A Comparison of the Characteristics of the Absolutist Rule of Charles I of England and Louis XIV of France

1583 Words4 Pages

A Comparison of the Characteristics of the Absolutist Rule of Charles I of England and Louis XIV of France While both the French and English empires were growing overseas, the modern system of great powers was evolving in Europe itself. France became Europe's superpower in the 1600's. Louis XIV, the "Sun King," served as a model of absolute royal power. England in the 1600's, by contrast, provided an early example of more democratic rule as Parliament limited the power of monarchs. From the 1560's to the 1590's, religious wars between Huguenots (French Protestants) and the Catholic majority tore France apart. Leaders on each side used the war to make themselves look better. Two of the lead families (one from each side) wanted to replace the declining Valois dynasty. The worst of the fighting began on St. Bartholomew's Day, August 24, 1572. At a wedding, violence erupted that lead to 3,000 Huguenot deaths. In the coming days, many more were murdered. St. Bartholomew's Day stood for the breakdown of France. In 1589, Henry of Navarre inherited the throne and became known as Henry IV. He became Catholic so the French population would support him in his efforts. When he dies in 1610, his nine year old son, Louis XIII inherited the throne. In 1624, Louis made Cardinal Armand Richelieu his chief minister. He spent 18 years strengthening the central government. Richelieu was determined to destroy the power of the nobles and the Huguenots, two groups that would not tolerate royal authority. He defeated their armies and destroyed their castles. He got them back by giving those positions at court or in the army. Richelieu outlawed their armies... ... middle of paper ... ... occasionally died on the battlefield or were murdered by rivals. But, this was the first time that a ruling monarch had been tried and executed by his own people. The parliamentary forces had sent a clear signal that, in England, no ruler could claim absolute power and ignore the rule of law. Louis outlived his sons and grandsons. When he died in 1715, his five year old great-grandson inherited the throne as Louis XV. Louis XV was far too weak a king to deal with all the problems in France. He neglected his duties and squandered any hope for a positive tenure as king. He knew reform was needed, but he left that up to a future leader. English rulers still had a lot of power, but they had to deal with Parliament. In the age of absolute monarchy elsewhere in Europe, a limited monarchy in England was radical enough.

Open Document