idea of decriminalizing illegal drugs is and will continue on as an ongoing conflict. In 2001, Drug decriminalization in all drugs, including cocaine and heroin, became a nationwide law in Portugal (Greenwald). Ethan Nadelman, essayist of “Think again: Drugs,” states his side of the story on the continuing criminalization of hard drugs, in which he stand to oppose. Whether it is for the good of human rights or not, decriminalizing drugs may be a good head start for a new beginning.
The war on drugs and the violence that comes with it has always brought around a hot debate about drug legalization. The amount of violence that is associated with drugs is a result from harsher drug laws and prohibition.
Hollersen, Wiebke. "Evaluating Drug Decriminalization in Portugal 12 Years Later." SPIEGEL ONLINE. N.p., 27 Mar. 2013. Web. 01 Dec. 2013.
Addiction shows a dark path for many. It affects everyone around the addict and often leads to arrest. This presents reasoning as to why addicts need to receive treatment opposed to simply locking them away. Treatment of addiction greatly benefits addicts and proves to aid the individual more than incarceration. The proven benefits show why enacting a solution for the aid of drug offenders needs to occur. Nonviolent drug offenders need to be granted extensive addiction treatment and counseling in the place of incarceration for their crimes.
Jag then launches into the main topic of discussion for his essay: Drug Legalization, by asking his readers if they would want any of their loved ones go to jail for mere possession of a hard drug. The author, assuming that no one would want a friend or family member to go to jail for hard drug possession, begins to make his case for drug decriminalization by stating that legalizing the possession of hard drugs could signify a drop in criminal arrests linked to having little amounts of drugs for personal use. Jag then goes on to claim that this is a crucial time for drug law reform, seeing as President Trump’s administration is anti drug legalization, and states that the government of the United States is better off focusing on policies and reforms that would push for new ways to treat drug addiction and deaths related to drug overdose.
The use of drugs by members of society is a problem for some individuals and a larger problem for the legal system. The use of drugs has created crime among the dealers of illegal substances in many forms, the classification of that substance determines the level of the crime, and with different charges the legal system acts accordingly. In the case of drugs and the legal systems, action against the use or distribution of those substances, many people have been incarcerated in the United States where the tax payers have to support the criminals that are housed for a period of time. In the United States over half a million individuals have been incarcerated for drug crimes and that number is growing annually. Society cannot continuously bare the burden of paying higher taxes to support the welfare of drug offenders if the number is only going to increase year after year. The suggestion has been made, which has been highly followed in some cases, that the use and distribution of illegal drug type substances should be legalized. The legalization of drugs, in various forms, is something that a large part of society do not have a problem supporting. The facts are that a large part of society use drugs on a fairly steady bases and that legalizing some forms of drugs could be beneficial to those individuals. The individuals that use drugs in society would not face jail time if caught and the ones that have been incarcerated would certainly be released, this would free up taxes to go toward other problems. It is theorized that legalization of drugs could get criminals off the streets and keep them out of jail so that the tax payers could pay less or the taxes could go toward more useful areas of focus. Many believe that legalization of...
Western society is undergoing a change, as progressive activists are working hard to bring attention to the fact that current laws against drugs are ineffective. Tens of thousands of people are convicted for drug offences each year, often seeing long prison sentences for relatively minor crimes. It seems as though addicts are incarcerated for drug possession, then released into a society without any help or support systems. This results in addicts continuing to abuse drugs, and being caught with possession again. There are many flaws with the current system regarding drug possession, most of which can be traced back to the unsuccessful policies of the War on Drugs and the increase in enforcement that followed. Fortunately, there are alternative