All Quiet On The Western Front: A Comparative Analysis

724 Words2 Pages

To truly understand the life of a soldier, one must go through the struggles of wartime combat. The reality of participating in war is that there is not only a physical aspect that changes a soldier, but mental aspects too. The Things They Carried and All Quiet On The Western Front both portray a number of similar topics. O’brien and Remarque interpret the speculation of wartime in dramatic yet necessary measures as betrayal of youth, the transformation of man to animal, and the horrors of war.
O’brien and Remarque expose the idea of betrayal of youth. As young as these men are they are not mentally nor physically steady to fight and to stay alive. They were never divulged how difficult their lives would become so they prayed for their lives, “Promises to themselves and to God, hoping not to die” (O’brien 19). While in war, soldiers retain their …show more content…

These men are reckless and catastrophically harmful to anyone who crosses their path, “They searched the villages not caring, frisking children, and setting fires” (O’brien 15). The men do not care about anything and cause vexations because nobody can stop them without their humanity. Once their humanity slipped away their mental status was questionable due to the decisions they were making. While on the battlefield the soldiers are having internal conflicts with themselves and are acting out as if they are uncontrollable animals out in the wild. Remarque wrote “At last the beast got wise to it, or perhaps they’ve scented the blood” (Remarque 103), The men’s savagery is taking over the best of them and they are killing ruthlessly. They are turning into their inner animal and using their five senses leaving their humanity behind them. As all of the horror occurs, the savagery continues, these men witness and perform unspeakable acts and just maybe start to realize the aftermath of how out of control they

Open Document