Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Juvenile should be sentence as adults
Criminal juvenile justice system
Criminal juvenile justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Juvenile should be sentence as adults
• Michael Gulley (15), Nathan McCants (17), and Joe Sullivan (13) break in the empty house of Lena Bruner. Michael takes money and some of Ms. Burner’s possessions. • Later that afternoon, the elderly Ms. Bruner is raped and is unable to clearly describe her abuser. All she knew was that it was a dark colored boy with curly hair. Michael Gulley, Nathan McCants, and Joe Sullivan are all African American. • Nathan accuses Joe of sexual assault in order to save himself. Joe is not apprehended that day but he voluntarily turns himself in the next day. He admits to helping in the burglary but denies any knowledge or involvement in the sexual assault. • Joe is tried as an adult at only thirteen years old. • Michael and Nathan make up all of these lies about Joe and convince the court that he did in fact rape Ms. Bruner, when this was not the case. Michael and Nathan were lying to save themselves. • Nathan is sentenced as an adult to four-and-one-half years and serves just six months. • Michael has a criminal history and somehow he is tried as a juvenile and only spends a short period of time in juvenile detention. • They had semen and blood samples that they did not test and someone witnessed a glimpse of a black male running from Ms. Burner’s house after she was raped. Yet, no one makes use or pays adequate attention to this evidence, probably because it would prove Joe innocent. • Ms. Bruner is even hesitant towards naming Joe as her offender. Nothing is done properly throughout this entire case. • No one gives Joe a fair trial, he thought he did the right thing by turning himself in, however, he sent himself to jail. Based off of his background and the need to arrest someone, Joe was an easy target. • He is sentenced to life i... ... middle of paper ... ...who reflects on his or her own teenage years: Young teens lack the maturity, independence, and future orientation that adults have acquired” (Stevenson, 2014, p. 268). Bryan tries to explain this to the court as a way to prove that trying children as adults is unethical. • “More than 2,500 children in the United States had been sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. Most juveniles sentenced to life imprisonment without parole had been convicted of homicide crimes. We estimated there were fewer than two hundred juveniles serving life without parole for non-homicide offenses” (Stevenson, 2014, pp. 269-270). • Bryan goes to the U.S. Supreme Court to discuss these issues. Nothing is decided or determined during this chapter. • After speaking to the U.S. Supreme Court, Bryan visits Joe and catches up with him. As always, Joe is eager to have someone to take to.
Nesbitt and the robbery. “The states prosecute most crimes against the person, such as murders , assaults and many crimes against property, such as robberies and theft”(https://www.oas.org/juridico/mla/en/usa/en_usa-int-desc-guide.html). You can be prosecuted in any state for robberies and murders just like what Steve Harmon is put on trial for in the book. As previously mentioned this show that in any state you will be put on trial for robbery and murder. “Therefore, the role of judges in the investigation of criminal offenses is limited”(https://www.oas.org/juridico/mla/en/usa/en_usa-int-desc-guide.html) . They are just saying that judges don't really have any say whenever it comes to the investigation of criminal offenses but they do some extent. Judging by Steven Harmon’s case he is seen as just a young black man of trial for being an accessory to a murder and robbery that’s all the jury needs to know right? But that’s note true they need to look at all the facts of the case and all the facts tell you that Steve Harmon did in fact take part in the murder of Mr. Nesbitt and the robbery of his drug
Juveniles don’t deserve life sentences without parole for many reasons but one main reason is becase people don’t know a person’s life at home and sometimes living in a broken home can affect their social life. According to the article “Greg Ousley Is Sorry for Killing His Parents”, the author Scott Anderson states that,“The only way to unlock the mysteries of the psyche is to dissect your childhood, especially the formative influence of your parents” (Anderson 56), proving that juveniles are easily influenced to do terrifying crimes and is not their fault because no one was there to guide them.
While he is in jail, he is writing a script for a movie about the trial. The script helps Steve stay calm and not go crazy while he is in jail. Steve and his Defense Attorney, Kathy O’Brien, are trying to prove to the jury that Steve is innocent. Steve is thought to have been working with two other men, James King and Richard “Bobo” Evans. These two people robbed the store and then Steve apparently killed the owner of the store after Bobo and King left.
They sent Burke to bed making sure he would go along with their story and he
In the article On Punishment and Teen Killers by Jenkins, sadly brings to our attention that kids are sometimes responsible for unimaginable crimes, in 1990 in a suburban Chicago neighborhood a teenager murdered a women, her husband, and her unborn child, as she begged for the life of her unborn child he shot her and later reported to a close friend that it was a “thrill kill”, that he just simply wanted to see what it felt like to shoot someone. A major recent issue being debated is whether or not we have the right to sentence Juveniles who commit heinous crimes to life in adult penitentiaries without parole. I strongly believe and agree with the law that states adolescents who commit these heinous crimes should be tried as adults and sentenced as adults, however I don’t believe they should be sentenced to life without parole. I chose this position because I believe that these young adults in no way should be excused for their actions and need to face the severe consequences of their actions. Although on the other hand I believe change is possible and that prison could be rehabilitating and that parole should be offered.
Friday April 24th J.P. Walker, Preacher Lee, Crip Reyer, L.C. Davis got into Reyer’s Oldsmobile and took off on a mission to kill Mark Charles Parker. Three other cars of men followed, they went to the courthouse/jail in Poplarville and they could not get in. So they went to Jewel Alford’s House (the jail keeper) to get the keys to the jail. Alford went with the four men to the courthouse.
When he goes to the Round House, Joe brings his friends Cappy, Angus, and Zack to see if they can find any evidence the police may not have found. Before his friends arrive, Joe thinks through the crime and is able to find the gas can that the attacker left behind. Joe swims out into the lake and is able to find the gas can, which is “evidence” he brings home to his father. There is also a cooler of beer and a set of old stained clothes he brings to his father’s attention and to the
y of their actions.To demonstrate this assertion is correct, sufficient research has been complied.To prove in the article, On Punishment and Teen Killers, by Jennifer Jenkins has stated that,”We in America have to own this particular problem, with weapons so easily available to our youth, and the violence-loving culture in which we raise them”(5).Although it 's not us who commit the crime we do make it easier for them to get a hold on weapons espicially in the Unites States.Adam Liptak points out in the article, Jailed for Life After Crimes as Teenagers, that “The United States is one of only a handful of countries that does that.Life without parole, the most severe form of life sentences,is theoretically available for
Michael soon decides that if he can trust Joe enough to keep in silence, he may be able to out wit the police. When Michael makes his decision, he never considers the ramifications that will come of it. For example, Michael never even considers the long agonizing nights he will stay awake or the ling pain filled days he will go through thinking of Jenna Ward and her mother suffering day after day. On the contrary, Michael thinks he will be able to just move on and forget about it.
The sentencing of underage criminals has remained a logistical and moral issue in the world for a very long time. The issue is brought to our perspective in the documentary Making a Murderer and the audio podcast Serial. When trying to overcome this issue, we ask ourselves, “When should juveniles receive life sentences?” or “Should young inmates be housed with adults?” or “Was the Supreme Court right to make it illegal to sentence a minor to death?”. There are multiple answers to these questions, and it’s necessary to either take a moral or logical approach to the problem.
Heinous crimes are considered brutal and common among adults who commit these crimes, but among children with a young age, it is something that is now being counted for an adult trial and punishable with life sentencing. Although some people agree with this decision being made by judges, It is my foremost belief that juveniles don’t deserve to be given life sentencing without being given a chance at rehabilitation. If this goes on there’s no point in even having a juvenile system if children are not being rehabilitated and just being sent off to prison for the rest of their lives and having no chance getting an education or future. Gail Garinger’s article “ juveniles Don’t deserve Life sentence”, written March 14, 2012 and published by New york Times, mentions that “ Nationwide, 79 adolescents have been sentenced to die in prison-a sentence not imposed on children anywhere else in the world. These children were told that they could never change and that no one cared what became of them. They were denied access to education and rehabilitation programs and left without help or hope”. I myself know what it’s like to be in a situation like that, and i also know that people are capable of changing even children when they are young and still growing.
Butler, Frank (2010) ‘Extinguishing All Hope: Life-Without-Parole for Juveniles’, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49: 4, 273-292
However, this was not what took place. Heather and her mother went to court and was told byaprobation officer that there was no need for a lawyer because the maximum sentence would be probation and community service. She had to sign a paper stating that they did not have a lawyer. When they entered the court room theywere in front of Judge Ciavarella. He referred to her as an adjudicated delinquent and she was then handcuffed and sent to juvenile detention.The series then includes an interview with Charlie who was also sent to juvenile detention for officers assuming he had received stolen property, even though his family
As the prosecutor creates a strong argument that makes it sound like he is guilty of this murder. With the strong argument toward Steve the attorneys also have a stronger argument towards the state. As Steve takes the witness stand he gives a look toward the jury that looks suspicious. Other criminals were to take the witness stand but they only did it because it meant that they could get a shorter sentence time. After the trial Steve was found not guilty to the jury and he could go
...t I do not think that the evidence presented is enough for a conviction to sentence any man or woman to death.