Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How individual members of a team can affect team dynamics
How individual members of a team can affect team dynamics
Creating and leading an effective team
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This essay will aim to explore the underlying causes of the key problems and symptoms of problems encountered by the ‘A team’ through the use of empirical research and Organisational Behaviour theories and models. It was identified through an in depth analysis into high performing work teams that the underlying causes of the ‘A teams’ struggles were a direct result of three areas which included: A) an almost non existent level of group development B) an inability of the group members to work effectively with one another and C) poor group dynamics. In response to these underlying causes this essay through the use of relevant recommendations endeavors to outline how the issues and problems experienced could have been avoided or corrected.
Firstly this essay will examine the reasons behind the initial group development being a key cause in the lacklustre performance of the group. According to Tuckman & Jensen (1977) there are four main stages in team development which include Performing, Norming, Storming and Forming. It was in the Performing stage that problems began to surface for the group. Initially it was Scott who began to lead the group through shear dominance. However, a subsection of the group did not fully trust Scott as they deemed his ideas to be problematic. They could only bestow ‘calculus based’ trust upon him which is the lowest level of trust anyone can have. It symbolizes a logical assumption that a group member will act in a suitable manner as otherwise they face punishment if their actions violate reasonable expectations (McAllister 1995). This was due to the fact that the group believed the ideas he put forward were problematic. Despite the fact that Sara and Hamish were concerned with the approach Scott sugge...
... middle of paper ...
...am to ensure that simple mistakes such as not utilizing goal setting and having low levels of group cohesion are repeated.
In conclusion there were a number of underlying factors which contributed to the poor performance of the ‘A Team’. Within the causes of group development, group effectiveness and group dynamics there were a number of problems outlined. Initially when the team came together there were a number of costly mistakes made which meant that the team was never going to be able to maximize its potential. Fundamentally the poor performance of the group was due to the fact that the direction and approach the group would take could not be clearly outlined to other members as a result of a lack of communication. The dynamics of the group also played a major part in the unsatisfactory performance largely because social loafing was present amongst members.
Interprofessional teams in health care are considered to be one of the best approaches to improve patient outcomes. Interprofessional teams provide the means to integrate patient care with input from many different professional disciplines (Rose, 2011). Nurses are an important part of the interprofessional team, since they are often the team member that is closest to the patient (Miers & Pollard, 2009). I recently participated in a team that developed a work flow for daily readmission rounds. The team was interprofessional, the hospitalist, who was an APRN led the team. There was the case manager and the primary nurse who were both RN’s. The team also consisted of a resident, pharmacist, nutritionist, physical therapist, and social worker.
The purpose of this paper is to give a review of the book, The Five Dysfunctions of a Team by author, Patrick Lencioni and provide teams and team members with a sense of the strengths and weaknesses that can be used to make or break teams in certain areas. The following will give you a summary of Patrick Lencioni’s teamwork model and how it can be a road map for your team and your leadership skills.
The Everest team simulation was a valuable experience that taught me how to apply the foundations of the management course into real and first-hand team situations. The success of a team and their performance depends on their initial stage of development as well as their structure. A team with an established team structure and maturity over the different stages of group development proved to be extremely successful. The decision making and conflict resolution techniques were also influential in the overall performance of a team. Ultimately, effective communication is the key to success when working in a team. On the other hand, ineffective communication may be the team’s downfall. The simulation exercise was a solid example towards work group situations and is a valuable first-hand experience.
The group has reached the Norming stage when they begin the second stage. “The team is faced with creating cohesion and unity, differentiating roles, identifying expectation for members, and enhancing commitment. Providing supportive feedback and fostering commitment to a vision are ne...
Effective teams must be developed, not just formed. A group is not a team. Members of a group may sometimes work together, but members of a team always work together. The team need not all be in the same place to be working together. “With a group, the whole is often equal to or less than the sum of its parts; with a team, the whole is always greater” (Oakley, Brent, Felder and Elhajj, 2004). A team, as defined above, has certain characteristics that make it effective. Not all of these traits are present when a team is in the forming stage. Tea...
In this paper, I will identify and describe a group I recently observed. The description will include information about the group process and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the leader’s style. I will also consider what I might do differently if leading the group and think about how I could apply what I learned from this observation into my own work.
Seven tasks must be included in consideration of team dynamics and structure. The first of which is defining the goal, mission or function of a specific team. The team must know what it is being asked to accomplish. The second area of consideration is assessing what skills, abilities, knowledge or potential to acquire such would be needed amongst selected team members. Identification of potential team members should include an assessment of the skills, knowledge and abilities or the potential to acquire such so that ultimately the team has the building blocks with which to succeed in its mission, goal or function. This assessment must include an understanding of realistic potential contributions by potential team members with the included assessment of whether or not the acquisition of skills and knowledge can be made available through research and analysis.
It is proven that teams who work well together perform and have a higher rate of success compared to teams who do not work well together or communicate with each other. A recent article with regards to leadership discussed the topic of group cohesion and how this is a factor for success. The article discussed several situations, one about a business company, one about a sports team and one about a military operation. The article closely analyzed the leaders of the three situations and discussed the similarities and differences between the three. The main similarity between was there focus on cohesion. The article contained facts about how the business was operating and how that in recent years, production and sales as increased drastically, and one factor for this increase was the CEO implemented a mandatory team building exercise each
When first being introduced to a group, it can be quite stressful trying to figure out how you and your team members are going to function together. As with any group, there are a few milestones that need to be reached in order to ensure a functional and successful relationship. Specifically, groups need to go through Tuckman’s Group Development Stages. These stages consist of forming, storming, norming, performing, and in some scenarios, a final stage of adjourning may be reached. After participating in this assignment, we as a group were easily able to identify, and analyze, each stage of our development.
In order for a work place to be successful and beneficial to everyone involve in the company, teams needs to be form, and each team must have a goal in mind. Employees must come together to accomplish a common goal. Teamwork will not only benefit those involve in the project but it will also have a huge impact in your business.
When we think of the word team, individually many different ideas may come to mind about what a team really is. Some may think of an NFL team (Tennessee Titans), an NBA team (Sacramento Kings), or a NASA astronaut team with such pioneers as Edwin Aldrin, Jr. and Neil Armstrong as members. You might even think of the U.S. Navy, Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, or Marines as teams. In fact they all are, and they have a great deal in common as teams. However, for the purposes of this paper I will examine the characteristics of work teams, as they apply to organizations and I will supply answers to the following questions: What is a team? Where did the team concept come from? What are the types of teams? What are the advantages and disadvantages of having teams in organizations? What does it take to make a team effective?
Abstract In the book “Five Dysfunctions of a Team”, the author describes the pitfalls that teams may face as they work together. The book looks at some of the underlying reasons that teams fail. The book is considered a motivational fable that is a fictional story that shares a moral or ethical lesson. Those lessons are intended to be used in the organizations to improve or transform its overall culture.
The four main barriers are poor communication, an unclear common objective, conflicting attitudes, priorities and values, and the lack of equal responsibility amongst the team.
Realizing that a group can become a high performance team is important. Accomplishing this goal is invaluable, advantageous and profitable. Once able to operate from a group to the high performing team is a great step into preparation into the big business world. Leaders and members must also realize not only how to accomplish this but that some problems will and can arise from different demographic characteristics and cultural diversity. That is if one is in such a group, which the probability would be quite high.
Companies that have been successful in organizing hi performing teams have reaped the benefits of having appropriate team cohesiveness. However, contrary for companies that have tried and failed at the everchanging task of keeping the lines of communication open between employees and leaders to reach a final product. It is not wise for a leader to place emphasis on team member relationships alone, but more importantly on problem solving techniques and motivating each individual and the team as a whole. Organizations that have set out to improve the quality of the products and business structu...