Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is adnan syed innocent or guilty
Is adnan syed innocent or guilty
Is adnan syed innocent or guilty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is adnan syed innocent or guilty
Imagine being accused of a murder you didn't commit. You have to go through long questionings and long trials. Usually, they realize it isn't you but 4.1% of people accused of murder are wrongly accused(Hughes). Seventeen years old, Adnan Syed was accused of murdering his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee. This case was brought to attention by Sarah Koenig when she created a podcast about it. After Sarah's segments, she did every week where she investigated Adnan's case it has become clearer. Adnan Syed was wrongly convicted of the murder of Hae Lee, but how could he really murder her if he really cared about her and had no ill will toward her. Adnan Syed loved Hae Lee while they dated but after they broke up he was sad but then like most teenage …show more content…
boys moved on very quickly. Adnan's friend Saad Chaudry told Koening that “He’s a player! Adnan was dating multiple girls!”(Koenig, “The Breakup”). Saads comments are explaining that Adnan moved on. He was not at all obsessed with Hae. Adnan was “cute and charming” as one of his ladies put it. Also, Adnan was receiving phone calls from multiple girls at night. His mom told Sarah about how she would sometimes answer and just listen but then her son would realize and say something along the lines of mom I know you're there (Koenig, “The Breakup”). He acknowledged her in such a sweet way. He could have been mean and yelled at her to get off but he didn't. A study done at Binghamton University showed how men typically feel less pain when a relationship ends(Kim). So Adnan being a man and a so said player makes you realize that he was not obsessed with Hae and moved on fairly quickly. Adnan moved on quickly when Hae and him broke up leaving him with no motive to kill over obsession. Discrimination.
A word that means so many different things to so many different people. During the time period that they were investigating this case and throughout the trial Adnan faced a lot of discrimination. The minute he became a suspect his mother believed that he faced discrimination. She said that “he was an easy target” and “We still don’t know why they’re doing it, but again it’s discrimination. Because we are Muslim, and we are minor in this country” (Koening, “The best defense is a good defense”). Adnan was an easy target because he is a minority says his mom. The police usually check the ex-boyfriends and family members but to pick Adnan, a Muslim boy of Pakistani heritage, over Don, a white American boy, kinda seems a little odd. Adnan's mom also talked about how she has been in America for a while now and she never felt discrimination before the trial or even after 9/11 but on the day of the trial, she felt a lot of discrimination (Koenig,“A Best Defense Is a Good Defense”). A trial room should be a place with no discrimination. If the judge felt there was discrimination he should have shut it down right away so it didn't change the jury's mind. Vicki Walsh, the person who was trying to make sure he didn't get bail said that, “ there is a pattern in the United States of America where young Pakistani males have been jilted, have committed murder, and have fled to Pakistan and we have been unable to extradite them back” (Koenig, “The Best Defense Is a Good …show more content…
Defense”). She also brought up a case in Chicago and talked about how they are very similar and she doesn't want Adnan to flee like the Chicago boy did (Koenig, “The Best Defense Is a Good Defense”). She was incorrect in her second claim. The only similarities between the two cases were that there were both Pakistani boys. Nothing else was the same. There is also not a pattern of young Pakistani men committing murder after they’d been jilted and then running off to Pakistan. There was a lot of discrimination during this trial from the prosecution side, which could have pushed the jury to believe Jay's story. Jay was a known drug dealer and could not seem to get his story straight about the day Hae Lee was murdered.
So many inconsistencies and the prosecutors still used him as their main witness. One thing Jay changed between two interviews was whether or not he helped dig Haes greave. In the first taped statement Jay claims that he refused to help Adnan dig a grave for Hae. Whereas in the second taped statement he tells the police that they both dug Haes grave (Koenig,“Inconsistencies”). This is a weird thing to forget. Manually digging a hole in the ground just big enough for a body is something memorable. At the beginning when they first discovered her body he was a suspect. If he would have told them right away that he helped bury her body the police wouldn't have been as kind to him so, he lied to make himself sound better. Another thing Jay changed in his story was when he knew that Adnan was planning to kill Hae. During the first interview, he told the police that he didn't know until the day of the murder that Adnan was going to kill Hae. Then during the second interview, he told them that he knew about it about four or five days before (Koenig,“inconsistencies”). Again during the first interview, he probably lied to make himself sound better but either way he knew beforehand and he should have notified the police or someone. Especially if he knew four to five days in advance like he said in the second interview. Not to mention the fact that Jay admitted to the cops that
he lied to them. During the third interview, the cops asked Jay why he lied he said that “[he] was trying to cover up that he bought and sold marijuana” (Simpson). If Jay is willing to repeatedly lie to the cops in order to avoid getting in trouble for buying and selling marijuana, why would he not be willing to lie in order to avoid getting in trouble for murder? As has been noted, Jay had many inconsistencies and should not have been used as the main so-called credible witness. It may be true that Adnan could have killed Hae in those 22 minutes however, he had no room for error or dilly-dallying. When Sarah and Dana went through the day the guessed on how long it would take them to do everything that was said they did. When they reenacted it they guessed it would have taken about one and a half minutes into the car for the actual killing part (Koenig,“Route Talk”). Now, Hae was an athletic girl and could have fought back, she could have scratched him, kicked him, anything to defend herself, but the way the timeline makes it seem it didn't take very long. Also if she would have scratched him in any form of self-defense she would have had skin cells under her fingernails and then they would have had concrete evidence on who did it. Even though Adnan could have murdered Hae in those quick 22 minutes it would have been very hard to do. By looking at all the evidence Adnan Syed could not have possibly murdered Hae Lee. Adnan had no reason to kill Hae, he was poorly represented in court and was unfairly testified, and Jay was too involved to not face any punishment. He is still serving time for a crime he did not commit. Sadly he is not the only one and Haes case could have easily become one of the one-third of murder cases where they never find the culprit instead of the four percent where people are wrongly convicted(Hughes). Imagine if you were in Adnan's shoes. Why are we just sitting back and letting this happen? We need to come together and make it so cases like this never happen.
What would you do if you were convicted of a crime you didn’t do? The story of Serial narrated by Sarah Koenig is about a man named Adnan Syed. Adna Syed was wrongly convicted of killing his ex girlfriend Hae Min Lee.Jay Wilds is a friend of Adnan who used to smoke weed with him sometimes after school,but he is also a suspect in the case. This story is interesting because Koenig is trying to find out who the murderer is of Hae Min Lee or if Adnan can be proven innocent. Believe that Adnan is innocent of the murdering of Hae Min Lee because one piece of evidence which are letters that a woman named Asia wrote to Adnan claiming that she saw Adna that day and at the time Hae was murdered at the library and that she even had a little chat with him. Another piece of evidence is that Best Buy tweeted a tweet saying that they never had a payphone which Jay claims that Adna called him from to come pick him up.
In the first taped statement, Jay says he refused to help dig a grave for Hae. Two weeks later, he says they both dug the hole.
But, unlike Adan, Jay got off free of charge. Why is that? At the beginning he did not cooperate with the police. He was a drug dealer at the time and seeing as it was the 90s the drug laws were incredibly harsh. Perhaps, that's how he worked a deal out for himself. But lets face it, behind closed doors one will never know what truly happened. Our law is corrupt and twisted and so are the people protecting us. When Jay decided to work with the police there are documents missing of him being questioned by two detectives. We know that Jay spent more than a couple hours speaking to the detectives during this mysterious session, we also know that their session was never documented--meaning we have no utter clue what was truly being said behind those doors. Is that when jay worked a deal and pulled
based on the story of one witness, Adnan’s friend Jay, who testified that he helped
First of all, if something monumental happens a person remembers the day it happened. In contrast, Adnan didn’t remember January 13. Yet, Jay remembers close to everything which points an arrow in his direction. However, Adnan says he didn’t ask Hae for a ride, but witnesses say he did. We can point that at Adnan for lying, but he may have failed
Jay had some big inconsistencies in the stories of what happened that day. (The Alibi) Also just the fact that Adnan agreed to do the whole Serial season with Sarah. An innocent man would not be able to do that without spilling some kind of information. Adnan had more things making him more suspicious of being the murderer. The main thing that points fingers at Adnan is the Nisha call. (“Route Talk”) There was a call from Adnan's phone the day of the murder to Nisha while Adnan said he was at track practice. He told the court Jay had his phone during that time, but Jay and Nisha did not know each other, so why would they talk to each other for two minutes and 22 seconds (Koenig, “The Case Against Adnan Syed”)?
This was something that honestly suited Adnan’s defense more than Jay’s. Remember when I said “He didn’t seem like some sort of assasinator?” Well, he really wasn’t. Why would he kill Hae anyway? Hae and Adnan had dated for about two years, but during the end, it’s like most high school relationships. Someone in the group, or both members, eventually lost interest and break up, which in this case, Hae was the one who broke up. She fell in love with another person, named Don. When they had a break up, Adnan was emotional, and upset. Now, that would make sense, but that was two months before Hae’s death. Why would Adnan kill Hae 2 months after they broke up? I mean, he was described as a player, and sometimes he’d cheat on her. Even after they broke up, many friends his said Adnan eventually got over it.
Jay describes his active-involvement with Adnan in the crime. If Jay tells us the truth, he brings Adnan to school, holds onto Adnan’s cellphone and car so he could pick Adnan up when Adnan calls; picks Adnan up after he committed the murder, cruises around with Adnan, and brings Adnan to track practice. Additionally, Jay cruises around with Adnan in the afternoon, accompanies Adnan to LeakIn park and aids Adnan in digging the hole to bury Hae. Which criminal incriminates oneself? When Jay speaks about picking up Adnan he says: “I noticed that Hae wasn't with him. I parked next to him. He asked me to get out the car. I get out the car. He asks me, am I ready for this? And I say, ready for what? And he takes the keys. He opens the trunk. And all I can see is Hae's lips are all blue, and she's pretzeled up in the back of the trunk. And she's dead.” Jay goes to pick up Adnan from the actual murder and describes the episode in detail. Jay uses short sentences for dramatic effect, and speaks confidently, which is unusual when incriminating
Jeffrey Dahmer was born May 21st, 1960, the first child for Lionel and Joyce Dahmer, after a difficult pregnancy that had Joyce on various prescription drugs.
Adnan didn’t take this very well. According to Reddit, Hae even wrote in her diary that she felt Adnan was not accepting the breakup well, and that at times she was feeling menaced by his behavior.
Juror #10, a garage owner, segregates and divides the world stereotypically into ‘us’ and ‘them.’ ‘Us’ being people living around the rich or middle-class areas, and ‘them’ being people of a different race, or possessing a contrasting skin color, born and raised in the slums (poorer parts of town). It is because of this that he has a bias against the young man on trial, for the young man was born in the slums and was victim to domestic violence since the age of 5. Also, the boy is of a Hispanic descent and is of a different race than this juror, making him fall under the juror’s discriminatory description of a criminal. This is proven on when juror #10 rants: “They don’t need any real big reason to kill someone, either. You know, they get drunk, and bang, someone’s lying in the gutter… most of them, it’s like they have no feelings (59).
After a lengthy two hundred and fifty-two-day trial “not guilty” were the words that left the world in shock. O.J Simpson was your typical golden boy. He had it all, the nice car, the football career, and his kids. Unfortunately, this all came to an end when two bodies came to be spotted deceased in Nicole Browns front yard and was a gruesome sight. O. J’s ex-wife Nicole Brown and her friend Ronald Goldman both found with brutal stab marks. Unfortunately, all his glory days now brought to an end, he went from playing on the field to begging for his freedom when becoming the main suspect of their murders. Since this trial has not only altered the way Americans viewed celebrities, but it also racially divided society,
On December 18th 2015 Netflix aired with great popularity a 10 part documentary series called “making a Murderer” The documentary, written by Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demo, present the case of Steven Avery; a convicted murderer exonerated on DNA evidence after serving 18 years for the assault and attempted murder of Penny Beerntsen. The writers present the series in a way that suggest that Avery was framed by the Manitowoc Country police department. and present that the police planted evidence to frame Steven Avery because he had been exonerated from the previous crime. The ethical problem with this as is presented by Kathryn Schulz in The New Yorker, is that the documentary argues their case so passionately that they leave out important
On the morning of July 4, 1954, Marilyn Sheppard was violently beaten in her home in Bay Village, Ohio, on the shore of Lake Erie. She was four months pregnant and had been felled by 35 vicious blows (Quade). Right away Sam Sheppard was accused of being the victim to do this. Sheppard had told investigators that he had been asleep downstairs and was awakened by his wife’s screams. Sheppard said when he went upstairs and entered the room he was knocked unconscious by the intruder. He denied any involvement and described his battle with the killer he described as “bushy-haired” (Linder). After a police investigation, Dr. Sam Sheppard was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. With the hectic media covering it, they were quick in decision that it was him that committed the murder. This was an unfair trial, ruined a man’s life, and gave him no time for a career.
Turner, Billy. 1986. “Race and Peremptory Challenges During Voir Dire: Do Prosecution and Defense Agree?” Journal of Criminal Justice 14: 61-69.