Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Performance appraisal literature review chapter 2 summary
Traditional performance measures
Performance appraisal literature review chapter 2 summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Performance measures have been a widely accepted managerial practice that has become a central and indispensible part of human resources management for many organisations, (Cole 2010). The overall goal of performance measurement is to ensure that all of the subsystems within the entity are working to optimum efficiency to achieve the goals outlined by the organisation (Castka, Bamher & Sharp 2003). Performance measures have been widely implemented and there is a commonly held belief amongst organisations that view performance measurement as an accurate and efficient way of linking rewards to organizationally desirable values. Additionally there is a perception amongst organisations that see performance measurement as an effective way of increasing efficiency and the human capital of the entity, (Cravens 2010). For this reason interest surrounding the use of performance measures has increased considerably over recent years and research has revealed that while measuring performance accurately, is vital and has played its part in the success of many organisations, it also suffers form significant drawbacks. These drawbacks include the biased nature of obtaining the data, reducing employee motivation and creating a stressful work environment where employees are driven to fulfill only qualitative goals.
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND ORGANISATIONAL COMMITMENT/ VALUES
In a study conducted by (Eccles 1991) it was concluded that performance measurement is an important tool that provides an official way of coupling an organisations values and cultures to rewards. His research suggest that through performance measurement organisations can actively reward employees whose values and behaviours reflect that of the organisations. This idea was t...
... middle of paper ...
...nal and job satisfaction. On the other hand research conducted by (Kerr 1975), (Campbell 1976) and (Ahmad 2010) reveal that performance measures can negatively impact an employees motivation and self efficacy if the measures are conducted with bias on or only quantitative indicators are used. It is therefore clear that while performance measurements have significant advantages it also suffers from major drawbacks. Since performance measures are such a widely used managerial tool that are commonly perceived to be an accurate indication of both an organisations and employee’s performance, it is important that management look at both sides of the picture when implementing measurement systems. This includes ensuring that both quantitative and qualitative measures are used and to ensure that employees are made aware of what tasks or behaviours are being measured.
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
There is an array of key components and factors involved in making an organization a successful business. One of those elements consists on evaluating employee’s performance; this sole component is critical in determining how effective is the organization’s productivity and which are the necessary steps to ensure proper functioning. “The performance appraisal may be one of the few times during the year where an employee and the reviewer, typically the employee's supervisor, can sit down and have a lengthy face-to-face discussion about all aspects of the job” (Joseph, 2016). Employees’ performance assessment serves as an instrument to gather important information as to which areas of the job description are being performed according to standards
Performance related pay is a financial reward given to employees whose work is considered to have reached a required standard or is above average. “PRP criteria can relate to the individual employee, to work groups or to the organization as a whole” (Armstrong, 2002). It is fair to provide people with financial rewards as a means of paying them according to their contribution (Armstrong 1993:86). The primary purpose of performance related pay in any organization is to recruit, retain and motivate the workforce. It also helps in focusing employees’ minds on particular goals (Protsik, 1966); communicate to employees an organization’s core values, and change the culture of that organization (Kessler and Purcell, 1991).
Managers are most frequently found by their subordinates unable to demonstrate a much cooperative stance in terms of telling them what information they need, using the HR metrics information included in existing reports, or even acknowledging receipt of the reports. These perceptions actually comprise the basic concern in organizations and their utilization of metrics and analytics as most managers view metrics and analytics as a simple regular task in a management policy to compute and report more metrics. There is obvious lack of communication and information regarding the assessment and report of HR metrics and the positive results in better organizational performance. Information systems help managers make different and better decisions which also include...
The Mayo Clinic (Mayo) provides a compelling and instructive example of the critical role of performance measurement in managing performance behaviors. An analysis of the Mayo approach offers insightful understanding of effective performance management practices. Accordingly, this paper reviews the Mayo performance management system from four perspectives (a) leadership strategy, (b) performance measurements, (c) human resources management, and (d) the alignment of performance with strategy. The discussion concludes with an assessment of the alignment of the elements comprising the Mayo performance management system with recommendations for strengthening those alignments.
“Using PM System doesn’t improve the performance of an organization. PM system incorporates of not only evaluating performance appraisals but also rewards. As quoted by Sheridan (2009) and Latham (2005), “the cultural maturation of performance based can take decades to implement and requires the organizations to allocate the required resources”. Technology plays a pivotal role in future of PM systems where e-monitoring of performance of employees in Hilton and other entities respectively can change the evolution of performance management thus bringing necessary and important changes to stay competitive in the market as well increasing an individual’s productivity in the company (Sheridan & Latham, 2005)”.
According to Parmenter (2011, p. 13), Key Performance Indicators (KPI) are a set of measures that assess the organisation performance on how effective the organisation achieve its objectives which are crucial for current and future success of the organisation. Key Performance Indicators (KPI) has been widely used by many organisations and for organisations to identify the right KPIs; it has to have a clear objectives and strategic directions that align with KPIs set.
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
‘If you can’t measure it, you can’t management it’, [Dan vesset and Brian, M. 2009]. Performance management is concerned with the measurement of results and with studying progress to achieving objectives base on the results. Managing performance can tell you what you’re doing well in, and also reveal areas where you need to make adjustments. Measuring performance tells you how far you’ve gone achieving your ultimate
Performance management is a management tool used to value, monitor and measure a company’s strategies that ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of its product delivery. This management tool does not focus on the organisation and on its employees as well as stakeholders. It is a continuous process that entails that managers make sure that organisational and employee values are corresponding (Aguinis, 2005,p.1/2-1/5). Performance Management brings about the competencies in the employees, increases self-esteem by giving feedback to employees, there is a low number of lawsuits because it helps understand the company better (eThekwini Municipality, 2008,p.10-11). According to Pride, Hughes and Kapoor (2011, p.288) performance management creates motivation for employees; one theory of motivation is of Expectancy, which stipulates that employees satisfaction is driven by expectations of what an organisation will offer in return.
One of the most important resources of any organization is its employees, the human resource. This makes it very important that these resources are properly managed; so that they thrive and grow along with the organization. People stream defines performance management as “A process for establishing a shared workforce understanding about what is to be achieved at an organizational level. It is about aligning the organizational objectives with the employees’ agreed skills, competency requirements, development plans and the delivery of results. The emphasis is on improvement, learning and development in order to achieve the overall business strategy and to create a high performance work force”. The performance management process involves various stages such as goal setting, skills development, performance measuring against the set goals, mentoring/coaching to enable employees to focus and achieve their goals followed by assessment of performance and any further development plans as required. Let us look at these steps one by one.
Organisations worldwide are experiencing new challenges due to the increasing of globalization, business complexity and uncertainty in the economic climate. As the business environment becomes more knowledge based, we now see organisations in a different light. They are now knowledge driven institutes that focus on performance and continuous improvement, placing greater significance on human resources, their knowledge and capabilities. Singh (2013). Greater emphasis is now placed on performance management systems as it is seen an important and critical HR activity. However performance management is not a simple and uniform process it is a complex and lengthy process that requires total commitment from all levels of the organisation.
There are several reasons organizations initiate performance evaluations, however the standard purpose for performance evaluations is to discuss performance expectations; not only from the employers perspective but to engage in a formal collaboration where the employee and the manager are both able to provide feedback in a formal discourse. There are many different processes an organization should follow when developing its performance evaluation tool; in addition essential characteristics that must accompany an effective performance appraisal process. I will discuss in detail the intent of a performance evaluation, the process an organization should follow in using its performance evaluation tool, along with the characteristics of an effective
Organization is a group of people brought to gather to achieve specific goals. Goals can be achieved if team member are performing well. Performance is the results of activities given to the employees in an organization to be achieved within specific period of time. Evaluating the current performance of employees against past performances and organizational standards is known as Performance Appraisal (Dessler, 2005). Furthermore performance appraisal helps the company know how individual employees are performing and how to improve their performance thus improving the performance of the company (Grubb, 2007). A performance appraisal is propose in which the performance management system in an organizations set work goals, determine performance standards, provide performance feedback, determine training and development needs and distribute rewards as well as evaluating an employee’s job performance during a period of time. The performance of team member is much more than appraising individuals’ works, it is managing the business, so the performance of an employee is influences by the performance of an organization. It is target to achieve the best results for the planned strategic by managing activities of employees. There are many different opinions on the performance appraisals, some organizations do performance appraisals without any aim just follow others., where some organizations do performance appraisals to make sure they have a record of a piece of paper in the employee’s file – they are careless about do corrective action. But successful organizations understand the importance of combining performance appraisals into their performance management process and strategy plan as the success of any organizatio...
Performance management is a continuous process that creates a working culture to encourage employees to improve their work performance and reach their full potential during their stay of employment. Performance Management also provides strategic direction, develop competency in employees and instill organization value. This paper will identify methods and affects that performance management plan has on the organization and their employees.