Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of technology to the environment
Technology and its effect on the environment paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of technology to the environment
Humans are living in an age of technological prosperity. Our species has invented automobiles, artificial intelligence, advanced medicines, and supercomputers. You are probably reading this message through an operating system. The truth is, we have done so much for the advancement of humanity that we tend to forget we are not the only species who live on this planet. We spoil ourselves rotten with inventions our globe has given us, and we torture and steal from animals only because we are able to. One might argue that we only do this to maintain our species and that this drive to survive is only learned from our human ancestors. Contrary to that belief, our human ancestors have been long extinct and there is no longer a need to take from animals …show more content…
We mustn’t continue the harvesting and torturing of animals any longer. The truth is, humans are capable of living without animal fur garments. We have done so much for the advancement of our society that we only take for granted those billions of lives we kill each year. It’s a reality that many do not want to face, there is just no point of harvesting animal fur anymore. We are in an age of smartphones and practical quantum computers, yet we still reserve and maintain the medieval fur industry. We have a vast amount of cruelty-free synthetic alternatives that are more advanced than traditional animal fur, yet we still prefer to wear the carcasses of animals. We have a tendency to believe that humans are the superior species and that any other species shall be deemed of a lower class. That belief however is only your ego talking. Nothing in this world is created with a certain amount of value. You have no more greater value than the noble carpenter ant. Therefore, why must you feel deserving of wearing the remains of 100-200 chinchillas. There is no excuse. The only reason you purchase and wear fur coat in this age is solely for the purpose of gloating you own a fur coat. Animals are not fashion trends! And it is utterly idiotic to believe such a sickening thing. You are aware of the reality that you are wearing the remains of tortured and beaten creatures, yet you still own a sense of entitlement. You have what you have and by God, there is no valid excuse for inflicting suffering on animals just for your own meaningless desires. This way of thinking is ancient and imprudent, and is not how a society should
Every natural instinct of survival, for both animals and humans, is evil. According to the paradigm of our society, it is immoral to be selfish, to steal, to feel empathy only for your kin and apathy for everyone else, and to kill for personal gain. On the contrary, according to the natural instincts followed by all of the animal kingdom, you are to insure your own and your pack’s own survival, no matter the cost, disregarding all others; to steal, to feel apathy for other groups, and to kill for power and personal gain are all common practices that animals do in nature without the bat of an eye. These instincts do not only apply to lesser animals, but humans share them as well, for we are animals like all the others. There are no morals
My Year of Meats (Ozeki) tells the story of two women in two very different parts of the world, and their tumultuous, life-changing journey with meat over the course of a year. Both characters come face to face with situations that test their beliefs and morals, as well as their resolve. There are many themes and lessons that come out of the two women’s’ journey regarding the media, meat products and capitalism, but one of the majors themes that is present in all aspects of the story is the idea of how ideals are carried through society. At one point or another, both women are faced with a choice to either continue on the path their life is currently on, or go against society and change their course. Ruth Ozeki supports the idea in her book that in order to be truly happy and have a less stereotypical society, each individual member of society must be willing to look at their own lives and change it themselves; otherwise, true change will never happen, and society will never be able to move past its limiting views.
Many people believe that animal cruelty is an acceptable consequence if done for scientific purposes or to sustain human economy. Just imagine yourself being a monkey, for a shampoo testing organization, being forced to take chemicals down your throat to see its effect, and if you didn’t die during this process, you would’ve been killed and dissected anyway to see what organs have been affected. All this needs to be done for what purpose? To make sure that someone could have the really needed necessity of having another great, lovely new shampoo that smells exactly like all the others in the market, just wonderful.
I agree with Ray Bradbury, humanity is doomed. Technology has created so many problems, so rapidly, that humans cannot respond to the changes. Technology has become a tool that makes our lives easier, but the negative effects are far too overpowering, making it almost impossible to stop it before it is too late. Examples from “The Veldt,” and “There Will Come Soft Rains,” show the potential dangers that technology could bring. It may seem unbelievable, but just as George Hadley said, “This is a little too real, but I don’t see anything wrong,” (Bradbury 1). Humans cannot see the problem, only past it. Global warming, antibiotic overuse, overpopulation, and modern warfare, are just a few of the threats technology bestows upon us.
Throughout the early 1900’s, the government offered very little protection when it came to the regulation of certain products, especially meats. During Jurgis’s employment at the meat packing industry, he witnessed many horrific things and heard many stories (from his family and coworkers) about how meat was processed and sold. On his first day of his first job, which consisted of sweeping the leftovers of slaughtered animals through the trap door, he noticed that the inspector, who was supposed to check the meat and either pass or reject it, let dozens of pigs go by unchecked for tuberculosis because he was conversing with another person nearby (Sinclair 31). Jurgis also found out from Dede Antanas, his father, that all of the beef that had
Human beings have advanced to a point where survival from the outside world is almost incredibly easy. They have created cures and inventions that could enhance their everyday lifestyles. They are also the only species to modify the planet in any way they can imagine. Does that make human beings the dominant species? Because most people presume they have the right to control other animals, they presume they’re the superior species. People’s lifestyles suggest that they are doing fine. However, people often seem to forget that they are animals too. People are not superior to animals, they are just different.
For many centuries clothing was used namely as a form of symbolising one’s ascribed class and social honour. A good example of this was evident in Feudal European times when sumptuary laws were created in order to regulate and specify the clothing that could be worn by certain classes. In 1463 Edward IV went so far as to ‘[declare] that purple silk was to be the prerogative of the aristocracy’ (Finkelstein 1991, pg. 137). As purple dye and silk were both very expensive and sought after this declaration demonstrated quite simply that those who were in possession of such materials should command respect and were of high social standing. Eventually these laws were abolished as, instead of ‘confining people to their designated rank, the laws provoked an intense interest in fashion and a desire to transgress the codes, both in the process of prestigious emulation and as an act of rebellion’ (Craik, 1994, pg. 205). This abolition allowed groups and individuals to establish their own chosen style or ‘marker’ in order to indicate their place within society. By allowing such freedom, ascribed social status gave way to that which was achieved. This not only meant that many more people were able to engage in the ever-expanding culture of ‘Haute couture’ but also that honour was no longer perceived as a birth right but rather as something that could to be obtained. Such a shift in symbolism provided a way for those of not so noble a birth to portray themselves as the latter through a variety of means such as renting or stealing clothes and buying counterfeit copies (a common occurrence in today’s society also).
Imagine being beaten to near death and being painfully skinned alive. This scenario seems as if it would only happen in a horror film, but in reality it occurs on a daily basis. Looking at a fur coat through a store window or in a glossy magazine one may not realize that animals were beaten, electrocuted, crammed in filthy wire cages, or even hanged just to produce a simple fur coat. Every year millions of animals are treated wrongly and even killed for the fur on their backs. Society may think twice about wearing the corpse of an animal when one knows what really happens in the name of fashion. An immeasurable amount of suffering went into every fur trimmed jacket, leather belt, or wool sweater hanging in ones closet. To eradicate the unnecessary suffering of animals for fashion, wearing fur must be made illegal.
. One could say that the human race is more advanced than animals because of the technology that it has. Technology is a great thing, but it can also be used for controlling people. In the book 1984, George Orwell gives one a great view of the possible horrors that could come out of technology when it's used for the purpose of control.
The issue of meat consumption has been a controversial topic on whether to allow the practice or discontinue it, non-meat eaters argue it’s unethical because it is abusive to animals. On the other hand, meat consumers argue that eating meat is ethical as long as meat eaters are conscious of how their meat is collected and the treatment of livestock is fair. The consumption of meat is an act that an individual decides whether to partake in or not. Therefore, the option of eating meat should not be completely taken away, but it should be limited. Eating meat ties in with vegetarian and vegan diets, in the sense that both have to follow guidelines to create an ethical approach to eating any grown foods. The consumption of food is ethical when
It is shown that lawmakers do not view animal abuse as seriously as they possibly should, perhaps because animal cruelty is so common and is sometimes even viewed as entertainment. There are common cases of animal abuse in everyday life, such as: hunting, poaching, factory farming, rodeos, and the industries that offer authentic fur, leather, feathers, and wool. The industries that use authentic animal hide have no excuse for not finding a suitable substitute. Honestly, there is no reason why the skin of an animal is to be used in clothing other than the fact that it is considered “fasion.” There are also cases of animal abuse that are celebrated as a cherished tradition.
It is the deepest essence and biology basis for any species to ensure survival, so called self-preservation, which also constitute human nature. Self-preservation is instinctive to keep ourselves both physically and psychologically alive. With this built into the psyche of human, we demand all elements from the external environment that raise our chances to survive. We need nutrient from food, cloth, shelter, sexual love and sense of security. And we would escape from elements reducing our chances to survive, like offence by predators, starving, dehydrating, and any circumstance that cause danger to our life. Reproduction is another human nature which we have to survive for enough periods to pass genes to offspring. However, these two parts of human nature are neither good nor evil.
In the 21st century, we live in the era of technology-driven world. Humans never stopped the development of technology, because we always have a natural tendency to pursue a higher level of human being. Technology is the best evidence of human intelligence, which has shown that we are different from other animals. We have lived with technology since we were born. Although it has intervened heavily in our daily lives that we can’t no longer live without, nobody can deny the achievements it has brought to us.
Technology has advanced to the point where it touches our lives in nearly every conceivable way-we no longer have to lift a finger to perform the most trivial tasks. The wealth of information and science we have learned in the last few centuries have made our lives easier but not always better, especially when concerning civilization as a whole. Ibsen, Freud, and Vonnegut argue that human values have not kept pace with knowledge's unceasing expansion, which has become an anathema for the individual person and deleterious to society's delectation, albeit without people's entire comprehension.
Human beings, ever since its creation has never been alone on the earth. As we all know we share this planet with lots of different species of living creatures, such as animals, and plants. But even though we name ourselves the superior species due to our ability to think, make decisions and choose how we want to live our lives, we start to grow. Our growth ranges among many different aspects, such as infrastructure and lifestyle. This led to us somehow neglecting the fact that we are not alone in this planet. We start pushing other species out of the way, and we sometimes don’t realize that the impact felt by those other species has terrible and sometimes deadly consequences, and also we sometimes fail to understand that it can also cause harm to us.