Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research paper of abraham Lincoln
Research paper of abraham Lincoln
Research paper of abraham Lincoln
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Research paper of abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln: The Great Emancipator, a man raised from humble origins, top hat, sixteenth President of the United States, Preserver of the Union, and a common man; throughout the entirety of the semester, we saw these stereotypes of President Lincoln in the readings and films we watched each week. Once we delved further into the semester, however, we learned that these stereotypes were a direct result of the slanted sense of historical memory that we were taught in our history books. The more works we read and watched, the more diverse and complex Mr. Lincoln seemed to be from those history books; he went from a martyr dying for his beliefs to the worst president of his time, from a savior to the African Americans to King Africanus the racist, …show more content…
Immediately, we saw a contrast in the overall demeanor of the characters of Abraham Lincoln. The movie focused on the powerful, God-like aspects of Mr. Lincoln as he confidently wielded a shiny, silver axe and never seemed to question any of his decisions. Even when he came to the tough decision of whether or not to bring his son Willie back from the dead and make him into a vampire, he specifically told his wife and close friends he would not because of his belief on the evils of vampirism. If we took a look at President Lincoln’s attitude in the novel, however, he was much more susceptible to the feelings of a normal human being, such as grief and depression. After the death of his beloved Ann Rutledge, Lincoln stated his depressed, suicidal thoughts when he said, “I do not wish to live without her” (Grahame-Smith, pg. 159). Compared to the movie, the novel knocked Abe’s confidence level down several notches so that a common man reader could relate more to President Lincoln. Also, as we looked further into the movie, we saw something for the first time in relation to Mary Todd Lincoln: she made a constructive effort in the advancement of Abraham Lincoln’s character instead of nagging Lincoln throughout their marriage until she later became depressed. Mary Todd’s demeanor matched suit with Lincoln’s powerfulness in the movie, and we saw her play an active role in ending the Civil War by delivering the silver to the Union Army. In the novel, it was the same story we saw all semester with Mary Todd. Her opinion or voice contained little to no value, and she thought that “the only peace in this [her] life is the end of it” (Grahame-Smith, pg. 284). Another crucial contrast within the film and the book was Mr. Lincoln’s sidekicks. Abe was accompanied by a black man that he had met in his past while he watched a slave woman be
Dilorenzo, Thomas J.. The Real Lincoln: a new look at Abraham Lincoln, his agenda, and an unnecessary war. Roseville, Calif: Prima, 2002
Williams portrays Lincoln in a very positive light, allowing the reader to realize the greatness of Lincoln, in his compassion, strategy, statesmanship and lack of ego. Williams has provided numerous instances wherein he provides ample support to his arguments and facts. In spite of the unnecessary detail and verbosity that Williams sometimes uses, there is no doubt that this book is a remarkable insight into Lincoln’s persona.
In “The Presidency of Abraham Lincoln,” Phillip Shaw Paludan argues that even though Abraham Lincoln faced unparalleled challenges, Lincoln was America’s greatest president as he preserved the Union and freed the slaves. According to Paludan, Lincoln’s greatness exceeds that of all other American presidents as Lincoln’s presidential service was remarkable in both the obstacles he faced as well as the ways in which he overcame them. Before accepting the distinguished chair in Lincoln studies at the University of Illinois, Springfield, Paludan was a professor of history at the University of Kansas for over 30 years. Paludan has authored several books including Victims: A True Story of the Civil War and A People’s Contest: The Union and Civil
James Oakes gave a brilliant and unique perspective to a relationship between two well known historical figures of their time. Abraham Lincoln is a well-admired president for the United States because as Americans culture teaches that he was an honest and well-respected man. He heard about a young African American man, who had high aspirations for his life and the blossoming United States. This man’s name was Frederick Douglass. James Oakes demonstrates how both Douglass and Lincoln worked towards the abolishment of slavery and effectively producing better outcomes within antislavery politics.
Out of the 43 presidents that have served for the United States, the most recognizable and exceptional president by far was Abraham Lincoln. Through childhood, Lincoln seemed always interested in politics, not knowing how much publicity and significance he would get. The three authors of the Grace Bedell and the President’s Beard, Lincoln’s Famous Address, and The Rise of a President all agree with the fact that Lincoln was a fanonimal president. During just four years of office, Lincoln made a memorable picture for himself, led a war between many different parts of the U. S., and made one of the greatest speeches the nation has ever seen.
Abraham Lincoln’s original views on slavery were formed through the way he was raised and the American customs of the period. Throughout Lincoln’s influential years, slavery was a recognized and a legal institution in the United States of America. Even though Lincoln began his career by declaring that he was “anti-slavery,” he was not likely to agree to instant emancipation. However, although Lincoln did not begin as a radical anti-slavery Republican, he eventually issued his Emancipation Proclamation, which freed all slaves and in his last speech, even recommended extending voting to blacks. Although Lincoln’s feeling about blacks and slavery was quite constant over time, the evidence found between his debate with Stephen A. Douglas and his Gettysburg Address, proves that his political position and actions towards slavery have changed profoundly.
Throughout history we often see Abraham Lincoln as a great president, whose words and action inspire people throughout the nation to change the mindset of how we think about the importance of human lives regardless of race and ethnic groups. His journey toward changing the people perspective on the moral issue of slavery is no easy task to accomplished. But his action however, it did leave an everlasting impact for many African American that being chain by the cruel acts of slavery to experience freedom for the first time. And his Lincoln’s legacy would inspire other individuals to take a stand on their ideas and fight for the freedom of our fellow man. Individuals, such as Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King Jr take pride on their belief to fight for the equality their race and to unite the nation as one. In the book “The Fiery Trial” by
. .’, concludes James Oakes’ book with the aftermath of the Civil War and Lincoln’s assassination. Oakes discussed the respect Douglass gathered for Lincoln over the years and the affect his assassination had on both himself and America as a whole. Oakes even brushed over Douglass’ relationship with Andrew Johnson, the president succeeding Lincoln. Analyzing his experience with the new president, it was safe to say that Andrew Johnson had no consideration as to what Douglass and Lincoln previously fought for. Johnson did not have the same political skills as Lincoln did, and he did not retain the same view for America that Lincoln did. It was obvious that Douglass held Lincoln at a higher standard than Andrew Johnson, stating that he was a “progressive man, a humane man, an honorable man, and at heart an anti-slavery man” (p. 269). Oakes even gave his own stance on Andrew Jackson, “It was a legacy that Andrew Johnson could ever match. When all of Lincoln’s attributes were taken into consideration - his ascent from the obscurity to greatness, his congenial temperament, his moral courage - it was easy for Douglass to imagine how much better things would be ‘had Mr. Lincoln been living today’.” (p. 262). It is hard to imagine the pre-war Douglass to have said something like that as opposed to an older, much more reserved Douglass. With the abolishment of slavery, so came much discrimination. Without
Abraham Lincoln deserves the accolade “The Great Emancipator”. The title “Great Emancipator” has been the subject of many controversies. Some people have argued that the slaves themselves are the central story in the achievement of their own freedom. Others demonstrate that emancipation could result from both a slave’s own extraordinary heroism and the liberating actions of the Union forces. However, my stance is to agree that Abraham Lincoln deserves to be regarded as “The Great Emancipator” for his actions during and following the Civil War.
During the Abraham Lincoln’s short time as president, he managed not only to save a nation deeply divided and at war with itself, but to solidify the United States of America as a nation dedicated to the progress of civil rights. Years after his death, he was awarded the title of ‘The Great Emancipator.’ In this paper, I will examine many different aspects of Lincoln’s presidency in order to come to a conclusion: whether this title bestowed unto Lincoln was deserved, or not. In order to fully understand Lincoln, it is necessary to understand the motives that drove this man to action. While some of his intentions may not have been for the welfare of slaves, but for the preservation of the Union, the actions still stand. Abraham Lincoln, though motivated by his devotion to his nation, made the first blows against the institution of slavery and rightfully earned his title of ‘The Great Emancipator.’
He was sitting back in the movie and I know that they didn 't want to show him the whole time but he wasn 't able to show all his features I thought. Now Lincoln today as president would be interesting. I would want to see how he feels about everything that is going on. His morals would still be the same but the world he lived in is completely different then the world were all living in now. Money exceeds more than what people can talk about but I think that Lincoln would still be able to sway people to what he thought was morally right. I wish that Lincoln could be our president now. I feel that he was a hard and driven person by what the movie showed and got what he wanted. Thats what type of president that we need I 'm not saying that we don 't have one now. The thing is no one will ever be able to have the persuasion Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln and Slavery Many Americans believe that Abraham Lincoln was the “Great Emancipator,” the sole individual who ended slavery, and the man who epitomizes freedom. In his brief presidential term, Lincoln dealt with an unstable nation, with the South seceding from the country and in brink of leaving permanently.
It is common for Many historians and Americans to think as Lincoln as the president who fought for social equality, and freed all salves therefore believe he is entitle to to deserve the title of the great emancipator. There has been enough historical support that President Lincoln primary objective to fight in the American civil war (1861-1865) was not to fight to end slavery but fight to restore the union of the country. Abraham Lincoln was a great president during the civil war but whether or not he deserves the the titles of the great emancipator is another matter.
As one of America’s most prominent presidential figures, Abraham Lincoln is cemented in many people’s minds as the man who saved our country after a bloody civil war and eradicated the institution of slavery. While Lincoln was an extremely important figure in American history, there was also a man before this hero that all Americans know; there was a man concerned with the idea of social disruption and its threat to America during the mid-1800s.
As we advanced on to the next grade level, we were taught differently about Abraham Lincoln. We heard variety of stories growing up as we entered high school. Upon entering the classroom, he sat in the back listening to the students’ responses about the question, “What would Lincoln do?” They all similarly responded only positive actions and assumptions that Mr. Lincoln would undertake, but what about his flaws? Student that were unfamiliar about how bluntly racists Mr. Lincoln was felt kind of upset at the actuality that yes, our 16th president that freed the slaves was racists. Some African Americans that look up to Abraham Lincoln grew up calling him their “savior” until they hear the side of the story that is always kept away from the public fabricating them into feeling