Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leader traits
Operations strengths and weaknesses
Leadership characteristics essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leader traits
Alan Thompson proclaims himself as a sheep herder of sorts. Through our interview with the man himself, our group has found an individual that embodies the leadership qualities that this course has taught us. Alan’s time as Director of Operations of Texaco Canada, a major lubricants manufacturer that services both the Heavy Equipment and Truck and Coach industry, as well as the Automotive industry as whole, enabled him to put the qualities we feel represent a strong leader, to work as he restructured the company and increased their profitability by a measurable margin. Alan’s vision of the right product for the right customer was exemplified in their ‘reset’ strategy. In other words, by focusing on the right customers, and deleting redundant …show more content…
systems, Alan was able to contribute to Texaco’s success in Canada. Texaco’s education of its’ employees, that is, to educate Texaco’s people to sell specialized products specific to individual customers, emphasized the need to have the right people internally doing the right jobs within Texaco Canada. By empowering employees and becoming a Sheep Herder of sorts himself, Alan Thompson was able to empower his employees and provide execution to the goals that his strategy had outlined. By using the Sheep Herder Technique, that is, by empowering his internal employee’s to make the right, and wrong decisions, Alan’s resources as an overseer were best used in helping the laggards, or stragglers in his herd. He found that by helping the least successful, and empowering the leaders in the herd, that Texaco could once again become a big player in their industry. The culmination of this process was improved lives. In other words, delivering better service to industry customers by increasing service intervals, decreasing time vehicles spent in the shop, and thus increasing profitability for not only the customer, but for Texaco itself. Alan Thompson’s time as Director of Operations of Texaco Canada from 1999 to 2005 exemplified his role as a leader. Alan Thompson exemplified what it means to be a leader, as compared to the several aspects of leadership we have learned in this course. Alan’s first and only position at Texaco Canada was as Director of Operations.
Alan needed to figure out how to increase profitability, the goal he was hired to achieve, by restructuring and educating his employees in any way he saw fit. To exemplify the grandeur of his position, Alan Thompson reported regularly to the President of Texaco Canada. Having a background with Redpath Sugar, a major sugar manufacturer, Alan’s vision became clear soon after starting at Texaco Canada: Deliver the right product, for the right price, all the while understanding exactly what it was the customer desired out of their business transaction. Alan’s examination of the business concluded that Texaco had multiple product lines, some redundant, and the missing link was that customer’s needs were not being matched to the right product in Texaco’s line up. He exclaimed in our interview that in his industry, the 80/20 rule was prevalent. In other words, Alan found 80% of customers concerns when dealing with Texaco were driven by price of product, while only 20% of customers concerns were driven by purchasing the right product that would allow a lower compound cost when down time and cost of service were included. Alan’s strategy had to be, from an operational standpoint, to figure out ways to convince the 80% of customers that they needed to transfer their vision of cost to a more long term model. That is, in order to lower costs over the long term of operating a business, that a higher quality product being used in their vehicles, over time, would increase productivity of their vehicles, decrease the downtime associated with servicing vehicles, and increase profitiablity. By taking this customer first approach, Alan found that Texaco Canada could increase its’ sales of a broader scope of available products, and not just increase sales of their cheapest, lowest quality oils and
lubricants. In Alan’s eyes, education internally, and then externally to customers was the missing key to success that Texaco Canada needed. But how was he going to enact this as Director of Operations? People were the key. Texaco of Canada had the vast employee base necessary to sell product, but it was lacking internal education. Texaco Canada being a subsidiary of Texaco, a USA based public company, Alan found that he needed to cater his employees to the Canadian market place. From talking to his employees, Alan found that most customers had a ‘make it cheap’ attitude, where their total cost on invoices from Texaco Canada influenced whether they brought their products from Texaco or not. In other words, if the invoice had a lower number, that covered lubrication needs for their entire fleet, they signed on the dotted line. Alan had to restructure his employee sales base so that each salesperson knew that by using Texaco’s higher end oils and lubricants for most applications, that longer service intervals could be used, less damage and wear could be done to affected parts, and in total the company using these higher end products would save money through decreased downtime and more efficient vehicles in their fleets. In our interview, Alan really emphasized the key to this vision and strategy was educating his team, his people, to understand and get excited that Texaco’s specialized product line could increase long term profitability for their customers, even though their invoices were at a higher price to the customer. That higher price paid to Texaco mean’t exponentially higher profits to a customers business over the long term. To exemplify this, Texaco Canada’s employees found that by calculating lost revenue associated with the down time it took to change oil and other lubricants at lower intervals, which was needed when using cheaper, lower quality lubricants from Texaco, an average fleet vehicle revenue cost to a customer’s business was around $3000 CAD. This was due to more frequent service intervals, as well as less overall life from moving parts that needed these lubricants. By paying a slightly higher initital cost for a better quality lubricant, the service intervals became extended, which decreased not only wear on parts for the customer, but mitigated that $3000 CAD cost associated with servicing a vehicle in the first place. Once Alan’s people became thoroughly educated and empowered by this information, they could diffuse this information to the customer. It was through Alan Thompson’s education and utilization of his people that Texaco of Canada turned the 80/20 rule upside down. Once Texaco of Canada’s people had clear outlines of why it made sense to use other lubricants than what was simply available at the cheapest price, it became easy to execute Texaco of Canada’s vision and strategy. By going after customers and educating them that it simply was not possible to have cheaply priced products with the best results, employees were able to convince customers to look at different options, and to thoroughly educate them of each level of product’s effects on their fleet, and more importantly, their bottom line profitability. In terms of oversight, Alan used a strategy he liked to call ‘Sheep Herding’ to empower his employees and ensure that his bench was always filled with new leaders ready to move vertically within Texaco of Canada. Alan proclaimed himself as a sheep herder, and used his experience growing up on farms to convey his strategy in execution to us in our interview. He suggested that when herding sheep, a herder does not have to focus so much on the sheep’s leading the herd. They tend to take of themselves. Where a good sheep herders focus needed to be was at the back of the herd, ensuring the laggards and stragglers of the herd were keeping up with the pack. In this strategy, Alan explained that the key was to empower people he saw leadership, and promotional qualities in. He used the term ‘buying in’ when explaining how he would pose questions to his team, and then accept and follow through with answers and solutions to problems that leaders in his team put forward. He suggested that long term success was the key motivator, and that failure within his team was tolerated as a contributor to learning and the teams long term success. He found ways to reflect on his team’s failures, to ensure they did not happen again, and the team moved forward. By buying in and empowering his team, with little intervention from Alan himself, his resources could be spent focused on the laggards, or underachievers within his herd. He told us that most of the time all he had to do was talk with these low achieving employees, and develop individualized strategies for their success. He found that most laggards in his company were confused about the roles that they played, or about what their level of seniority was when it came to decision making. Perhaps they felt that their opinions were not valid because of the job title they held, and thus they contributed to the team effort less than average. By ensuring these types of individuals did have the right to make certain decisions, and by clearly defining their roles within Texaco of Canada, Alan was able to enable his people to execute to their full potential. Although this did not always work, Alan, as a leader himself, had to occasionally show some laggard employees the door and convey to them that perhaps Texaco of Canada was not the right company for them. However, he always attempted to solve problems with under achieving employees first, as losing the investment Texaco of Canada had in each employee mean’t a loss for the company as a whole. He found that this sheep herding strategy worked wonders for Texaco of Canada, and that this was a key strategy in increasing profitibality within the company. His team felt empowered, they felt like they could own their position and flourish in this new environment, and it paid dividends.
Overall, a leader’s style influences employees’ perceptions, levels of trust, and behaviors, and sustains a particular culture, which reinforces a distinct style of leadership (Carter, Ulrich & Goldsmith, 2005). In this case, Jeffers would benefit from becoming a more authentic leader. Authentic leaders align their values, convictions, and mission to be similar to those of their fellow managers and followers (Shamir & Eilam, 2005). In the long run, Jeffers should lead from a belief that Fortuga produces superior merchandise, and his employees and artisans are a critical component to achieving their mission.
Rocket-Blast, LLC, a beverage maker, has seen its profit margins reduced which presents a real problem for the company going forward (Precord & Macdonald, nd). Management has decided that operating costs must be reduced in order to increase profit margins to
This book is important to business students because it shows that even the most seasoned executive runs into unexpected challenges and can find themselves in uncharted territory. Jim Barton’s experiences and lessons can be lessons for anyone. Any employee, whether they are support staff or a top executive, should always maintain an open mind and be ready to learn from a situation or the people around them at any time.
Cost effective leadership was what both companies were seeking in an effort to capitalize off their ability to provide goods and services at a lower costs delivering exceptional services to their clients without their clients getting dismayed about the cost, which contributed to the successes of Ternary. Consensus were built when decisions were made instead of using compulsory tactics in order to surpass their organizational objectives (Leduff, 2015). Robertson B., (2006) believed that Ternary is one of the companies that have grown the fastest in Philadelphia, while he believed that he could not have gained this type of success using the traditional management system (Robertson B. ,
This case study demonstrates a young woman leader, Toby Johnson, who used to serve in the military as a pilot and attended Harvard Business School, joined PepsiCo’s Leadership Development Program (LDP), and was working in the management team at the Williamsport plant. She determined to forge ahead, and led the plant to achieve the Level 3 CI and also won the Doolin Award, which the Williamsport plant had never achieved before. The problem that Johnson encounters currently is that if the plant should continue to forge ahead and achieve the ultimate Level 4 CI, which will cost huge amount of money and efforts with the risk of her sudden leave of plant.
The purpose of this case study is to explore the implications for expanding the products offered by Mountain Man Brewing Company (MMBC) from one product, Mountain Man Lager, to adding a Light version of the beer. This paper will evaluate the following:
The desired outcomes from reorientation of the company’s business were to reduce risk of increasing prices, decrease costs and increase sales. These desired outcomes have ap...
Companies all over the world varies but yet shares a common challenge, that is to solve problem not only effectively and efficiently but also creatively. The P-O-L-C framework which stands for Planning, Organising, Leading and Controlling plays a major role in both the company’s survivability and success. The SWOT analysis looks at both internal and external factors that can affect the Starbucks’s performance. The purpose of this report is to define and analyse how Starbucks respond and should have respond to the change of its external environment on the cofee market,This report will also identify and disscuss how The P-O-L-C framework and can help starbucks to compete and reduce the loss of their failing peformance in the Australian market and how SWOT analysis helps to define some externalities that can be a threat to Starbucks.
“Without change there is no innovation, creativity, or incentive for improvement. Those who initiate change will have a better opportunity to manage the change that is inevitable.” William Pollard’s, a 20th century physicist, words show us the power of being proactive, and igniting change to strengthen a company’s productive climate (Sellers, Boone, Harper, 2011). Acme Airlines flight attendants lacked incentive to improve the quality of their work, as a result of distrustful management and overall frustration within the company. Acme took successful steps to rebuild their FA program into a more relationship oriented work environment. Through an understanding of effective leadership, we will use the
Case Study of The Home Depot Preface This Essentials of Strategic Management assignment has been made by three persons which have been working together and individually to finish the assignment properly and in time. Secondly, we would like to thank the company whose websites we were able to visit and use, to get additional information that we could use for leading the assignment of Home Depot to a successful ending. We can say, that it was a pleasure to work on this assignment and would, in the third place, like to thank each other. The persons who worked on this assignment, for the effort and time that is put in the assignment, that brought us to this finished version.
The New England Wire and Cable (NEWC) present a situation that was quite possibly very common amongst many towns and smaller cities in the United States during the mid-1980s to the early 1990s. As large corporations with new technology swept across the country, small town American and its legacy manufactures and companies struggled to keep pace. This case study references the New England Wire and Cable Company that in some ways was resistant to change. John P. Kotter’s article, Why Transformation Efforts Fail, outlines eight classic errors that are made in the transformation process. Likewise, Kotter’s article also outlines eight steps that could spearhead transformation within an organization. There was clearly a commonly hidden problem within the NEWC the so many times goes unseen. That problem was the leadership of NEWC.
“Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail” is an article written by John P. Kotter in the Harvard Business Review, which outlines eight critical factors to help leaders successfully transform a business. Since leading requires the ability to influence other people to reach a goal, the leadership needs to take steps to cope with a new, more challenging global market environment. Kotter emphasizes the mistakes corporations make when implementing change and why those efforts create failure; therefore, it is essential that leaders learn to apply change effectively in order for it to be beneficial in the long-term (Kotter).
The first issue, described by Ohmae as the Californization of Need, refers to the convergence of customer needs and preferences and the fact that the national identity of many high-quality products has virtually disappeared. Secondly, companies can no longer maintain a leadership position based solely on superior, advanced technology. This results because of the increasing number of critical technologies embedded in the majority of products, therefore, no one can keep the technology out of the hands of competitors around the globe. Thirdly, Ohmae emphasizes the importance of fixed costs. He believes that companies can no longer compete by keeping their variable costs lower than their competitors. The majority of costs incurred by companies these days are fixed costs, therefore, what matters is maximizing marginal contribution from fixed costs and a logical way to do this through forming strategic alliances. The final issue Ohmae identifies is dangers of equity.
Kotter, J. P. (2007). ‘Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail’. Harvard Business Review, January: 96-103.
The challenge was to overcome the overall resistance to change and find a way to get the organization behind ArcTech Flooring, the new specialty product. A culture of customer disengagement and communication problems among divisions along with past norms held by key senior managers made initiating radical innovation difficult. These norms made up the division's mechanistic organizational structure, incentives that are based on overall sector performance, operational competencies, and low risk culture, all of which hindered innovation. This paper explores the leadership challenges involved in managing strategic change in a highly mature Arctic Timber Engineered Woods Division.