African Lion Safari Case
After plaintiffs Jenifer Cowles and David Balac were attacked by a tiger at the African Lion Safari on April 19th, 1996 the Lion Safari received complete negligence of the attack and also awarded 2.8 million dollars to the plaintiffs for the final outcome. One could disagree with the final outcome of The Lion Safari receiving 100% of the blame. One could argue that he plaintiffs should receive 50% negligence and The African Lion Safari should receive the other 50% fault for the incident that occurred on April 19th. The day of the attack at the African Lion Safari Cowles and Balac drove through the tiger exhibit, which thousands of people drive throughout the summers time after time and have no problems have occurred
Case, Adeels Palace v Moubarak (2009) 239 CLR 420 entails a defendant, Adeels Palace Pty Ltd and two plaintiffs, Anthony Moubarak and Antoin Fayez Bou Najem. On New Year’s Eve 2002, a function, hosted by Adeels was open to members of the public, with a charged admission fee. A dispute broke out in the restaurant. One man left the premises and later returned with a firearm. He seriously injured both respondents. One was shot in the leg and other in the stomach. The plaintiffs separately brought proceedings against the defendant in the District Court of New South Wales (NSW), claiming damages for negligence. The trial judge issued Bou Najem $170,000 and Moubarak $1,026,682.98. It was held that the duty of care was breached by the defendant as they ‘negligently’ failed to employ security for their function. The breach of duty and resulted in the plaintiff’s serious injuries.
They reasoned that since Barnett didn’t either argue against the dismissal of negligence claim at the time of its dismissal or include the claim in subsequent revisions, she had no support for her claim that the court had erred in dismissing her claim of negligence. The court also ruled that the language of section 3-108(b) of the Tort Immunity Act meant that complete, unconditional immunity was to be offered if supervision was present. As a result of this interpretation, the issue of if the lifeguards had committed willful and wanton misconduct was rendered irrelevant. Since the issues of material fact raised by the appellant weren’t actually issues of material fact, the Supreme Court affirmed the District and Appellate Court’s motion and subsequent affirmation of summary
It was found in the respondents submissions that a duty of care was necessary. The issue of negligence he believed was unsustainable as the risks were minimal and it was not unusual to take one’s eyes off the road. Causation was not satisfied as the judge concluded that the respondent would not have had enough time in any circumstance to avoid a collision with the cow.
Three dimensional art is defined as media which “occupies space, defined through the dimensions of height, width and depth” (SAYLOR). These art works can be geometric or organic in nature (NORTON). Three dimensional art forms include sculptures, crafts and architecture. Three dimensional art form is fascinating to me because of the amount of realism and beauty it embodies, as well as for its functional and aesthetic value. For this assignment, I chose two beautiful pieces that illustrated the characteristic of three dimensional art and the processes it took to produce them. The first art work I want to analyze is a sculpture done by an Iraqi artist from Kalhu (modern day Nimrud) entitled, “Assurnasirpal II Killing Lions” (Sayre, 420).
The appellant, Jesse Mamo, was a passenger in a vehicle driven by the respondent, Steven Surace. Whilst the respondent looked down to adjust the radio, a cow wandered on to the road, colliding with the vehicle . The appellant alleged that the respondent failed to use high beam or maintain a proper lookout. The respondent denied liability and pleaded contributory negligence. At trial, the Judge held that breach of duty of care had not transpired, as it was an unforeseeable risk causing an unavoidable accident, as the cow appeared too close to react. The Judge argued that the respondent acted appropriately toward ‘foreseeable risks”, which the cow was not part of.
The second issue is whether or not the defendant has an obligation to reimburse for an injury. The outcome of this second issue depends whether or not it is rational for the defendant to have to pa...
In today's time period we live in today more and more buildings are being developed and destroying the beautiful scenery that nature gives to us as a gift. In the poem “Where mountain lion lay down with deer “ by Leslie Marmon Silko is about a young girl describing the beautiful moments of her childhood. But she writes that in today's time period she does not see these beautiful scenery from nature because of all the new developments being constructed. Leslie Marmon’s “Where mountain lion lay down with deer” is a good work of literature because it uses imagery effectively, Relates to modern day conflicts and it makes the reader think. First Marmon’s “Where mountain lion lay down with deer” is a good story because it uses imagery effectively throughout the story , For example in the poem the narrator begins “I climb the black rock mountain”(line 1) the narrator makes the reader mentally visualize what's she saying making the poem more effective.
Patrick Lewis, the protagonist in the story, In The Skin Of A Lion, goes through an internal change in his beliefs and in his personality; these changes can be noticed throughout the novel. Patrick goes through relationships throughout his life that end up manipulating his view of other’s actions. These key personality changes can be found in the relationships that Patrick had with Clara Dickens, as well as his relationship with Alice Gull. Michael Ondaatje, the author, clearly shows the mental change that Mr. Lewis endured, by showing his compassion and caring with Ms. Dickens; then his attitude changed once Alice influenced him. Nearing the end of the story the change becomes obvious, with his need for revenge, and the interpretation of his attitude with his final actions in the novel.
Growing up is something that comes and it’s unavoidable. No matter how much one tries to hold on to it it’s something that’s inevitable in one way or another we all grow up and mature. We start to see the world differently or realize things aren’t what we think they are. This is the case with Alberto Alvaro Rios’s “The Secret Lion.” The whole story revolves around the twelve year old narrator whose name is unknown. But what we do know is that the character is going through changes that he doesn’t quite understand and it takes some time to assimilate.
I chose to view the movie Lion, a movie based on the book A Long Way Home by Saroo Brierley. This movie is about a five-year-old boy, Saroo, living in a poor, rural area in India. Saroo convinces his older brother Guddu, to let him tag along and find work in a nearby city. Saroo ends up trapped and alone in a decommissioned passenger train that takes him to Calcutta, over 1,000 miles away from his home.
During the summer of 2015, a well known lion named Cecil was killed in Zimbabwe by an American dentist, Dr. Walter James Palmer. A major uproar was caused in the media, especially since Palmer did not even hunt on legal hunting grounds. “Dr. Palmer admitted to killing Cecil and sent a statement to the Minneapolis Star Tribune stating he believed all
On February 1, Harvey Woodley, a five year old boy visited the local zoo, “Randolph’s Zoo”, in Elgin, Illinois, with his father Ralph. Towards the end of their trip they decided to visit the last exhibit. The building looked like the rest of the exhibits and there was no demarcation or any sign that indicated that the premises were privately owned and not for the public to venture. While walking towards the front door, they encountered a large German shepherd which appeared to be friendly. As it was snowing, the plaintiff innocently made a snowball and directed it towards his father, in response the father ducked and the snow got sprayed over the dog, startling it. The throw was of mild velocity and incapable of causing any injury. The dog
Negligence, as defined in Pearson’s Business Law in Canada, is an unintentional careless act or omission that causes injury to another. Negligence consists of four parts, of which the plaintiff has to prove to be able to have a successful lawsuit and potentially obtain compensation. First there is a duty of care: Who is one responsible for? Secondly there is breach of standard of care: What did the defendant do that was careless? Thirdly there is causation: Did the alleged careless act actually cause the harm? Fourthly there is damage: Did the plaintiff suffer a compensable type of harm as a result of the alleged negligent act? Therefore, the cause of action for Helen Happy’s lawsuit will be negligence, and she will be suing the warden of the Peace River Correctional Centre, attributable to vicarious liability. As well as, there will be a partial defense (shared blame) between the warden and the two employees, Ike Inkster and Melvin Melrose; whom where driving the standard Correction’s van.
In the suit against Clark Kellogg by Steve Bushak’s estate, the legal arguments on Kellogg’s side regarding the claim that Clark had a duty to rescue Steve are that (1) there was an absence of a special relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant to impose a duty of rescue and (2) the defendant would have put himself at risk of harm if he had initiated a rescue. The absence of a special relationship between Clark Kellogg and Steve Bushak is evident because the defendant did not create the hazardous situation which the plaintiff fell peril to. As the facts state, Bushak willfully “climbed on to the bench”, “jumped” over the exhibit wall and grabbed the Komodo Dragon causing his own venomous injection and consequent death. The fact of
...glected due to the severity of both acts of violence. Also, violence towards animals needs to be included in assessments for child protective services, in order to better prevent animals being placed in dangerous hands.