Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Australia treat asylum seekers essay
Essays on the Asylum seekers
Case study on asylum seekers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Australia treat asylum seekers essay
The ill-treatment asylum seekers receive and it has been an increasing political issue in recent political years. Asylum seekers who come by boat or planes suffer several disadvantages and have been rough handed. Asylum seekers come from countries that are in crisis/war who also make the process of getting travel documents impossible for them. What was compelling in the article? There are Campaigns to convince asylum seekers to avoid Australia and this campaign has received almost $40 million boost in the Abbott Government’s second budget (Anderson, 2015). Balogh (2015) referred to the issues that arise because Australia pulls weight on refugees/ Asylum-seekers: the Australian government gives most of their jobs to refugees, which make the average taxpayers feel offended by the …show more content…
These articles reinforced what I already had knowledge about as well as add more vital information about the current problems asylum seekers face in society and urges me to read more about the present issues related to asylum seekers and how the government intends to solve them. What made the piece a particularly good or bad piece of journalism? All articles are Good journalism keeps the society informed in times of crisis, providing the vital information found in shared experiences. Good lead because it is focused, uses effective verbs and quickly answers who and what INVOLVED, as well as the story is interesting enough where it keeps the reader engaged. It gives the right idea; it makes the reader to continue reading. It got my attention.
What made it informative? Smith (2016) mentioned that the government is determined to clear the refugee’s transits Athens’s port of Piraeus so they can begin business. Refugees do not want to move because they are scared that the new camps would not have food and water like the Greek port.
Balogh (2015) explains in detail why the government gives jobs to the refugees and why the taxpayers feel
Watching the documentary “Go Back To Where You Came From” regarding the issues of Asylum Seekers and Refugees, I am disgusted about the way that Australia has been treating Asylum Seekers and Refugees. That is why I am writing you this letter to promote and voice my view on the treatment to refugees, the Stop the Boats Policy and ways to minimise this Issue.
An extraordinary 65.3 million Refugees have been displaced around the world. In 2015 Australia took 12,000 of them. But where are Australians placing these Refugees? Australia is deporting these Refugees to a third country, either on Manus or Nauru Island. These Islands have reports of inhumane and cruel treatment towards Refugees For those who aren’t fully aware of what Refugees are; they are people whom come to Australia illegally without the appropriate visas. They cannot obtain these visas because of the reasons they are fleeing their country … their Government. None the less it should be the Australian Government they fear. The concepts of refugees are kept hidden away from us by our own Government in reflection of their Governments own self-interest. This tragedy is classified as a modern day witch hunt.
Phillips, J. (2011), ‘Asylum seekers and refugees: What are the facts?’, Background note, Parliamentry library, Canberra.
I ask you now to imagine such a life. It is impossible for us to imagine having to flee our homes and family simply because our beliefs or lifestyle are not deemed suitable. Furthermore, paying thousands of dollars to travel across treacherous oceans in shabby boats. The fact that asylum seekers are prepared to remain locked up in detention centres and be deprived of their freedom must surely tell us of the horrific circumstances from which they have fled. ******** PUT IN CLOSING PARAGRAPH.
The term government policy is any cause of action implemented by the government to change a certain situation and to tackle a wide range of issues in all areaslikefinance,education,statewelfare,immigrationlaw(https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/articles/government-policy).For the purpose of this essay, I will be talking more about government policies in relation to refugees and asylum seekers and its implication for social work.
Although, asylum seekers and refugees are given a few options if they feel as though their rights are being breached, like they can apply to tribunals and courts to view their visa related decisions, they can also make a complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission about their human rights being breached in immigration detention centres, yet they do not have control over who enters the country, the government is not obliged to comply with the recommendations that are made. Although the government had made few attempts to comply with the human right obligations towards asylum seekers and refugees by introducing new policies and prioritising the safety of the children in these detention camps, there are currently still many breaches towards their rights that the government continues to adapt, therefore they are still constituting a breach of international law
They have been found to have detrimental psychological effects, as they leave refugees in a state of limbo, fearing their imminent forced return, where they are unable to integrate into society. This emotional distress is often compounded by the fact that refugees on TPVs in Australia are not able to apply for family reunification nor are they able to leave the country. Family reunification is a well-established right in Sweden, as well as most western countries. Moreover, it is a human right protected under the ICCPR whereby refugees have the right to family (Article 23) and the right to freedom from arbitrary interference with family life (Article 17). As a result of living in a state of uncertainty and heartache caused by family separation, refugees on TPVs face a “700 percent increased risk of developing depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in comparison with PPV (permanent protection visa) refugees (Mansouri et al. 2009, pp. 145). Denial of family reunification under TPVs is likely to cause more asylum seekers to engage in illegal means to arrive in
Many people in the UK coupled with media stories, tend to portray asylum seekers as bogus individuals who are here purely for economic gains (Teater 2014). This has led organisations such as Refugee councils and Refugee Action
bitter by the hand outs in given to the asylum seekers in the way of
Asylum seeker issue is a complex and continuing struggle between the heart and the head. It will continue to haunt us as long as Australia shines to be an oasis of space, peace and prosperity in a global sea of overcrowding and escalating suffering.
It is evident current domestic law in regards to the treatment of refugees provides a leeway of extensive financial burden and most importantly inhumane treatment of detainees. It is questionable however, whether Australia is able to achieve justice for detainees by breaking its domestic law and reforming its priority towards the United Nations Convention Relating to the status of refugees the country is signatory of. Australia has statistically implanted just 10 per cent of the 145 recommendation it has accepted under the United Nations Convention Relating to the status of refugees. It is arguably acknowledged by surrounding nations, by furthering Australia’s refugee treatment on the basis of international law detainees will be off subject to less inhumane practices. It is further evident by breaking Australia’s domestic law with the relevant issue, children and refugees will be subject to subdued environments ultimately altering their physical and mental stress. Public pressure is deemed as a vital tool in order to reform policies and procedures. Nora Hannagan argues that society as a collective and individuals within it must take responsibility for the harms which result from
In 1954 Australia chose to commit to the 1951 Refugee Convention. This convention reinstated the dignity and equality of all persons, and therefore Australia became obliged to the acceptance and humane treatment of asylum seekers (Glendenning, 2015). However, over the recent years, asylum seeker policies such as ‘stop the boats’ have instead become a parliamentary campaign, ignoring the focus on humane treatment as well as the human, moral and legal obligations made clear in the Refugee Convention (Glendenning, 2015).
To a sovereign nation, the current treatment of asylum seekers may seem lawful as they are exercising their rights. Internationally, however, the procedures and execution of how Australia handle their asylum seeker ‘problem’ conflicts greatly with International law and treaties, to which they were ratified. As a result, Australia is left in a political and lawful bind between the complexities and intricate nature of the United Nations and Australian Government laws and legislation. Whilst the United Nations claim Australia is violating a multitude of their International Conventions, such as the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention.
Burnett,J and Whyte,D. (2011) The Wages of Fear: Risk, Safety and Undocumented Work, Leeds and Liverpool, Positive Action for Refugees and Asylum Seekers (PAFRAS) University of Leeds and the University of Liverpool
Our moral duty to Syrian refugees. National Post. N.p. 15 January 2014. Web.