Humans are born to have the freedom to decide what they should focus their existence on. Their goals will often created unique experiences around the world while they are working on them. In the essay “On Habit”, Alain de Botton uses his own experience to demonstrate how a mundane world in human's mind can become very interesting. It can be difficult to imagine how to perform this change when humans exist in a society where competitions and stereotypes are present since these competitions and stereotypes often cause humans to neglect the details of the world around them. This negligence of details can cause their experiences to be narrow-minded. To avoid this negligence, humans can change their own attitude, mindset, or consciousness to change …show more content…
their experiences of the world around them. The habituation of humans in a place undermines the consciousness and experience of humans.
In de Botton's essay, the London that de Botton sees after returning from Barbados is unimpressive. The London he’s always known, in his eyes, appeared to be a very uninteresting place. De Botton said “I felt despair to be home. I felt there could be few worse place on earth than the one I had been fated to spend my existence in” (59). De Botton’s experience shows how when humans live in a place for a long time, they will get tired of it and think it is boring. On the other hand, when people travel to a new places, they will open their eyes and focus on details they have never noticed before; they will consider everything they see and encounter as interesting. Human often compares their experiences in places familiar to them with places they have never seen before. That is the reason why de Botton says there are probably no places worse than the one he lives in. It is true that people have never seen parts of the world before, and so many new locations would be interesting, but that doesn’t change how humans fall into a habit of taking their hometowns for granted. De Botton describes how human will start to feel bored by their mundane neighborhoods by saying how human “have discovered everything interesting about a neighborhood” (62). This reason for this behavior is actually caused by human narrowing their own perspective the world. De Botton uses the term “grid of interest” to …show more content…
describe how our consciousness became a habit of focusing “primary goals” (63). The world imposes a grid of interest onto people's consciousness and makes them digress from all the other information around them. This grid of interest will aim people's attention to information that only assists the people in their pursuit of achievement. The world and human consciousness have no connection at all; human cannot change how the world operates, but human can change the experience they have in the world. When de Botton return home from his trip, he said “when we are in a good mood and it is sunny, it is tempting to impute a connection between what happens inside and outside of us, but the appearance of London on my return was a reminder of the indifference of the world to any of the events unfolding in the lives of its inhabitants” (59). De Botton uses the word indifference to describe how the world has absolutely no connection with human consciousness. Humans lie to themselves thinking there is a connection between what they are thinking and the world, but the reality is that no matter what “events” are happening or how hard humans are working during their lifetime, the universe does not care at all about what the human consciousness are. Human cannot change how the world operates with their consciousness and action, but human can change their experience during their lifetime by changing their own mindset and consciousness. Humans often just focus on their daily routine and falls into the habit of imposing a grid of interest on their perspective of the world; they would not consider the world around them as anything other than a tunnel that leads them to the goal they want to achieve. In de Botton’s essay, he shows how he changes his own consciousness can change his experience of the world when he states “[he] forced [himself] to obey a peculiar kind of mental command: to look around [him] as though [he] had never been in this place before. And slowly, [his] travels began to bear fruit” (63). De botton uses the word “travel” to represent human experiencing a place as if they have never been to the place before. When human have this way of thinking, they will be able to digress away from their daily goals that keeps them from focusing all the details around them. As a result, de Botton succeeds in forcing this change in his mindset because he said his travel “bear fruit”. This shows how human can also perform this change to have the similar experience and feeling that de Botton was able to encounter. Even when humans are able to change their own consciousness to view the world differently, only a few people do so because it is difficult to eliminate the bias and stereotypes that exist in this society.
These bias and stereotypes exists because one’s consciousness can impact another. De Botton states that human “temper [their] curiosity to fit in with the expectation of others” (64). The expectation that de Botton describes will be the bias and stereotypes that people creates. These expectation can be as small as simple dislike of something or an opinion of something. People will then start to be impact by other people’s expectation and unconsciously put their consciousness into those expectation. These phenomenon only exists when there are more than one person present in a space. Therefore, De Botton propose this solution of “traveling alone” to prevent from being influenced by other’s consciousness and beliefs. However, since most human don’t live their lives individually, getting away alone and putting the bias behind is a very difficult task. In fact, even if the people are by themselves, it is difficult to change their consciousness. When de Botton tries to change his consciousness to view the world differently, he said “[he] tried to reverse the process of habituation, to disassociate my surroundings from the uses I had found for them until then” (63). Habituation is the form adaptation when humans start to decrease response to the the objects they see after several
repeat encounters. During the process of habituation, human will neglect the details of the objects they encounter except for the objects’ functions because anything other than the functions have no meaning to the goals that humans try to achieve. Conversely, to reverse the process of habituation, humans have to force themselves to increase the level of response to the objects around them and focuses other details that they neglect. This behavior can be analogized as a person biking the same as or opposite direction from the wind. Biking with the wind is always easier than biking against the wind. Similar to the process of habituation, it is much easier to fall into a habit than to getting rid of the habit. It is not because human have no ability to do so, it is just this task requires high amount of concentration and determination for human to achieve. As the society shaped and set our perspective towards the world, changing our attitude, mindset and consciousness will allow human to change their experiences and expectations around the world. Although that might seem to be a troublesome effort and only a few people are willing to do it, trying to look at places that one always encounter in a different will allow he or she to appreciate details that he or she never pay attention to. Having these new experiences can be interesting as human often falls into a habit of seeing everything as ordinary and mundane. These experiences can open people's eyes and allow them to improve their knowledge about the world.
Furthermore, the authors aim to unfold the scientific logic of their analysis of the effects of hidden biases so people will be “better able to achieve the alignment,” between their behavior and intentions (Banaji and Greenwald, 2013) preface
The essay, “The Problem with New Data”, is written by Jon Carroll. In this essay he talks about the human behavior and how humans react differently with others. He explains how humans change their decisions quickly because they are weak. The purpose of this essay is to analyze how humans change their behavior toward certain things. Carroll argues that people belief and government pressure are the main reasons why people do not change their psychology and the way they think. Carroll points out these key points because these are the major issues of our society and what most people are having a hard time dealing with. He argues on the thinking and weaknesses of people and why they do not want to change those things.
Addiction is something that may seem inevitable, but at the end it’s entirely the fault of a person who is addicted. In the article, “the power of habit” by Charles Duhigg, it states how Angie Bachmann became addicted to gambling and how it was entirely her fault because she kept accepting the offers from casinos and many other reasons. Both the casino and Angie knew what they were doing by Angie letting herself get into the situation and the casino encouraging it. She started out as a well-settled housewife. When everybody left the house, she ended up all alone without having much to do. Because of this, one day, as she was passing through the streets, she decided to visit a casino for a change. “She knew gambling could lead to trouble, so
Both authors point out that we as a society can be habitual in their behavior, whether because they do not know the reasons for why they do the things they do, like children, or because they feel helpless in standing up against what is
Implicit Bias refers to the attitudes or stereotypes that affect our understanding, actions, and decisions unconsciously. (Kirwan, 2015) The implicit bias, which includes both favorable and unfavorable being personal, are activated involuntarily and without an individual’s awareness or voluntary control. The implicit interaction subconscious
There are some human phenomena, which seem to be the result of individual actions and personal decisions. Yet, these phenomena are often - on closer inspection – as much a result of social factors as of psychological ones.
Prejudice is the attitude of conveying negative stereotypes to a particular group, usually known as the out-groups. Usually the stereotypes are generalizations based on superficial opinions, so they have an invalid connotation behind it. Stereotypes in some cases evoke prejudice mindsets, leading to discriminate a certain ethnic group, age group, religion, seuxal orienntation, or body size. Stereotypes are usually socially learned from one’s environment and latched onto the mind of a young child. This could possibly later influence their opinion about something they are not fully educated on. One cannot control what they are taught, but one can control what they do with that information. They can either not believe a word of it or take it into
Assume you’re walking down a street and everywhere you turn you encounter pitch black darkness. You reach a point where you only have two choices; either you go left where there is a group of tattooed muscular black men or you go right where you find a group of well dressed white men. What would you do? Your immediate choice would be to stay clear from the group of black men and that you’d be better off going to the right. What just happened here was that you assumed a certain group of human beings is more likely to cause you harm than the other. From a very young age we start to categorize things in to different groups. We see pencils, pens, erasers and we categorize them in a group and call them ‘stationery’. Similarly we tend to categorize human beings in to different groups and associate certain behaviors or traits with these groups. We have this urge to categorize because it makes us ‘cognitively effective’. When we categorize, we no longer need to consider information about each member of the group; we assume that what holds true for some members must also be true for other members of the group. The act of categorizing human beings is known as stereotyping. The word stereotype has Greek roots; ‘stereos’ meaning firm and ‘typos’ meaning impression hence, ‘Firm Impression’. The word itself implies that we associate certain ‘impressions’ with a group and hold these impressions to be true for most if not each member of the group. Although many leading sociologists and psychologists will have us believe that stereotypes are firmly grounded in reality, the truth is stereotypes exist only because we allow them to; we cause their existence and ultimately perpetuate them because in reality stereotypes are nothing but mere logical fal...
For thousands of years, humans have bonded together to become more efficient at building, learning, and creating societies. But interaction with others isn’t beneficial to large groups, but also for the individual. Our personal opinions and beliefs develop in part due to the influence of the people who surround us, which tempers extreme and unique views and conforms them more to society. This means that when someone lives with little human contact, they are more likely to have irregular and unusual opinions.
By living with a familiar perspective, we become ignorant to our familiar surroundings. What happens when the familiar becomes the only thing that we experience? Life becomes insignificant. In “On Habit”, Xavier de Maistre comes up with what he calls a “travelers’ mindset”, in order to look at things in a new and different perspective. In “Nocturnal Expedition around my Bedroom”, de Maistre describes as he looks up at the sky through the window: “Its beauty made him feel frustrated that such ordinary scenes were not more generally appreciated,” (de Botton 243). The travelers’ mindset involves moving away from viewing things in a familiar perspective in order to find new significance in a well-known setting. Alain de Botton, the author of “On Habit,” tries to apply the travelers’ perspective to his own life. He does this by trying to notice the little things around his city that he had simply ignored before due to it being too recognizable. It is remarkable how descriptive he is in talking about the architecture of the cities when taking this new mindset: “The power of my primary goal had drained me of the will to reflect on the layout of the park or the unusual mixture of Georgian, Victorian, and Edwardian architecture along a single block,” (de Botton 246). By disregarding the fact that he had travelled down that path
“Humans are not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one” (“Class 20”). This was asserted by the much acclaimed, significant, and influential social psychologist Leon Festinger as referencing to his theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Social psychology is “a branch of psychology particularly concerned with understanding social behaviors such as” incentive and compliance (Sheehy). Festinger’s contributions to the social and cognitive branches of psychology as well psychology overall prove themselves worthy to today. This theory specifically challenged many common notions that were seemingly already accepted by behaviorists everywhere during his time (Tavris and Aronson). Its reality awakens its verifications. Consecutively, its “enormous motivational power” affects many on a daily basis (Tavris and Aronson). In the final analysis, the theory of Cognitive Dissonance by Leon Festinger is fundamental to behaviorism while directly changing the way human beings across the planet think and do.
Trueman, David. "Depersonalization In Nonclinical Population." Journal Of Psychology 116.1 (1984): 107. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 12 Feb. 2014.
According to Devine (1989), automatic processing involves the unconscious retrieval of obtained associations that develop through memory repetition; this process links with stimulus cues in the environment. The intense nature of automaticity is that an individual cannot escape or try to ignore the process (Devine, 1989). People build and enforce stereotypes through this automatic process and have no conscious control of memory retrievals. Human bodies take a lot of effort to function, but automatic processing requires little effort. People, therefore, mostly rely on automatic thinking, rather than controlled. This is why some researchers argue that automatic processing is why stereotyping is inevitable; because automaticity is easier, it does not mean controlled thinking cannot disband stereotypes (Devine, 1989). Controlled thinking is intentional and requires active participation of an individual. This proce...
A stereotype is defined as “an often unfair and untrue belief that many people have about [an entire group of] people or things with a particular characteristic” (stereotype, n.d.). While not all stereotypes are necessarily negative, the word “stereotype” itself has a negative connotation that it has earned over the course of human history. Stereotyping has been a mental phenomenon that has intrigued psychologists and others alike for many years. There have been questions to whether or not it is an automatic response or a controlled cognitive belief. More specifically, this study addresses the question if a person’s perception of another person or subject influences the automaticity of stereotyping. This is an important subject because it approaches the issue of whether we as humans can control our immediate, initial thoughts, positive or negative, about a person or thing; which ultimately determines our attitude toward the individual or thing, which effects our behavior.
Steve Pinker’s The Blank Slate evaluates what many consider to be common knowledge of human nature and proves it wrong. Two arguments of the framework of reality and the influence of behavioral genetics yield the most convincing argument that I found changed how I view myself and how my world view was developed.