Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of the supreme court on civil rights
Impact of the supreme court on civil rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of the supreme court on civil rights
Supreme Court Paper Rough Draft Ben On January 10th The United States Supreme Court accepted eight different cases, among these was the much-awaited case of ABC Inc. v. Aereo Inc. The Supreme Court will resolve the tempestuous conflict between some of The United States largest broadcast television networks including ABC, CBS, PBS, Fox, NBC, and a startup called Aereo. Aereo provides customers with access to broadcast television online without paying retransmission fees to the broadcasting networks. The decision of the case will have many implications, the case will decide the future of the television business, and how people access broadcast television. Television networks are allowed to transmit their content over public airwaves with the condition that the content is free to the public. The startup Aereo takes advantage of this, and leases small antennas to each subscriber, these antennas are used by Aereo to access the aforementioned public airwaves, and stream the signals directly to their customers electronic devices. Usually cable, and satellite companies pay retransmission fees to carry the broadcaster's content, Aereo does not and the broadcasting companies believe Aereo’s retransmission of their signals is illegal. Aereo has interpreted these laws differently, and because of the way they have organized their service they believe they do not have to pay retransmission fees. They believe they are assisting the action of accessing the public airwaves in a way their customers can already access legally. The broadcasting networks argue when Aereo provides their customers with the broadcasters copyright material Aereo is violating the Copyright Act as well. Under the Copyright Act you are not prohibited from showing copyright ... ... middle of paper ... ...ugh, Justice Alito recused himself from the deciding whether or not to accept the case, this implies Justice Alito may not participate in the decision, and the court could be divided. Bibliography Denniston, Lyle. "Court Grants Eight Cases." scotusblog.com. Scotusblog, January 10, 2014. Web. January 15, 2014. Liptak and Carter, Adam and Bill. "Justices Take Case on Free TV." nytimes.com. The New York Times, January 10, 2014. Web. January 15, 2014. Phillips, Michael. "A Start-up, the Supreme Court, and the Future of TV." newyorker.com. The New Yorker, January 15, 2014. Web. January 15, 2014. Johnson, Ted. "Supreme Court to Hear Aereo Case." variety.com. Variety.com, January 10, 2014. Web. January 15, 2014. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. "Supreme Court to Hear Aereo Case." bloomberglaw.com. bloomberglaw.com, August 4, 2004. Web. January 15, 2014.
Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
al., Appellants v. City of New York et al. Supreme Court of the United States. U.S. 1998. Web. 6 May 2014.
"Summary of the Decision." Landmark Cases Of The U.S Supreme Court. Street Law, Inc, n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2013. .
“NEW YORK TIMES v. UNITED STATES.” The Oyez Project. llT Chicago-Kent College Of Law, n.d. Web. 5 Dec. 2013.
"Key Supreme Court Cases: Schenck v. United States - American Bar ..." 2011. 14 Jan. 2014
Brannen Jr., Daniel E., Richard Clay Hare and Rebeca E. Valentine, Supreme Court Drama: Cases that Changed America. 2 ed. Detroit: V-X-L, 2011, Print,
Remy, Richard C., Gary E. Clayton, and John J. Patrick. "Supreme Court Cases." Civics Today. Columbus, Ohio: Glencoe, 2008. 796. Print.
The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. (2014, May 3). MGM Studios v. Grokster. Retrieved from http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_04_480
O' Connor, Sandra D. "Boos v. Barry." 22 March 1988. World Wide Web. 3 March 2001.
Smolowe, JillWillwerth, James. "Waiting For The Verdicts." Time 142.26 (1993): 48. MAS Ultra - School Edition.
Holmes Jr, Oiver Wendle. United States. Supreme Court. 274 U.S. 200, at 207. 1927. Print.
Citation: Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S 397, 109 S. Ct. 2533, 105 L. Ed. 2d 342, 1989
5. Harrison, Maureen. Gilbert, Steve. Landmark Decisions of the United States Supreme Court II. La Jolla, California. Copyright 1992. By Excellent Books.
"Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court." Key Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Feb. 2014.
"Romer v. Evans." West's Encyclopedia of American Law. 2005. Retrieved February 21, 2011 from Encyclopedia.com: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3437703853.html