A Theory Of Justice John Rawls Summary

1081 Words3 Pages

John Rawls is the philosopher who came up with many theories of philosophy during a long time. One of his main works of arts was a book he wrote, A theory of Justice. This book contains his ideas in which the society would be fair and where the people inside the society would benefit as a whole the most they potentially would be able too.
During the book he talks a lot about having a well organized society in order for everything to flow out correctly. Everyone within the society need to accept and know that there are other people just as important as they within the society. This means that they need to accept the same principles of justice as everyone else in order to reach some type of equilibrium among each other. This is hard to happen …show more content…

The first one would give each person the equal right to be the most extensive basic liberty. This liberty would also then naturally be compatible with a similar liberty for others in a society. This first principle has logical priority over the second one. The second principle would try to make social and economic inequalities as leveled as possible. In order to give everyone the same reasonable advantage of others. This idea ultimately attaches a fair try at positions in offices as well as other ones inside a group. In order to create a well organized society where everyone's satisfaction is as high as possible basic structures are to be added to a society. Securing and giving equal liberties of citizenship would give the normal civilizan the political rights and liberties that they need in every day of life. The second essential need of people within a society is to establish a social and economic inequalities. This would result in a distribution of income, wealth, opportunities, and the bases of self respect would be dispersed equally among everyone unless an unequal talent of any, or all of these values would be to everyone’s advantage in the time that it is needed. An example of this would be if a group of people want to go somewhere, but the place is pretty far walking, so they choose to use a car instead of walking. No one besides one person knows how to drive. This person would ideally be given an …show more content…

The veil of ignorance means to not know how specific deliberations will affect ones over a particular case and being obliged to evaluate evaluate principles solely on the basis of the general considerations. These people characterize things into two groups. Things that they do not know and are ignored, and things that they must know. Things that they often ignore consist of class positions, social statuses, distribution of goods, and natural assets and abilities. Things within the veil of ignorance that usually known are basic features of human social life, understanding political affairs, principles of economic theories, philosophy, and social organizations. The people incharge of taking a stand on the original position then often use these as a guide to make decisions on new laws and other necessities of a

Open Document