Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Drug control policy us
Drug control policy us
Drug control policy us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Drug control policy us
Western society is undergoing a change, as progressive activists are working hard to bring attention to the fact that current laws against drugs are ineffective. Tens of thousands of people are convicted for drug offences each year, often seeing long prison sentences for relatively minor crimes. It seems as though addicts are incarcerated for drug possession, then released into a society without any help or support systems. This results in addicts continuing to abuse drugs, and being caught with possession again. There are many flaws with the current system regarding drug possession, most of which can be traced back to the unsuccessful policies of the War on Drugs and the increase in enforcement that followed. Fortunately, there are alternative …show more content…
There would be fewer people being charged for the possession of drugs which would result in more space in jails all over. It would leave room for more serious offences such as murder or assault instead of something that should be considered a smaller offence such as drug possession. It was reported by CBC news that in 2016, around 55,000 offences were reported to the police just relating to marijuana possession. They also stated that the year before that in 2015 there were 6,000 fewer of the same offences reported to the police. Consuming drugs and being charged for possession continues to increase in Canada,which is creating a problem for jails across the country as they are forced to deal with …show more content…
Many of the large cartels have accrued extraordinary power thanks to the money made off the streets by selling a product that is unavailable elsewhere. This monopoly on drug dealing would be shattered in an instant if the government stepped in to legalize drugs. As it stands, there are no regulatory bodies overseeing the production of drugs, and the current increase in cases of Fentanyl being found in other drugs demonstrates the dangers inherent in trusting unscrupulous criminal organizations. The legalization of drugs would see the cartels hemorrhage clients as buyers would have access to safer and more convenient sources that would be subject to government regulation. Once cut off from their major source of money, cartels would see their influence and power decrease as they would be forced to focus on less-profitable
Within our society, there is a gleaming stigma against the drug addicted. We have been taught to believe that if someone uses drugs and commits a crime they should be locked away and shunned for their lifetime. Their past continues to haunt them, even if they have changed their old addictive ways. Everyone deserves a second chance at life, so why do we outcast someone who struggles with this horrible disease? Drug addiction and crime can destroy lives and rip apart families. Drug courts give individuals an opportunity to repair the wreckage of their past and mend what was once lost. Throughout this paper, I will demonstrate why drug courts are more beneficial to an addict than lengthy prison sentences.
A “drug-free society” has never existed, and probably will never exist, regardless of the many drug laws in place. Over the past 100 years, the government has made numerous efforts to control access to certain drugs that are too dangerous or too likely to produce dependence. Many refer to the development of drug laws as a “war on drugs,” because of the vast growth of expenditures and wide range of drugs now controlled. The concept of a “war on drugs” reflects the perspective that some drugs are evil and war must be conducted against the substances
And if marijuana is legal, they will have a harder time to control these drugs dealers. The drugs dealers will try to introduce more substances and people will try it. I don’t see any good if we legalize marijuana or any kind of drugs. But DEA agents will have to work harder and be smarter to deal with all these drugs users. It’s not going to be easy, they will need to come up with new tricks and plans to try to keep these drugs users in control. Because I think that if marijuana is legal, other drugs in the future will be legal too. Like I said earlier, as long as human have an addiction toward something, there will be new substances introduced. One day, there will be no way to control these drugs users and dealers. Also, when you’re on drugs, I don’t think you who what you’re doing. You might think that you know what you’re doing, but I doubt you do. At that time, people will make choices that they don’t want to and how are police officers going to punish them? It not only make DEA agents jobs harder but it will make everyone life harder. I hope DEA agents will come up with better plans as time go on to control these drugs users and
In Australia the Government uses three methods to tackle drugs; Demand reduction, supply reduction and harm minimization. Needle and syringe programs are under harm minimization category. Supply reduction is focused on drug dealers and drug makers and is brought about by law enforcement. In the Demand reduction method it is tried to decrease the number of people taking drugs through anti-drug advertisements and campaigns, legislation, rehabilitation centers. On the other hand harm minimization recognizes the fact that drugs can never be eradicated fro...
the only way to make money. Minimum wage salaries can not compare to the huge
Legalizing marijuana would help control the impact on our court system which is currently overwhelmed. Law enforcement locks up 750,000 people a year for marijuana use which causes court overload and wasting jail space (Marijuana). Half the people in jail are not in there for the drug use; they are in there for possession of marijuana (Marijuana). Those Capps 2 charges could lead to more time in jail and more cost to the government. This makes the prison system less efficient than it already is.
We cannot afford to keep using the same approach in hopes of diminishing our drug problem in the United States. In a study posted on RAND.org, the author Jonathan P. Caulkins compares many methods we can use to help with drug crime. The first graph compares federal mandatory minimum sentences, conventional enforcement at all levels of government, and treatment of heavy users. Conventional enforcement prevented around thirty kilo grams of cocaine from being used, while federal mandatory minimums prevented around forty kilograms from being used. Treatment of heavy users blew both of the other methods out of the water.
Ever since marijuana’s introduction to the United States of America in 1611, controversy of the use and legalization of the claimed-to-be Schedule I drug spread around the nation. While few selective states currently allow marijuana’s production and distribution, the remaining states still skepticize the harmlessness and usefulness of this particular drug; therefore, it remains illegal in the majority of the nation. The government officials and citizens of the opposing states believe the drug creates a threat to citizens due to its “overly-harmful” effects mentally and physically and offers no alternate purposes but creating troublesome addicts hazardous to society; however, they are rather misinformed about marijuana’s abilities. While marijuana has a small amount of negligible effects to its users, the herbal drug more importantly has remarkable health benefits, and legalizing one of the oldest and most commonly known drugs would redirect America’s future with the advantages outweighing the disadvantages.
For many years, a real push has been looming on the idea of legalizing now illegal drugs. This has become a hot debate throughout nations all over the world, from all walks of life. The dispute over the idea of decriminalizing illegal drugs is and will continue on as an ongoing conflict. In 2001, Drug decriminalization in all drugs, including cocaine and heroin, became a nationwide law in Portugal (Greenwald). Ethan Nadelman, essayist of “Think again: Drugs,” states his side of the story on the continuing criminalization of hard drugs, in which he stand to oppose. Whether it is for the good of human rights or not, decriminalizing drugs may be a good head start for a new beginning.
The business of buying and selling drugs comes with high transactions costs. The dealer cannot risk being caught or scammed so he buys a gun to defend himself from the police and other dealers. The buyer of the drugs does not to be killed for his money if the dealer gets greedy so he buys a gun for himself. Now we have two people that if it came down to it, would kill for their crack rocks. Also, if a buyer got a bad crack rock or got less than he paid for, he cannot go the police or file a complaint. He must take matters into his own hands resulting in violence. If drugs were legalized, they would be safer in the sense that the crack-head that needs his daily crack rock would not have to deal directly with dangerous drug dealers and criminals and risk getting shot for his money. Instead, he can go down to the local “drug store” and get his drugs safely.
Many feel today we are loosing the war on drugs. People consider legalization unnecessary. They feel that it will increase the amount of drug use throughout the world. They state that in many cases, drug users who have quit quit because of trouble with the law. Legalization would eliminate the legal forces that discourage the users from using or selling drugs. They also say that by making drugs legal, the people who have never tried drugs for fear of getting caught by the law will have no reason to be afraid anymore and will become users (Potter 1998).
The arguments that I have just laid out are not perfect and they have some apparent flaws that some philosophers would strongly disagree with, while there are other arguments that some of the great philosophers would agree with. I will critique the arguments that I have just laid out using the perspective of three different philosophers who all have their own ideas of how the state should function and the role of the citizen. The three philosophers that I will use in this critique will be Karl Marx, John Stewart Mill, and John Locke. The reason why I picked these three philosophers is because they all agree with some aspects of my writing, while disagreeing with others. One will disagree with the role of the state and the citizens, but agree with legalizing recreational drug use, while the other two will agree with the role of the state and citizens, but disagree with legalizing drug use.
With marijuana being illegal, keeping crime-related activities under control costs the United States approximately twenty billion dollars per year (Sledge). According to Brian Bremner and Vincent Del Giudice, “A 2010 study by the libertarian Cato Institute, forecasted that states could save $17.4 billion annually from reduced drug enforcement costs and increased tax revenue, assuming marijuana production and sales were legal nationwide” (11). Several law enforcement hours are exhausted with pursing, questioning, and arresting citizens that are in possession of or consuming marijuana. There would be a decrease in the number of misdemeanor possession cases that are pending hearing. These cases would be dismissed, decreasing costs associated with each case.
Leading to an increase in drug experimentation by the youth and an increase in crack houses, where most laced drugs are produced. There is a reason why these drugs are illegal and it 's because of their harmful effects and the damage they cause the human body. Drug users, are often recognized as people who commit crimes, murder, rape, and other violence including burglary. With drug laws, it creates a fear in people of getting in trouble with the law and is a major reason to not use drugs. The legalization of drugs would not lower crimes rates as there would be more and more addicts as well as large black markets for drugs. Although these drug users commit crimes to obtain these drugs, it is obvious to see they would still be committing these crimes to obtain the drug even if it is legalized. Either way, a crime is still being committed they just have an easier way to steal the drug from someone. Which means the crime rates would start to rise, leading to the population of prisoners increasing, which also leads to the government spending more money on organizing jail facilities to hold these prisoners. One state in particular where marijuana is now legal, has started to come to the realization that maybe it wasn’t a good idea to leaglize this drug. Kevin A. Sabet, Ph.D., an assistant professor at the University of Florida and President of SAM points out that,
Drug abuse has been a hot topic for our society due to how stimulants interfere with health, prosperity, and the lives of others in all nations. All drugs have the potential to be misapplied, whether obtained by prescription, over the counter, or illegally. Drug abuse is a despicable disease that affects many helpless people. Majority of those who are beset with this disease go untreated due to health insurance companies who neglect and discriminate this issue. As an outcome of missed opportunities of treatments, abusers become homeless, very ill, or even worst, death.