Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The process of alternative dispute resolutions
The process of alternative dispute resolutions
The process of alternative dispute resolutions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The process of alternative dispute resolutions
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Recently there have been many moves to encourage the use of ADR, this
eases the burden on the judicial system and helps both sides in theory
come to a reasonable settlement without the costs of a court case. The
term ADR can be described as
Ÿ Dispute resolution procedures utilized outside of court
In order to ensure
Ÿ Cost effective litigation
And to
Ÿ Help prevent litigation reaching the courts
Litigation itself has a number of drawbacks as a way of solving civil
disputes; it does not necessarily always lead to the best result for
both sides
Ÿ It is expensive and slow; it also gives a clear advantage to the
wealthier party who afford to string out the proceedings until the
other runs out of money.
Ÿ It is unsuited to disputes involving technical issues, where the
judges may have no practical experience.
Ÿ It is an adversarial system, the court room is like a battlefield,
each side tries to gain as much as possible while giving away as
little as possible, This is done without regard to what could be a
fair solution.
Ÿ Litigation tends to destroy personal and professional relationships
Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United Kingdom revolves around
1. Negotiation
2. Mediation
3. Conciliation
4. Arbitration
5. Tribunals
1. Negotiation
DEFINITION- Negotiation is a voluntary, informal and do parties to
reach a mutually acceptable agreement use an unstructured process
NEUTRAL None
ROLE OF LAWYERS- Lawyers can be appointed by parties to represent them
during the process
ROLE OF PARTIES- They can represent themselv...
... middle of paper ...
...g about personal matters,
In March 2003 the government announced plans for a comprehensive
reform of the tribunal system, bringing together the ten major
tribunals and many smaller ones within a single framework. The details
have yet to be announced, but are designed to improve administration
and increase public accessibility, so that administrative justice
acquires a status comparable with that of civil justice and criminal
justice.
In conclusion alternative dispute resolution is becoming more and more
prevalent in this country today. This is aimed at easing the burden in
the civil justice system. The Woof report advocated ADR as a vital
instrument in repairing public trust and confidence in the system.
However if ADR fails the parties will ultimately have to go to court
and a judge will decide the case.
Hames, D. (2011). Negotiation: Closing Deals, Settling Disputes, and Making Team Decisions. Sage Publications. Retrieved 08 25, 2013
Roberson, Cliff, Harvey Wallace, and Gilbert B. Stuckey. Procedures in the Justice System. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2010. Print.
Negotiation is a fundamental process used in resolving conflicts, making business deals, and in managing working relationships with others. Negotiations occur for two reasons: (1) to resolve a problem or dispute between parties, or (2) to create something new that neither party could do on its own.
Stuckey, G., Roberson, C., & Wallace, H. (n.d.). Bookshelf : Link to “Procedures in the Justice System, VitalSource for Kaplan University”. Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com/books/9781269223119
M. E. McGuinness (Eds.), Words Over War: Mediation and Arbitration to Prevent Deadly Conflict (pp. 293-320). New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Ott, Marvin C. "Mediation as a Method of Conflict Resolution: Two Cases." International Organization 26.04 (1972): 595-618. JSTOR. Web. 3 Dec. 2013.
As disputes are inevitable in any society, it is important for people to always improve the solutions to disputes. Usually, when a dispute becomes severe and unsolvable simply by negotiation, two parties will go to court for better solutions. In Canada, we have 2 systems that run parallel: administrative tribunal and the court system. However, administrative tribunals are not part of the court system; instead they are independent government agencies which are established under legislation (either federal or provincial) to implement legislative policy. Unlike court where the judge makes decision based on common law, administrative tribunals are less formal.
A group can only be called a team if the members are actively working together toward a common goal. A team must have the capability to set goals, make decisions, solve problems, and share responsibilities. For a team to be successful, trust must be earned between its members by being consistent and reliable (Temme & Katzel, 2005). When more than one person is working on a particular task, inconsistent views or opinions commonly arise. People come from different backgrounds and live through different life experiences therefore, even when working towards a common goal, they will not always see eye to eye. Major conflict that is not dealt with can devastate a team or organization (Make Conflict Work, 2008). In some situations, conflict can be more constructive than destructive. Recognizing the difference between conflict that is constructive to the team and conflict that is destructive to the team is important. Trying to prevent the conflict is not always the best way to manage conflict when working within a team setting. Understanding conflict, what causes it, and how to resolve conflict effectively, should consume full concentration.
Many people enjoy working or participating in a group or team, but when a group of people work together chances are that conflicts will occur. Hazleton describes conflict as the discrepancy between what is the perceived reality and what is seen as ideal (2007). “We enter into conflicts reluctantly, cautiously, angrily, nervously, confidently- and emerge from them battered, exhausted, sad, satisfied, triumphant. And still many of us underestimate or overlook the merits of conflict- the opportunity conflict offers every time it occurs” (Schilling, nd.). Conflict does not have to lead to a hostile environment or to broken relationships. Conflict if resolved effectively can lead to a positive experience for everyone involved. First, there must be an understanding of the reasons why conflicts occur. The conflict must be approached with an open mind. Using specific strategies can lead to a successful resolution for all parties involved. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument states “there are five general approaches to dealing with conflict. The five approaches are avoidance, accommodation, competition, compromise, and collaboration. Conflict resolution is situational and no one approach provides the best or right approach for all circumstances” (Thomas, 2000).
Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR refers to a number of various processes that can be used to resolve legal disputes other than by litigation. Recently, methods of dispute resolution which focus on arbitration, mediation and negotiation as an alternative to adjudication have gained notoriety. This notoriety may have been caused by the public perception that ADR methods are less expensive, more efficient, and more satisfactory than the normal traditional course of litigation. The goals of establishing these processes to resolve disputes as an alternative to more formal legal processes include: 1) to make the regular court system more efficient, less costly and more responsive to the needs of the litigants; 2) to offer alternative methods of dispute resolution in addition to the regular court system; and 3) to provide public education about the available alternatives.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Alternative Dispute Resolution. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) involves dispute resolution processes and techniques that fall outside of the government judicial process. There has been moves against ADR in the past by entities of many political parties and their associates, despite this, ADR has gained inclusive acceptance among both the broad community and the legal profession in past years. In fact, many courts now entail parties to remedy to ADR of some type, usually mediation, before allowing the parties' cases to be tried. The increasing attractiveness of ADR can be clarified by the increasing caseload of traditional courts, the perception that ADR imposes fewer costs than litigation, a preference for confidentiality, and the desire of some parties to obtain larger control over the selection of the individual or individuals who will decide their dispute.
Negotiation is the process enacted by two or more parties, to resolve a difference and ideally create a solution benefiting all involved parties. Negotiation is all about knowledge, strategies, your preferred stance taken in the process, how much concession you can afford to yield, and what your ultimate goal is. Is your goal to take all the share and value of the available resources? Or are you the kind of person/company that is willing to take the extra mile to create equal value for both parties, ultimately adding value to the relationship? The process will always depend on the company, each team players' personality, trust and situation. A good negotiator will study their opponent, gain all knowledge needed and be able to adapt to the nature of the deal in short notice. We use the method of negotiation to solve problems and disputes taking place in business, government, between countries, and even in our day-to-day life, such as marriage and divorce, parenting and family.
Mediation is a form of the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Mediation is a process which it assists disputed parties to arrive to a mutually agreed resolution without going to court. As the out of court problem solving approach, mediation is a more convenient way for parties which trying to avoid the hassle and loving some flexibility from the more rigid court procedure. Mediation can be said as an informal process of which parties during this process is encouraged to work together among the disputed parties in good faith in order to solve their problems and disputes at a lower financial cost and it consume lesser time as opposed to the court procedure. Mediation recently has become more common as one of dispute resolution process especially for disputes which have relations to divorce matter, child custody or even for child visitation especially for its privacy and confidentiality.
It is argued that the key factor in ADR application is that all it’s’ method are designed to assist the disputing parties resolve their differences in a manner that is creative and most suited to the particular dispute. Yet these achievements are not sweeping enough to conclude that the adversarial procedures are irrelevant. Though some people see ADR methods as supplanting the adversarial system, but these thoughts could only hold water where the courts in many jurisdictions are unable to resolve all disputes in a manner appealing to litigants, but until then ADR methods will be designated as collaborative dispute resolution system with the conventional litigation system.
Most people believe that conflict is something negative. In many cases conflict can be. Whether1 a small dispute between two neighbors or a global conflict that leads to war, conflict is inevitable. Disagreement is a part of human nature. We are a society of individuals working together to achieve common goals. How we handle conflict determines whether the outcome is a negative or a positive one. If properly handled, conflict may lead to growth, maturity, and understanding of one another. If not, conflict at school could lead to broken ties, at home to hurt feelings, and in the workplace to discouragement. These negative outcomes may be avoided when conflict is handled properly. There is no single technique that works best for settling conflicts. What works in a school setting might not work at an office or at home. Regardless where or with whom the conflict is with, a person must examine themselves, his or her intentions and more importantly, core values.