Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alexander the great essays
Iliad of Alexander the Great
Iliad of Alexander the Great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alexander the great essays
Alexander: Theatrical Cut (2004) The film, Alexander, is a historic drama about Alexander the Great, who became legendary for his military prowess. Ptolemy I, a Macedonian general, narrated throughout the film. Moments of Alexander’s childhood were shown, such as his difficult relationship with his mother, Olympias, and his father, King Philip II of Macedon. After Alexander became King of Macedonia, he sets out to conquer the Persian Empire. He continued his eight-year campaign across East Asia, before returning home to Babylon. In the film, Alexander struggled to convince his army to continue to follow him across Asia. It was after the Battle of Hydaspes in India that encouraged Alexander to return home. The film also showed Alexander’s …show more content…
The film showed that Macedonia was a monarchy with a king and queen. For example, the king of Macedonia was King Philip and the queen was Queen Olympias. Also, marriages were displayed as alliances and as a way to secure the place of a throne. For example, Olympias told Alexander to marry a Macedonian woman and have a son. The reason for this was because King Philip II married Eurydice and Eurydice had a son. Olympias was afraid that King Philip II will chose Eurydice’s son as his successor.
Moreover, art was depicted in the film. Cave paintings were used in the film that represented Herakles and Achilles. In a scene, King Philip II of Macedon used cave paintings to teach life lessons to Alexander. In addition, stone statues were depicted in the film. For example, many stone headed statues were displayed on top of pillars when the scene focused on Ptolemy I narrating. Vases were presented in the film too. The artwork on vases showed past historic
…show more content…
However, the setting of Babylon was well-done where the film displayed the artwork used in Babylon and the geometric buildings. Even so, the film did a poor job with the setting of the Battle of Hydaspes, where Alexander the Great and Indians fought in the jungle instead of the Hydaspes River. As with costume designs, the film did all right. For example, in the scene where King Philip II was about to be murdered by his personal guard, Olympias wore a red dress while the others around her wore white. This represented that Olympias stood out in Macedonian society. Another example was the short tunics Alexander and his warrior wore during battle. When it came to the discussion of using the film as an effective teaching tool in the classroom, many people might agree that the film isn’t capable because of its lack of historic accuracy. It barely discusses the reason why Alexander was so “great”, and it briefly went over Alexander’s accomplishments. There were only two battle scenes, and it didn’t show Alexander conquering other areas. Even though the film was three hours, the film focused a lot on Alexander’s relationships. In addition, the film included some nudity and men forcing women into
Throughout history, there are many scenes that are repeated in different mediums. Many of these scenes begin as stories. The image of Laocoon was first depicted with words as a story told about the Trojan War. Laocoon is a Trojan priest who had warned against the acceptance of the wooden horse. The gods, who are on the side of the Greeks, send two serpents to kill Laocoon. They first attack his two sons, and when he rushes to save them they attack and kill him (Lee 37). The snakes then return to the citadel of Minerva for safety. A famous depiction of this scene can be found in the illuminated manuscript Vergilius Vaticanus. This illuminated manuscript was done sometime around the 5th century (Wright 91). It was similar to many illuminated manuscripts of the time in that the scribe wrote out the poem, and left designated space for the artist to depict an image that relates to that part of the poem(Wright **). While it is believed that many of the images were copies of images from rolls depicting the same story, the artist did have opportunity to alter images and depict images as they saw fit. The artist that painted the Laocoon scene reveals Laocoon as a strong tragic hero by depicting him the second time as large, nude, muscular and bearded. This view is intensified when compared to the Roman/Hellenistic sculptural group of Laocoon and his sons.
Have you heard of a man named Alexander the Great, the famous historical figure? There are many amazing stories about him explaining the courageous things he had accomplished. However, if you learn more about him and his accomplishments you will soon realized the real person Alexander was. Alexander the Great, ruler of his empire was in fact not great as his title states. The definition of great is a person who shows concern for others, has leadership and shows intelligence. Alexander didn’t show any of these characteristics therefore he doesn’t deserve the title of “great”.
Alexander the Great was the son of Philip Macedonia. Alexander the Great was a big admirer of Greek culture during his time. During Alexander the Great time in history he spread the Greek culture through the Middle East and North Africa. Alexander the Great past away at an early age and after his death the Greeks took over the Romans.
When looking back through history one cannot help but be awed at the artistic accomplishments of the past. There is no greater evidence of this then the artistic achievements of the Greek artists who made some of the world's greatest works of art. Two iconic figures that represent theses changes are the Dying Warrior from the archaic period and the Dying Gallic Trumpeter from the Hellenistic period. As important, as the similarities are between these two pieces it is also important to note the differences that occur alongside the Greek culture.
Lastly, Alexander was an incredibly poor sport when it came to his victories over other cities and/or countries. There are multitudes of people who think of Alexander the great as an outstanding leader and respectful
One of the reasons for Alexander’s military success is because he was brought up by a great military leader. Alexander’s father was King Phillip II of Macedonia, a great military leader himself. When Alexander was a young man, around 16, his father realized his potential and pulled him out of school and put him out on the field to learn (McGill). He also got him a tutor, one of the best in all of history, Aristotle. Alexander’s young life will prove to be one of the largest reasons for his...
...r. "Ancient Greece." Gardner's art through the ages the western perspective. 13th ed., Backpack ed. Boston, Mass.: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010. 101, 123,129. Print.
Life of Alexander the Great of Macedonia is one of the most remarkable Ancient Greece stories that prevail even in this present era. The ancient Greek sources clearly identify the life of Alexander as the one which broaden our understanding about the heroes of the Ancient times. Plutarch parallel lives are one of the sources that equip classical study and any other studies with necessary details of how Alexander manifested his life as an Ancient Greek hero. However the invention of motion pictures (cinema) had created another dimension in analysing Life of Alexander. Firstly Robert Rossen released a life of Alexander a nearly half century ago, which did not make much effort addition to what literature has far reached, and it was argued that his film consist some inaccuracies. Oliver Stone, a screenwriter also wrote a Life of Alexander (2004-2005) and it reached its hype as a cinematic presentation and it also depicts nearly accurate historical information about the life of Alexander the great. Oliver Stone’s Life of Alexander remains the controversial presentation when studying the Life of Alexander. This short essay will critically investigate how Stone went about constructing his ‘biopic’ of Alexander, including a consideration of which episodes were included as well as those which were excluded.
Alexander was a smart man and there was one main person to thank for that, his father. Philip II, knowing that someday his son would be a powerful figure arranged for none other than Aristotle to be Alexander’s tutor. Alexander grew to love his tutor almost as much as his father. Alexander’s favorite book was the Iliad by Homer, it was a story about some of the things he hoped to do when he got older, such as fight in wars. As a youth Alexander also enjoyed hunting and martial arts. Alexander feared that by the time he became king there would be nothing left for him to conquer.
Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...
Few historical figures stand out in the same degree as that of Alexander the Great. He was a warrior by 16, a commander at age 18, and was crowned King of Macedon by the time he was 20 years old. He did things in his lifetime that others could only dream about. Alexander single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in just over a decade. There were many attributes that made Alexander “Great.” He was a brilliant strategist and an inspired leader; he led by example and was a conqueror at heart. In looking at his early childhood, accession to the throne, conquests, marriage, and death one can see why Alexander the Great is revered in historical contexts as one of the greatest figures of all time.
Alexander the Great was only 20 years when his father Philip of Macedon died. Even though he was a young man, he had an unusual talent for politics and military tactics. After his father’s death, Alexander moved to continue Philip’s invasion of Persia. In the ten years of his war campaigns, Alexander conquered a large portion of the then-known world. (Judge & Langdon, 2012.)
The film Alexander by Oliver Stone, is based on the life of Alexander the Great, King of Macedonia, one of the greatest military leaders in the history of warfare. The story begins around 283 BC, with Ptolemy, who narrates throughout the film. The film offers a disclaimer at the end of the credits signifying that the film is “inspired by certain historical events,” and that some of those events have been moved around a bit. Alexander was not made to be a historical or archaeological documentary.
The ancient Greek historian Diodorus Siculus said “During the twenty-four years of his [Phillip II] reign as King of Macedonia, Phillip built his own kingdom up into the greatest power in Europe … he bequeathed a military establishment of such size and quality that his son Alexander was enabled to overthrow the Persian empire … these achievements were not the work of fortune but of his own force of character, for this king stands out above others for his military acumen, personal courage, and intellectual brilliance.” Despite this, Alexander believed that his success was the work of divine forces. He called himself the son of Zeus, and likened his bloodline to that of Achilles and Heracles, modeling his behavior after them. Alexander’s success was also due to the methods
In conclusion, I believe Alexander is one of the best political leader and the best general in the history. He managed to conquer and govern a huge territory with his wisdom. He didn’t win wars with soldiers, he won with strategy. Without a question, he was the most successful leader in the history. He knew how t rule and how to make people obedient and it is the main reason that he was very influential. These qualities made him live forever in stories, epics, and