Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A streetcar named desire characters and contrasting values
A streetcar named desire perception
A streetcar named desire characters and contrasting values
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In this passage, Williams’ emphasises the nature of Blanche’s demise through the contrapuntal mode of the scene juxtaposing Blanche’s bathing with Stanley and Stella’s conversation. Williams wrote in a letter to Elia Kazan, who was to direct the film production of the play, that ‘It is a thing (misunderstanding) not a person (Stanley) that destroys (Blanche) in the ends’. This passage is significant as it shows the extent of Stanley’s misunderstanding of Blanche and his stubbornness to ascertain his condemnations to Stella. Furthermore, the use of colloquial lexis shows the true feebleness of Stanley’s claim because his judicial façade is diminished and shows the dangerous influence of claims as he sways Mitch away from Blanche. Stella’s character …show more content…
Blanche is heard singing ‘It’s a Barnum and Bailey world, Just a phony as it can be—’. ‘Barnum’, is an exophoric reference to the Barnum effect, from entertainer P. T. Barnum—a notorious hoaxer, that meant to accept vague information. In addition, by using the word ‘phony’ the concept of half-truth, hoaxes and deceit, foreshadowing to her fate to people’s belief in half-truths, is further emphasised by Williams. Therefore, Blanche’s jovial singing is dramatic irony and temporal prolepsis to her fate as it reflects Stanley’s actions and the events in scene IX with Mitch. William’s conveys that this is the most likely cause of misunderstanding through Stanley’s use of colloquial lexis like the monosyllabic ‘Boy, oh, boy’ and by purposely misspelling practically when he says confidently that ‘Yep it was practickly a town ordinance’ and uses a declarative statement to convey his certainty on something that in truth is far from certain. By doing this, Williams emphasises the uneducated nature of Stanley to the audience, and implies that his claim may not actually be that true. The plosive repetition of, ‘Boy’, in, ‘Boy, oh, Boy!’, is used to emphasise his enthusiasm for the downfall of Blanche and conveys the immaturity of Stanley to the audience. Furthermore, Stanley’s malice towards Blanche is highlighted by his use of the semantic field of fishing when he exclaims that he’d ‘like to have seen her trying to squirm out of that one! But they had her on the hook good’ with the zoomorphic use of ‘squirm’ to characterise Blanche as the
McGlinn addresses the third dialectic taking hold of Blanche: illusion versus reality. McGlinn points out that, like all the women in Williams’s plays between 1940 and 1950, Blanche “refuses to accept the reality of her life and attempts to live under illusion.” [Tharpe, 513]. Although McGlinn is accurate in noting Blanche’s conflict between gentility and promiscuity, the result of which is “self-defeat instead of survival” [Tharpe, 513], she fails to see that Blanche lives in both illusion and reality simultaneously, and it is this dialectic that is the slow poison which destroys her. This death-instinct gives us the fourth and last dialectic in Blanche: her struggle between death and desire.”
6). Williams’s sister Rose is the real-life parallel of Blanche – Blanche’s illusions about life mirror Rose’s after her forced lobotomy*. However, unlike Rose Blanche is presented as knwing that she is “on the verge of - lunacy” (p.7). Similarly, Williams declared that after the events of ‘A Streetcar Named Desire’, Blanche left the asylum and lived a fulfilling life with a young gentleman – he was perhaps deluding himself, pushing his hopes for Rose onto Blanche, the fictional character believed to have been inspired by his
As Stanley continues torturing Blanche and draws Stella and Mitch away from her, Blanche’s sanity slowly dwindles. Even though she lied throughout the play, her dishonesty becomes more noticeable and irrational due to Stanley's torment about her horrible past. After dealing with the deaths of her whole family, she loses Belle Reve, the estate on which her and her sister grew up. This is too much for Blanche to handle causing her moral vision to be blurred by “her desperate need to be with someone, with ancestors for models who indulged in “epic fornications” with impunity, [Blanche] moves through the world filling the void in her life with lust” (Kataria 2). She also loses a young husband who killed himself after she found out he was gay when she caught him with another man. After that traumatic experience she needed “a cosy nook to squirm herself into because ...
The underlying theme of the play is desire, and the way that Stanley and Blanche deal with their desires is one of the biggest differences between them. Stanley embraces all of his desires in a somewhat animalistic way. When he eats, he gets food all over himself. He has many vices, including drinking, smoking, and gambling. He has a very bad temper, and when he wants something he will take it. He is not shy about his sex life, and does not even try and act modest around Blanche or his friends. All of these qualities come together and are best exemplified in scene 3 of the play, when Stanley is with his friends, drinking, smoking, and playing poker. The stage directions say “STANLEY gives a loud whack of his hand on her thigh” (Williams 110). From that, it is clear to see that Stanley believes that he controls Stella and has little regard for her feelings, because after he smacks her, stella says “Thats not fun, Stanley…It makes me so mad when he does that in front of people” (Williams 110). Blanche, on the other hand, tries her very best to mask her desire. She cares a great deal about her outer appearance, and makes sure that she is always presentable. She is constantly lying about how much she drinks, trying to hide the fact that she might have a problem. She often pretends she has no idea where the liquor is hidden, even though the reader (or the audience watching the play) knows that she found it soon after arriving in New
During early times men were regarded as superior to women. In Tennessee William’s play, “A Streetcar Named Desire”, Stanley Kowalski, the work’s imposing antagonist, thrives on power. He embodies the traits found in a world of old fashioned ideals where men were meant to be dominant figures. This is evident in Stanley’s relationship with Stella, his behavior towards Blanche, and his attitude towards women in general. He enjoys judging women and playing with their feelings as well.
Within Tennessee Williams's story about love and abuse within marriage and challenging familial ties, there lie three very different characters that all see the world in vastly different ways. These members of a family that operate completely outside of our generation’s norms, are constantly unsure of themselves and their station within the binary not only of their familial unit, but within the gender binary that is established for them to follow. Throughout the story of the strange family, each character goes through a different arch that changes them irrevocably whether it is able to be perceived or not by those around them. The only male, Stanley is initially the macho force in the home who controls everything without question. He has no consequences for his actions against his wife and is never held accountable for treating the people around him poorly; this lasts until Blanche arrives. Blanche is an outwardly demure, but spirited young woman who after experiencing untold misfortune breaks mentally and decides to no longer care what others may think of her. She lives her life lavishly and foolishly by having dalliances with younger or richer men who shower her with gifts and attention to get sex from her all too willing form. Her effect on Stanley is one of temptation and challenge; she continually tries to convince her sister that she is too good for the man and in turn fosters a resentment for her in him. Stella acts as the antithesis of Stanley and Blanche’s extreme personalities. She is innocence and purity where they are the darkness that threatens to overtake her life. Throughout, Stella is a pawn that they both try to use against the other to no real avail as she is determined to make the best choice for herself. In th...
In Tennessee Williams' play, A Streetcar Named Desire, Williams uses the suicide of Blanche's husband to illuminate Blanche's insecurities and immoral behavior. When something terrible happens to someone, it often reveals who he or she truly is. Blanche falls victim to this behavior, and she fails to face her demons. This displays how the play links a character’s illogical choices and their inner struggles.
A Streetcar Named Desire is a play founded on the premise of conflicting cultures. Blanche and Stanley, the main antagonists of the play, have been brought up to harbour and preserve extremely disparate notions, to such an extent that their incompatibility becomes a recurring theme within the story. Indeed, their differing values and principles becomes the ultimate cause of antagonism, as it is their conflicting views that fuels the tension already brewing within the Kowalski household. Blanche, a woman disillusioned with the passing of youth and the dejection that loneliness inflicts upon its unwilling victims, breezes into her sister's modest home with the air and grace of a woman imbued with insecurity and abandonment. Her disapproval, concerning Stella's state of residence, is contrived in the face of a culture that disagrees with the old-fashioned principles of the southern plantations, a place that socialised Blanche to behave with the superior demeanour of a woman brain-washed into right-wing conservatism. Incomparably, she represents the old-world of the south, whilst Stanley is the face of a technology driven, machine fuelled, urbanised new-world that is erected on the foundations of immigration and cultural diversity. New Orleans provides such a setting for the play, emphasising the bygone attitude of Blanche whose refusal to part with the archaic morals of her past simply reiterates her lack of social awareness. In stark contrast Stanley epitomises the urban grit of modern society, revealed by his poker nights, primitive tendencies and resentment towards Blanche. ...
This hotel is thought to be a popular spot to have extra curricular activities. In other words she was there to be a prostitute. Stanley calls her out and states “This is after the home-place had slipped through her lily white fingers! She moved to the Flamingo!” (Williams 99). Stanley divulged that Blanche was living at the Flamingo Hotel and Blanche immediately comes back and rejects to this and uttered “It’s Barnum and Bailey world, Just as phony as it can be- But it would not be make-believe if you believed in me!” (William 99). She is denying everything even though Stanley has cold hard evidence. Blanche is digging herself a deeper and deeper grave that will soon catch up to her. Stanley now keeps on her case and continues with all the lies he knows about. Subsequently, Stanley rant rages on as Blanche just keeps trying to deceive everyone. Stanley goes on with his second point stating “Which brings us to lie number two, She’s not going back to teach school! In fact I am willing to bet you that she never had no idea of returning to Laurel” (William 100). Stanley is correctly prosecuting Blanche of getting kicked out of highschool for “getting mixed up
Stanley is, at first sought to be a dominant, rough individual but William’s use of stage direction implies an opposing thought. For example, Williams describes Blanche’s bed near the bedroom of Stella and Stanley’s, but what is so vital about the position of the bed readers may question. Conclusively, Stanley’s...
A Streetcar Named Desire is a play of multifaceted themes and diverse characters with the main antagonists of the play, Blanche and Stanley infused by their polarized attitudes towards reality and society ‘structured on the basis of the oppositions past/present and paradise lost/present chaos’(*1). The effect of these conflicting views is the mental deterioration of Blanche’s cerebral health that, it has been said; Stanley an insensitive brute destroyed Blanche with cruel relish and is the architect of her tragic end. However, due to various events in the play this statement is open to question, for instance, the word ‘insensitive’ is debatable, ‘insensitive’ can be defined as not thinking of other people’s feelings but Stanley is aware of what he’s doing understanding the mental impairment he causes Blanche.
Blanche uses her fantasies as a shield; and her desires as her motivation to survive. Her fading beauty being her only asset and chance of finding stability. Stella’s relationship with Stanley also emphasis the theme Williams created in this book. They’re only bond is physical desire and nothing at all intellectual or deep rooted. Tennessee Williams exemplifies that their relationship which only springs from desire doesn’t make it any weaker. He also creates a social dichotomy of the relationship between death and desire.
(Williams 162). Stanley’s alleged rape finally pushes Blanche over the edge, especially when Stella does not believe Blanche’s claim. Stanley finally defeats Blanche with this persistent realism when he physically exerts it onto Blanche; making it impossible for her to not admit the truth. In the last scene of the play,
One of the first major themes of this book is the constant battle between fantasy and reality. Blanche explains to Mitch that she fibs because she refuses to accept the hand fate has dealt her. Lying to herself and to others allows her to make life appear as it should be rather than as it is. Stanley, a practical man firmly grounded in the physical world, disdains Blanche’s fabrications and does everything he can to unravel them. The relationship between Blanche and Stanley is a struggle between appearances and reality. It propels the play’s plot and creates an overarching tension. Ultimately, Blanche’s attempts to rejuvenate her life and to save Stella from a life with Stanley fail. One of the main ways the author dramatizes fantasy’s inability to overcome reality is through an explorati...
The audience can sense that Williams has intended Stanley to question Blanche and for her to simply return his remarks with what seem like legitimate reasons "Why, those were a tribute from an admirer of mine." The conflict can only be increased because Stanley has not yet been able to dismantle Blanche and find the truth.