Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The fall of absolutism
The fall of absolutism
The fall of absolutism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
During the early 1600s, a series of crop failures termed the "little ice age" wrecked havoc in Europe. This period was quickly followed by the Price Revolution, a massive inflation due to a currency surplus, which destroyed the European economy. Both of these events greatly weakened the current feudal government, allowing absolute monarchs to establish power over their countries. Many of these monarchs took similar paths when gaining power, mimicking each other in their ideas and actions. In the 1600s and 1700s, absolute monarchs similarly grew and consolidated their power by supporting the image of divine right, asserting control over the nobility, and growing their militaries.
Many absolute monarchs consolidated their power by establishing
…show more content…
and maintaining the idea of Divine Right. Divine right is the idea that a king or queen has been chosen by God to rule over their given land. Louis XIV placed this image upon himself by giving himself the nickname "The Sun King". This nickname created the idea that everything revolves around him and that he answers to no one except God. This strategy was particularly powerful because religion was everything in the 16 and 17 hundreds. By associating himself with religion, Louis XIV made himself a part of everyday life, reinforcing the idea of him as an absolute ruler. The idea of divine right was also used by the English monarchs Louis I and Charles I. Both of these monarchs believed that any restraints on their power were challenges to their authority as a ruler. They believed that they had been chosen by God to rule England and that they only answered to him. Both Louis and Charles impressed this idea upon their people while gaining control as absolute monarchs. Many absolute monarchs, including Louis XIV, Louis I, and Charles I, used the idea of divine right to strengthen and maintain their power. All absolute monarchs grew their power by establishing greater control over the nobility. In France, Louis XIV built the palace of Versailles and required nobles to live there at least 6 months out of the year. Louis XIV, by keeping the nobles in a centralized location, was able to keep a closer eye on them, ensuring that they did not plot any kind of rebellion or harvest disloyalty. Peter the Great of Russia used St. Petersburg in a similar way, having the nobles build grand stone castles and palaces and forcing them to reside there a vast majority of the year. Frederick William, termed "The Great Elector", also asserted noble control but in a varying way. Frederick William reduced the Junker's power by imposing high taxes that drained their funds, using war and defense as a reason why. Before these taxes, the Prussian king was completely depended on the Junker class when it came to economics. By taking away this power, Frederick William took away one of the few things that restricted royal power in regards to the noble class. Regardless of who they were or where they were from, all absolute monarchs increased their power by placing greater restrictions on the nobility. Finally, absolute monarchs in the 1600s and 1700s increased their power by growing and improving their military.
Frederick William I, the "Soldier King", consolidated his power by forcing all men to receive military training so that they could be kept in reserve. The only way for a king to raise an army previously was to ask the nobility if they could borrow their guards. Frederick William I, by creating his own military, became a completely independent absolute monarch. Louis XIV created a French army in this image, going as far as to standardize uniforms, weapons, and training regiments. Despite all of these military improvements, the most significant change was in Russia. Peter the Great, after returning from a tour of Western Europe, realizes that a great country is determined by its strong military and is determined to create one of his own. Peter the Great not only required all nobles to serve in the military but he forced every man, peasant or noble, to start at the same rank. This simple move not only increased military power but decreased the power of the nobility as well, creating an ideal situation for absolute power. Every great nation needs a military and all great absolute rulers established a firm military presence on their quest for
power. In the 1600s and 1700s, nearly all successful absolute monarchs advanced and maintained their power through the use of Divine Right, noble control, and military advancement. Though previous events greatly weakened Europe, the acts of absolute monarchs united their countries, allowing the majority of them to persevere and continue to this very day.
Peter the Great was trying ultimately to make the Russian Empire more Europeanized or Westernized. He wanted to protect and enhance the vulnerable Russian Empire. Peter the Great saw that other European countries are colonizing in other regions like the New World, Asia, and Africa. Peter saw this as a threat and didn’t want for the Europeans to conquer Russia. Through decrees to shave and provisions on dress, he was trying to make them European. He also wanted to make military and economic reforms that could help the empire itself. If they built factories, they didn’t need to get supplies from Europe.
First, both Louis and Peter had noble uprisings early in their reigns, but they handled them and got somewhat on the good side with their nobles. Peter the Great created a Service Nobility, and demanded all nobles, or boyars as they are called in Russia, serve in the civil service
During the 16th and 17th centuries a new type of ruling emerged as a result of unorganized government called royal absolutism. This type of government was seen in many European countries including France and Russia where King Louis XIV and Peter the Great ruled respectively. Both had ways of ruling that were similar to each other and different to each other. Politically, economically and socially both Louis XIV and Peter the Great were similar to and different from how they ruled and what their reign resulted.
Monarchy was not at all a new institution in the 15th, 16th, or 17th centuries. It wasn’t even very different with respect to the goals that prevailed in each monarchy. However, the differences between the New and Absolute Monarchy come in the way of the methods, theories, and conditions prevalent throughout the different monarchical reigns.
While the two kings had many differences their militaries were surprisingly similar. They both had military troops that guarded and walked around the palace. The kings’ military was not only used for protection but also for spreading their beliefs and ideals. Their military was alert and ready to protect if there was to be an attack on the palace. King Louis XIV and Philip II both would have enough troops to go to war and express their thoughts but also enough to protect the palace.
During the reigns of King Louis XIV of France and King Peter I of Russia, also known as Peter the Great, the nobility was under strict control to limit its power and status in society and government. Both autocrats, or absolute rulers, put the nobles in an area separate from the rest of society to keep them under close watch. The kings’ opinion in religion also impacted the status and power of the nobility because most of them were skilled Protestants. This would prove itself as a problem in the long run for Louis XIV. Overall, Peter the Great and Louis XIV despised the nobility and their power in the government and went to many measures to subdue them.
I really enjoyed this video. It's crazy the amount of informaton that gets packed into a three minute video. I think the cartoon and music that accompanies it helps because you're being entertained as well as informed. I think it's easier for me to remember a fun fact from the video versus reading a whole chapter from a book.
Absolute monarchs ruled though the policy of absolutism. Absolutism declared that the king ruled though divine right with a legitimate claim to sole and uncontested authority (French State Building and Louis XIV). On this basis, Louis XIV of France and Suleiman I of the Ottoman Empire were both absolute monarchs. Each ruler believed that his power belonged to him and him alone due to divine right. They showed their absolute power by living lavishly, increased their power by waging wars, and kept their power by ensuring complete loyalty of their subjects.
A Comparison of the Characteristics of the Absolutist Rule of Charles I of England and Louis XIV of France
Of all the absolute rulers in Europe, by far the best example of one, and the most powerful, was Louis XIV of France. Although Louis had some failures, he also had many successes. He controlled France’s money and had many different ways to get, as well as keep his power, and he knew how to delegate jobs to smart, but loyal people.
Louis XIV (the fourteenth) was an absolute monarch. He was often called "the Sun King," and ruled over France. He devoted himself to helping France achieve economic, political, and cultural prominence. Many historians believe the phrase "absolute power corrupts absolutely" mirrors Louis' reign. Louis XIV revoked the Edict on Nantes, changing the economy of France in one motion. By creating the city of Versailles and being a major patron of the arts, Louis was very influential on French culture. He made France go almost bankrupt from his costly wars and failures. Louis was very corrupt in his power, and it shown in all he did to change France; he got what he wanted, when he wanted it.
Peter the Great had many goals during the time he ruled. One of his biggest goals was to modernize and westernize Russia. The main reason Peter the Great modernized Russia was because he did not want the country he ruled to be left vulnerable to expansionist powers in Europe. The powers were constantly at war, fighting to take over each other’...
Frederick the Great was son of King Frederick William I and was born into prince hood. Frederick was raised to become a strong soldier and thrifty administrator. Frederick did not like the life his father planned for him and choose the more artsy aspects of life. His crown as prince was taken from him until he reapplied himself as a loyal member under his father’s reign. Frederick took over power after his father’s death in 1840; almost immediately he began attempting to improve Prussian policy. By 1745 Frederick was seen as a more than able military leader after winning a second war with Austria. Frederick played a huge role in destroying Austrians dominance. Frederick was a good leader, keeping himself in touch with the work of his officials and kept an eye on his troops and officers.
When Louis the XIV began his rule in 1643, his actions immediately began to suggest and absolute dictatorship. Because of the misery he had previously suffered, one of the first things he did was to decrease the power of the nobility. He withdrew himself from the rich upper class, doing everything secretly. The wealth had no connection to Louis, and therefore all power they previously had was gone. He had complete control over the nobles, spying, going through mail, and a secret police force made sure that Louis had absolute power. Louis appointed all of his officials, middle class men who served him without wanting any power. Louis wanted it clear that none of his power would be shared. He wanted "people to know by the rank of the men who served him that he had no intention of sharing power with them." If Louis XIV appointed advisors from the upper classes, they would expect to gain power, and Louis was not willing to give it to them. The way Louis XIV ruled, the sole powerful leader, made him an absolute ruler. He had divine rule, and did not want to give any power to anyone other than himself. These beliefs made him an absolute ruler.
Frightfully stimulated as a child from a home intrusion by Parisians during an aristocratic revolt in 1651, Louis XIV realized his rule would be decisive, militant, and absolute (458). His lengthy reign as Frances’ king and how he ruled would be the example that many countries throughout Europe would model their own regimes under. With this great authority also came greater challenges of finance and colonization. In the 17th century, the era of absolute monarchs was the means to restore European life (458). Louis XIV exemplified absolutism, and his ruling set the example for other monarchs throughout Europe.