Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Political effects of WW 1
Political effects of WW1 on the world
World politics after ww2
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Political effects of WW 1
Sometimes the aftermath of a war can be just as destructive as the war itself. This was especially true after the First World War. When the war was over, governments were in shambles, unable to govern their own subjects. They could not give their people what they needed, and in the political turmoil aspiring leaders used this to their advantage and took power. After World War One, the totalitarian leaders of Adolf Hitler in Germany, Benito Mussolini in Italy, and Joseph Stalin in Russia were able to take power through the political chaos that followed the war, each government’s inability to provide for their people, and the people’s hunger for change.
First, following the War to End all wars, totalitarian leaders were able to rise to the top
…show more content…
Throughout postwar Germany, inflation was extremely high, and the Government was not able to make decisions. There were too many parties for the democracy to run smoothly. The Weimar government was not serving the needs of the people as it needed to, and the people wanted a new government. Inflation was a similar scene in postwar Italy as well. Italy’s unit of currency became worth about a sixth as much as it was before the war. Additionally, food shortages became common as farmers went on strike. The TCI textbook states, “Adding to the economic crisis, jobless workers had to compete with returning soldiers for whatever work was available.” The Italian government was not being an effective government either, and was not serving the needs of the people. In Leninist Russia, the people weren’t getting their needs met either. In the video titled Stalin Comes To Power, it is stated, “What we need to remember here is that the people were suffering. The people were in crisis and the Russian government was not able to meet those needs.” The Russian people were therefore more welcoming to Lenin, who promised reform. Totalitarian leaders were able to take power in part because the governments that they replaced were unable to meet the people’s needs, and people were much more open to the idea of a new
World War II, known as the largest armed conflict in history, began in Europe in the 1930s and led to effect many people. The war resulted in not only the involvement of more countries than any other war but also introduced powerful, new, nuclear weapons that also contributed to the most deaths. As Hitler rose to power in 1933 the Holocaust began, his quest for the ‘perfect’ race resulted in the use of concentration camps, which would help to create the largest genocide of people in history.
It was during the 1920’s to the 1940’s that totalitarian control over the state escalated into full dictatorships, with the wills of the people being manipulated into a set of beliefs that would promote the fascist state and “doctrines”.
In the late 1930s complaisant European nations were lulled into the jaws of the very dangerous “victim/slave mentality.” Weak democracies tried placating and accommodating the tyrannical proponents of the Communist, Socialist and Fascist ideologies and Europe soon found itself in jeopardy with maniacs like Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini threatening the existence of taken-for-granted freedom and human rights. Thanks to the intervention of the United States Hitler and Mussolini were defeated (despite incredible adversity) and Europe was salvaged from the scourge of Fascism. But Nazi Fascism did not go away meekly. Its defeat required intensive struggle, sacrifice and perseverance with over 50 million military and civilian deaths occurring during the widespread devastation.
One of the key criteria of a totalitarian government is that there is complete control over the economy. However, within Nazi Germany there was never all-encompassing state ownership over the economy. In fact, Hitler never placed importance on the ‘socialist’ aspect of NSDAP ideology. He did not believe in state ownership or redistribution of wealth, and he allowed capitalism and big business thrive in the Third Reich, as they were necessary for the revitalisation of Germany’s economy. Moreover, the Nazi State was not the extremely rigid political structure it appeared to be. While, Hitler himself was very secure in his position as Fuhrer, below him the political structure was quite chaotic. In terms of government agencies, there was not much direction from the top, as they were instructed to interpret the will of the Fuhrer and then enact it. Moreover, there was a large amount of overlap and inefficiency, while solidifying Hitler’s position, generally weakened the ability to rule over people. Finally, below Hitler, there was a lot of infighting in attempt to gain greater power and favor from Hitler. Similar to the inefficiencies created by overlap, this created inefficiency and weakened the ability to have totalitarian
The post-WWII years were a very prosperous time for America, due to numerous factors. However, the two major factors that help produce this economic growth are birthrates/consumer spending increases, and Government spending.
World War II was an unprecedented global war which occurred on the 1st of September , 1939 and drew to a close on 2nd of September 1945. The invasion of Poland by the Germans provoked the outbreak of World War II which involved a large majority of countries including all of the great powers which then led to the formation of the two opposing alliances the Axis and the Allies. Australia’s involvement in the war was due to the following reasons which was their need to support their mother country which is Britain , Economic and financial issues and Foreign policy issues.
Hitler and Mussolini looked upon the new form of government, which was Totalitarianism. This form of government means there is only one leader to make decisions and thus they killed or jailed all opponents. Mussolini and Hitler used this form of government after World War One to make their countries into world powers.
World War I and World War II were wars fought away from home, but still made a large impact on the people at home. Both wars required a lot of men fighting against the enemy forces, and because of that a lot of supplies were needed in order to sustain the soldiers. This meant that many people at home were heavily impacted by the need of human and natural resources. Specifically how the minorities were affected and what role they played in both the world wars. Many of the minorities faced racial prejudices during this time period, but this did not some of them from wanting to fight for their country.
to assume the role of dictator. This was a phenomenon which was to become a
“Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.” Plato wrote this in 360 B.C.E. in his book titled The Republic, despite it being centuries old, it still speaks the truth. This can be seen in the years before World War 2, when the world saw three major dictators rise to power. Dictators such as Adolf Hitler of Germany, Hideki Tojo of Japan, Benito Mussolini of Italy and Joseph Stalin of Russia were the main dictators who came to power during this time period. The outbreak of these dictators were one of the many direct causes of WWII, and while Stalin was on the side of the Allies, he was still a brutal dictator of his country. But why do these dictators rise to power and what is to say they won’t rise again? An in depth look at the situations that Germany, Italy and Japan were forced to endure along with a look at trends in history can answer these questions.
While the second world war was coming to a close, Joseph Stalin, of the Soviet union was one of the major powers. He had gained enough power to persuade and influence many people and nations. This persuasion allowed him to create a communist/totalitarian state where he brutally punished his own people. Towards the end of the Second World War he had enough power and persuasive capability to claim 15 Eastern European nations under the empire of the Soviet Union. He promised in the Yalta Conference he would allow free elections, but he never fell through on his promise. Instead he implanted communist governments that were extreme police States. After Stalin’s death in 1953, two more extreme communist leaders took his place. The leaders following them, however, would leave them in the right direction.
How would you feel if you were treated unfair? I would feel very sad because no one should be treated unfair. So i’m reading books called WarTime Mistakes and Go For Broke . I’m going to tell you how unfair they were treated and how it ended.
World War II had a large effect on America, on how we were regarded in the world, on how our culture would grow and develop, and on how our citizens would develop and settle the land on their return. It brought people together for a while that were later torn apart, and changed the way Americans looked at higher education. Perhaps most importantly, it brought America to the world and served it up to them as something that could grow and become part of their culture, call it the Coca-Colonization of the world (Marling).
Historians argue that in Nazism, ‘the value of the totalitarian concept seems extremely limited’ as they compare the regime to other totalitarian states. They state that Nazism could not have been totalitarianism because it wasn’t as organized and monolithically structured as Stalin’s Russia. The Nazism ideology was a mere scheme of self-fulfilment and lacked the methodical theory of Marxism. Under no circumstance was there a level of state possession and influence over the economy in comparison to that which developed in Stalin’s Russia. In spite of the Nazi Party’s dominance over state affairs, authority was divided between themselves and a quantity of major power groups including the industrialists and the armed forces, while Stalin’s Communist Party possessed unconditional power over all Russian state affairs. A German historian stated that Hitler ‘...brought about a state of affairs in which the various autonomous authorities ranged alongside and against one another...’ Hitler relied on a level of popularity from the nation acquired through promoting himself through propaganda to maintain his leadership. There are no implications that Stalin sought popular appeal to maintain his power. Generally, historians have debated the weak dictatorship of Hitler but never have they contemplated ...
The movie I chose was World War Z I have always love work of Max Brooks. I wanted to see if I could find any Sociological problems with in this movie. Also I love movies that have Zombies in them.