As time changes so does the laws for the United States and a critical debate the supreme court has to face is if abolishing mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit serious degree murder is the right choice or not. Now in my perspective I agree with abolishing this system, juveniles have to face; which is receiving life sentences without parole. I believe these three reasons is what makes these young adolescents commit such serious high degree crimes; one can be due to their environment/raised, the tech/media a nd scientifically proven the brain is not fully developed between the ages that one is dissolving into a teenager. However, majority of supreme Court has decided to abolish mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit
murder,
…show more content…
Their actions are what clearly signifies the consequences they commit. Under the circumstances of growing up with one parent which in many cases the child does not receive the discipline they need to understand what’s is right or wrong. In other cases the child doesn't receive the needed treatment to confront their problems. They go through problems like bullying or cyberbullying, sometimes many get hypnotized on what they watch on tv. The difference between a teenager and an adult is that, adults have the capacity of understanding what's right or wrong. Many of them commit murder because they are angry at someone or are in some type of situation they can't find a way out of it. therefore, they commit murder know they will be sent to prison. On the other side teenagers act more on impulse when they argue among themselves and they commit these crimes because they think nothing will happen to them. I believe I am matured enough to understand what's right or wrong. Since I been disciplined and been given advice throughout my whole life by my family members. On not building up bad behavior especially to not take my anger take control of me. This is why I believe if a teenager is …show more content…
Fr om the articles in the modules that I have read in class these authors explain the importance of why young adolescents commit the crimes they do. Marjie Lundstrom in her article “Kids Are KidsUntil
They Commit Crimes” explains how the government is cruel and ignorant on the behavior of young adolescents commit. She argues if a kid is being trialed as an adult maybe they should lower the voting age to fourteen. Many kids eagerly like to do the opposite of what the parents tell them on what not do, but kids are curious and want to feel that sensation of how would it feel like. These are the kids that need that special treatment. Also she gives an example how tv programs can affects a kid life and actions. Affecting them in committing bad influential behavior things without knowing it was bad because they don't know the real consequences. Another author who I agree with is Paul thompson who is forward with abolishing the mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit murders, he also agrees that young adolescents don't commit murders just because they want to but because they go
Many people say that the systems first priority should be to protect the public from the juvenile criminals that are a danger to others. Once the juveniles enter the system there is however, arguments on what should be done with them. Especially for those deemed too dangerous to be released back to their parents. Some want them locked away for as long as possible without rehabilitation, thinking that it will halt their criminal actions. One way to do this they argue would be to send them into an adult court. This has been a large way to reform the juvenile system, by lowering the age limits. I believe in certain cases this is the best method for unforgiving juveniles convicted of murder, as in the case of Ronald Duncan, who got away with a much lesser sentence due to his age. However another juvenile, Geri Vance, was old enough to be sent into the adult court, which caused him t...
Maturity is not a fickle expression such as happiness or frustration, but rather an inherent quality one gains over time, such as courage or integrity. Before maturity can be expressed, the one who expresses it must have significant confidence in himself, since self-confidence is the root of maturity. Being flexible and formulating one's own opinions or ideas are aspects of maturity, but neither is possible without self-confidence. The greatest aspect of maturity is the ability to make decisions which society does not agree with. Whether or not one follows through with these ideas is not important. What is important is the ability to make the decision. These decisions represent the greatest measure of maturity.
In the article On Punishment and Teen Killers by Jenkins, sadly brings to our attention that kids are sometimes responsible for unimaginable crimes, in 1990 in a suburban Chicago neighborhood a teenager murdered a women, her husband, and her unborn child, as she begged for the life of her unborn child he shot her and later reported to a close friend that it was a “thrill kill”, that he just simply wanted to see what it felt like to shoot someone. A major recent issue being debated is whether or not we have the right to sentence Juveniles who commit heinous crimes to life in adult penitentiaries without parole. I strongly believe and agree with the law that states adolescents who commit these heinous crimes should be tried as adults and sentenced as adults, however I don’t believe they should be sentenced to life without parole. I chose this position because I believe that these young adults in no way should be excused for their actions and need to face the severe consequences of their actions. Although on the other hand I believe change is possible and that prison could be rehabilitating and that parole should be offered.
...who reflects on his or her own teenage years: Young teens lack the maturity, independence, and future orientation that adults have acquired” (Stevenson, 2014, p. 268). Bryan tries to explain this to the court as a way to prove that trying children as adults is unethical.
If a family member was murdered, a family member was murdered, age should not dictate if the punishment for homicide will be more lenient or not. If anyone not just juveniles has the capabilities to take someone's life and does so knowing the repercussions, they should be convicted as an adult. In the case of Jennifer Bishop Jenkins who lost her sister, the husband and their unborn child, is a strong advocate of juveniles being sentenced to life without parole. In her article “Jennifer Bishop Jenkins On Punishment and Teen Killers” she shows the world the other side of the spectrum, how it is to be the victim of a juvenile in a changing society where people are fighting against life sentences for juveniles. As she states in the article “There are no words adequate to describe what this kind of traumatic loss does to a victims family. So few who work on the juvenile offender side can truly understand what the victims of their crimes sometimes go through. Some never
Heinous crimes are considered brutal and common among adults who commit these crimes, but among children with a young age, it is something that is now being counted for an adult trial and punishable with life sentencing. Although some people agree with this decision being made by judges, It is my foremost belief that juveniles don’t deserve to be given life sentencing without being given a chance at rehabilitation. If this goes on there’s no point in even having a juvenile system if children are not being rehabilitated and just being sent off to prison for the rest of their lives and having no chance getting an education or future. Gail Garinger’s article “ juveniles Don’t deserve Life sentence”, written March 14, 2012 and published by New york Times, mentions that “ Nationwide, 79 adolescents have been sentenced to die in prison-a sentence not imposed on children anywhere else in the world. These children were told that they could never change and that no one cared what became of them. They were denied access to education and rehabilitation programs and left without help or hope”. I myself know what it’s like to be in a situation like that, and i also know that people are capable of changing even children when they are young and still growing.
Instead, these individuals are subjected to the structural violence of the system, and are largely given “life without possibility of parole” sentences. No matter how remorseful they are, how much they have learned, or how young and naive they were when the crime was committed, these individuals will never get the chance to live a different type of life.
Butler, Frank (2010) ‘Extinguishing All Hope: Life-Without-Parole for Juveniles’, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49: 4, 273-292
Fair sentencing of youth state's “Children sentenced to life in prison without parole are often the most vulnerable members of our society” The Gail Garinger article, “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences” discusses about children deserving a second opportunity. According to Garinger, children should receive a second chance and help so they could be mentally stable. According to Justice Elena Kagan she discusses that Juveniles without parole affects the way he develops throughout his life time. I agree with the majority decision that Juveniles should not be sentenced to life in prison and that they should be given a second chance because they deserve to fix their mistakes.
Some of the perpetrators are the caregivers to spouses who are chronically ill. Another involves marriage, lovers who have lived together for many years. The main question, which remains unanswered is “why can some wake up one morning and decide to take away another person’s life”. According to Chermack & Taylor (1995), most of the perpetrators are usually mentally ill and challenged with extreme psychological problems. They may be suffering from strong stress and depressive disorder that affects their perception and feelings towards life. Although these people face blame for their undesirable actions, it is beneficial to make an effort to understand their problem (Kaukinen, 2002). Solving their alarming problem would significantly reduce the crime rates in the society and encourage the realization of a better environment.
In the eyes of those who are for the death penalty, they believe that the criminal
- lack of communication by parent can cause child to be defensive and reject their responsibilities
How can a word our society uses so much have such a loose definition. Teacher’s and parents refer to their children as mature or immature. But maybe one teacher’s definition of maturity is the child, —or adult, can press on while a fellow student is in trouble, to ensure he himself does well. While another’s definition is that the child expressed maturity for stopping and helping the other child in his decisions to avoid trouble. A common idea is that to show maturity one must weigh out all the possible outcomes and then ...
Discipline is a skill used to impart knowledge or to teach. There is a controversy between disciplining and punishing children based on ways involved and limits used. Canadian Pediatric Society recommends taking an anticipatory approach to discipline (Nieman & Shea, 2004, para 4). Parents should be asking questions based on the techniques that can be used at home to teach children. Control is recommended for children because it assists in changing behaviors, it is both temperamentally and developmentally appropriate, it is a form of self-enhancing, and it is always given by an adult who has a direct bond with the child.
Children grow up and move into teenage lifestyles, involvement with their peers, and how they look in other peoples eyes start to matter. Their hormones kick in, and they experience rapid changes in their minds, and bodies. They also develop a mind of their own, questioning the adult standards and need for their parental guidance. By trying new values and testing ideas with peers there is less of a chance of being criticized. Even though peer pressure can have positive effects, the most part is the bad part.