Alexander The Great Battle Analysis

276 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Alexander the great military tactics

Equifinality proposes that multiple paths can lead to the same outcomes (Nassar, 2007). There were many strategies that Alexander could have chosen as the battle plan to defeat Darius and his massive troops. In this battle, communication created an effective and efficient strategy for the success that Alexander the Great’s army had against the Persians led by Darius. When you have a disadvantage to overcome, you must have communication as the top form of weaponry. Alexander was at a disadvantage in the size of his army by 4 to 1 (Nassar, 2007). However, he used the minimal number of resources to his advantage by making sure that he could execute the communicated plan more clearly and with precision. This was something that the larger army

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between Diodorus And Plutarch

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander believed he was a divine mediator for the world. In other words, he believed he was chosen by god to solely lead the world. Thus, Arrian wanted to emphasize Alexander's arrogance because he believed that he was god-like and should rule over everyone. Furthermore, after Alexander’s death, he still had extravagant plans for his empire. Alexanders wanted ridiculous projects to be completed. He wanted to build one thousand war ships to fight the Carthaginians and other African nations, and create cities and populate them with his people in Europe and Asia to expand his empire. In Diodorus’ Alexander’s Last Plans, He explains Alexander’s final wishes from a realistic standpoint. Diodorus writes, “When theses plans had been read, the Macedonians, although they applauded the name of Alexander, nevertheless saw that the projects were extravagant and decided to carry out none of those that had been mentioned.” Diodorus emphasized that Alexander believed his people should continue to follow him and his beliefs long after his death. The projects in Alexander's will spoke about were time consuming, and extravagant. Furthermore, many people did not share Alexanders beliefs of world

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    Have you heard of a man named Alexander the Great, the famous historical figure? There are many amazing stories about him explaining the courageous things he had accomplished. However, if you learn more about him and his accomplishments you will soon realized the real person Alexander was. Alexander the Great, ruler of his empire was in fact not great as his title states. The definition of great is a person who shows concern for others, has leadership and shows intelligence. Alexander didn’t show any of these characteristics therefore he doesn’t deserve the title of “great”.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Alexander The Great

    117 Words  | 1 Pages

    Darius had an advantage over Alexander the Great, he had more troops, better resources, and he chose the battle field. Although Darius had the advantage he was not as smart as Alexander. Alexander had good communication with his troops; he planned according, in addition he was well organized before the battled. He did not stray away from his plan he stuck to it. Alexander troops were heavily armed they moved in formation, and they were shield with their long spears they stayed close together and moved in formation. In addition he did not have all his troops engaged in the battle at once he planned an awesome attack strategy that won him and his troops the war.

    Read More

  • How did Alexander the Great Accomplish his Military Feats at Such a Young Age?

    529 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the reasons for Alexander’s military success is because he was brought up by a great military leader. Alexander’s father was King Phillip II of Macedonia, a great military leader himself. When Alexander was a young man, around 16, his father realized his potential and pulled him out of school and put him out on the field to learn (McGill). He also got him a tutor, one of the best in all of history, Aristotle. Alexander’s young life will prove to be one of the largest reasons for his...

    Read More

  • Strategic Advancements during the Napoleonic Wars

    2257 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the beginning the acts of war were always simple and straight forward, where both sides would choose their weapons, get in single file lines, proceed to ...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Alexander And The Terrible No Great, Very Bad Day

    1451 Words  | 3 Pages

    Having a bad day can seem daunting, perhaps causing feelings like nothing can go right regardless of what you do. This seems to be the case in “Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day.” No matter what Alexander does, the day just doesn’t get better. From breakfast all the way to bed time, Alexander is miserable. Many things that Alexander experiences are avoidable through a better outlook on life and proper parenting.

    Read More

  • Alexander: The Not So Great

    1861 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Controversy Analysis

    658 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the archaeological world, a new controversy has been stirred up by King Philip II of Macedon, also known as Alexander the Great’s father, and whether his skeletal remains are in Tomb I or Tomb II at Vergina in Macedonia.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Arrogance

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although Alexander the Great of Macedonia’s actions as a conqueror mark him as a great leader to many, they are marred by an arrogance which is what gives him the label of a bad leader. This cocksure behavior increased as the years went on and led to the intolerable pride Alexander carried marking him as an unsatisfactory leader from the present perspective. Alexander acted brashly just to earn glory and did not consider the consequences of if he had been injured. In The Battle of Gaugamela it mentions Alexander leading his army “with Alexander himself at the head of them, vigorously pressed the assault” (Arrian, The Battle of Gaugamela). This action of his is a cry for glory, not for Macedonia, but just for Alexander.

    Read More

  • Alexander’s Vast Accomplishments as a Conquerer

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander began his military campaign and his rule much where his father left off. Whether or not it was his aim, this created a sense of normality for the men that was part of his father’s regime. Alexander’s position as a warrior-king who stood side-by-side among his men also served to create respect among his peers. Gradually, as Alexander conquered more Persian land, he began to adopt the policies of Persian rulers. Alexander’s change in policy extended beyond just political roles, he gave consideration to the local gods in many of the lands that he conquered. Eventually, Alexander brought people in from the conquered nations to serve under him.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Film Analysis

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    The film, Alexander, is a historic drama about Alexander the Great, who became legendary for his military prowess. Ptolemy I, a Macedonian general, narrated throughout the film. Moments of Alexander’s childhood were shown, such as his difficult relationship with his mother, Olympias, and his father, King Philip II of Macedon. After Alexander became King of Macedonia, he sets out to conquer the Persian Empire. He continued his eight-year campaign across East Asia, before returning home to Babylon. In the film, Alexander struggled to convince his army to continue to follow him across Asia. It was after the Battle of Hydaspes in India that encouraged Alexander to return home. The film also showed Alexander’s

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Thesis

    812 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great Alexander the Great was an amazing warrior with numerous talents. He was a force to be reckoned with and the other armies would have a rough time trying to win over Alexander the Great. Alexander the Great was a student of Aristotle, a philosopher, which means he was intelligent enough to read. He read Homer’s iliad when inspired him to to become a fighter.

    Read More

  • Essay On Alexander The Great

    574 Words  | 2 Pages

    Have you ever wondered why Alexander from Macedonia is called Alexander the Great. According to history, it is because he is the most glorious general in the history who conquered Persia, Greece, Egypt and Babylon in a very inexperienced age. He became the commander of Macedonian armies at age eighteen and the king of Macedonia at age twenty. After six years of preparation, he conquered the great Persian empire. Unfortunately, he died at age thirty-three. He would have conquered many lands if he hadn’t died at a such young age. He was a legend and an icon for great kings like Charlemagne, Julius Caesar, and Pompey. World’s most famous generals tried to compete with him but they couldn’t accomplish. After years, his tomb

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Father

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    There were many battles between Darius and Alexander, in which Darius would usually flee, leaving victory for Alexander. The battles that Alexander fought usually had high death tolls and his tactics were seen as harsh (Behnke). In a message to Darius, Alexander says, “It is war that will determine the boundaries of our respective empired and each shall have what fortunes of tomorrow assign to us,” (Behnke). The last battle was at Gaugamela. As a result for the battle of Gaugamela, king Darius fled. The Persians lost about fifty thousand soldiers, and the Macedonians lost one thousand. Alexander then took his troop and marched into Persepolis and declared himself the new king, which then led to the downfall of the Persian Empire

    Read More

  • The Iliad Research Paper

    1096 Words  | 3 Pages

    In addition to providing guidance information, the Iliad was also a major source of battle strategy. Emperor Alexander the Great of the Hellenistic

    Read More

More about Alexander The Great Battle Analysis

Open Document