Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship between race, age and crime
Sociology age and crime
Link between age and crime sociology essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relationship between race, age and crime
Mid-term
The age crime curve attempts to explain that the age in which crimes are most prevalent. According to the curve the incidence of crime increases with age until individuals reach about 16 to 20 years old. Understanding the age crime curve is important because it contributes to understand or at least analyze if the relationship between age and crime is due to prevalence. In other words, if the general shape of the curve according to age appears because of involvement in offending varies by age group. Is there a larger proportion of the adolescent population responsible for offending more, while the population older age groups offending less.
In the Wolfgang et al Philadelphia Birth Cohort study, Marvin Wolfgang and his colleagues completed
…show more content…
Prevalence is the difference between participation of crime between those who do not commit a crime. Frequency refers to the rate which a crime is committed, and its implications related to crime policy. Onset refers to the beginning of a criminal career. Persistence refers to a continuing criminal activity and desistance refers to stopping a criminal activity. Finally, a career length refers to the amount of time between onset and desistance. Understanding which offenders are more likely to have a longer criminal career can help the system but the problem comes when all these components are mixed together. This point brings me to my final point for this paper: how does all this relate or contribute to the prediction problem. Well first point I want to emphasize is the fact that when one looks at the relationship between age and crime at the individual level one can see a great deal of variation. When it comes to analyzing the age-crime curve there is this lack of comprehension about the covariance across time, place, individual characteristics, and offense type. By looking at the curve one sees the numbers a whole rather than at the individual level. When one looks at the relationship between age and crime at the individual level, however, one can see a great deal of variation. Therefore, the prediction of crime is not realistic. What seems like an easy question has no one simple answer at all. A lot of research has been done with regards to crime rates, but this indeed is a complex
The writer further contends Young’s noting the mathematical models was intentional, and designed to effectively illustrate his point of their ineffectiveness because they are difficult to absorb. Despite such difficulty, the writer contends Young did immediately create some useful insights. Foremost was the ideal of what Young metaphorically termed, the “datasauer also known as Empiricus Abstractus” (Young, 2011). What the writer noted was Young’s critique of modern criminology’s ineffective and improper overuse of empiricism to predict criminal behavior is a flawed concept due to variation fluctuations and data manipulation. The writer noted that Young (2011) used as evidence to demonstrate deficiencies the very thing he argues against in noting the level of explanatory power in multivariate models over-estimates prediction levels (p.
Laub and Sampson (2003) discuss the prominent theories of crime over the life course with an emphasis on the work of Terrie Moffitt. Moffitt (1993) attempted to explain life course persistence and some discontinuity. According to Moffitt (1993), there are two distinct categories of offenders concealed by early offending: adolescent-limited offenders and life-course persistent offenders. In this taxonomy, adolescent-limited offenders are those who offend temporarily and discontinue use while life-course persistent offenders are those who offend continuously, with an earlier beginning in delinquency (Moffitt 1993). Adolescent limited offenders only participate in antisocial behavior during adolescence while life-course persistent offenders participate in anti-social behavior throughout the life course beginning in early childhood and into adulthood (Moffitt 1993). Moffitt’s theory (1993) all...
The sample size and exclusion of individuals, such as under 16’s or those in group residence, creates bias and an untrue reflection on population as crimes they experience are not taken into consideration (HO, 2013).
...azerolle &ump; Piquero, 1998; Piquero &ump; Sealock, 2000) as well as non-offending populations, including youths (Agnew and White, 1992; Aseltine et al., 2000; Brezina, 1996; Paternoster and Mazerolle, 1994), college students and adults (Mazerolle and Piquero, 1998; Broidy, 2001). The theory has also been examined across gender (Ganem, 2010; Broidy and Agnew, 1997; Eitle, 2002; Hoffman and Su, 1997; Mazerolle, 1998; Hay, 2003; Piquero and Sealock, 2004) and race (Jang and Johnson, 2003), and for property crimes, and other deviant behaviors.
As Laub and Sampson (2003) analyze crime over the life course, they highlight Terrie Moffitt’s theory and discuss the limitations of her developmental explanation. In Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, she acknowledges two categories of offenders...
Many factors may have led to the decrease in crime, but there are five very plausible explanatory factors as causal to the crime decline. The first is the demographic change, specifically referring to the changing composition of the population (Rosenfeld, 2011). Crime is a young mans game, and the aging of the baby boom generation is an important factor behind the drop, because older populations generally commit fewer crimes (Rosenfeld, 2011).
adolescent has been found to increase the risk for violent and aggressive behavior and criminality
Several studies conducted to determine impacts of transfers of cases from juvenile courts to adult criminal courts for trial and potential sentencing indicate higher recidivism rates among the offenders. This is because of the notion the youth possess on the strictness on the adult courts. They believe trials on these courts end up in harsh punishment for offenders. In a way, adult punishments scare youth away from committing major crimes. However, studies show that short term punishments imposed on young offenders in adult courts propagates the offenders to commit even more crimes that are serious after their sentence terminates. This results from interactions with other crimes bearer behind bars who are convicted for far much worse crimes than they are. In addition the young offenders continued to commit crimes at a higher rate and more often than earlier on (Shari, page 1).
Power-control theory could also explain the differences in total crime rates between adults and youths. This theory identifies family roles as a major factor in determining delinquency. As people age, they begin to take on greater responsibilities within the family. An example is a youth eventually aging and becoming a parent to a child. That individual, no matter the gender, now has greater responsibilities such as providing for and raising the child. With more responsibility, comes less opportunity for delinquency, explaining the lower crime rates amongst adults compared to
In England, conforming to the Civitas’s Crime report Youth Crime in England and Wales (2010) the youngest age that someone can be prosecuted is as young as ten years old. It is also mentioned that trailing, patrolling and applying penalties on young offenders costs almost four billion pounds annually. The numbers of first time offences committed by a young person has decrease over the years; according to the Youth Justice Statistics (2014) youth crime is down by 63% since 2002. In regards to the offences themselves, nearly every offence category has decreased in reoccurrence with exception to drug offences declares Civitas’s Youth Crime in England and Wales (2010). The same report states that theft and handling remains the highest volume category taking up 21% of all youth crime. It is shortly followed by violence against a person, 19.5%, and criminal damage, 11.9%. It can be concluded from both aforementioned reports that crime in the UK is decreasing. Contrariwise to this, youth reoffending rates are soaring concludes Civitas’s Youth Crime in England and Wales (2010).
In Life Course theory, we see the idea that throughout a person’s life they will fluctuate in how actively they participate in criminal activity as they grow older. It is believed that those who will participate in delinquent activities at a younger age, will grow and continue this behavior throughout their whole life. These persons are referred to as “life course persistent offenders” as they will struggle with criminal activities throughout their livelihood. The other type of offender in this theory is the “adolescent limited offender”. This type of offender will mimic the criminal behavior of life course persistent offenders at an earlier age, generally teens to early adulthood, but then go back to more socially acceptable behaviors.
Many studies have confirmed a possible relationship between both variables, where as an offender ages, they become less likely to commit further criminal activity. In the last few decades, however, the focus on age and crime has shifted and broadened to incorporate older people as an offender and perpetrator of serious crime rather than just a victim. The idea of a stereotypical criminal can be regarded as one of the main reasons there is a lack of policy and program adaptation directed towards older offenders. Offending is often regarded as a youth phenomenon while fear of crime belonged to the realm of older individuals.
This theory relates crime rates to the overall characteristics of the neighborhood in which the crime is taking place. A persons location is a huge factor in the possibility that he or she will partake in illegal activities. Strong social relationships can prevent crime and delinquency. According to NCJRS (2003), “When most community or neighborhood members are acquainted and on good terms with one another, a substantial portion of the adult population has the potential to influence each child.” If there are more people involved in the community, then more will become like informal surveillance and care about the behavior of juveniles in that area because they are willing to intervene.
Predicting and preventing crime is surely better than its counterpart: reacting and stopping crime after the fact. One surefire way to get an idea of who will commit the crimes is to cross reference traits and demographics of already imprisoned criminals, hoping for clear cut trends that they could use to reasonably forecast future criminals. Over time, with enough evidence and data, it would be possible to predict and prevent crimes by looking at the factors that produce criminal thought processes and intervene appropriately. It is important to note that biology is not destiny, no trend or pattern is perfect enough to allow for 100% certainty. Yet knowledge is power and by reasonably assuming that a specific trait leads to criminal behavior,
I now know that criminology prefer to highlight the correlations between crimes’ social climates and criminals’ psychological states of mind. While some argues that criminal behavior is a result of individuals’ association with criminal peers, other claims that crime is a reflection of an individual’s genetic disadvantages. I have come to learn that there are no universally agreed formulas on decoding crimes and criminal behaviors. What we have, however, is a manual full of academic opinions and subjective views that have emerged alongside of the development of criminology. At the same time, the volume of conflicting perspectives that I have stumble upon in studying criminology reminded me again that the success of our current assessment models has yet to be determined. Thus, the study of criminology is an appropriate practice that will further prepare me to conduct meaningful research on legal studies and to provide accurate and in-depth findings in the near