A Sound Of Thunder Vs Nethergrave Essay

699 Words2 Pages

Bradbury’s “A Sound of Thunder” and Skurzynski’s “Nethergrave” are both good science fiction stories. Both stories have their pros and cons like everything else. The focus of these stories is how technology can affect us in such a dramatic way and can change the world we live in. In this essay, the two previously mentioned stories will be compared and contrasted. Bradbury’s story is more fascinating than Skurzynskis story. Bradbury’s idea that the scarcest thing in the past might colossally change the future bringing on a chain-response in the book can be a captivating. This story no doubt makes the reader more intrigued by Bradbury’s idea and longing that the story had gone on longer. In the story, Eckels utilizes a company’s new creation, a time machine, to backpedal to a period when dinosaurs lived. While there, he makes a little botch that incited critical results. Eckels demise at last makes the reader feel thoughtful towards his character. Every individual has felt disgrace and …show more content…

It was more intriguing and relatable than Skurzynskis story. Just as rolling out improvements in the past can change the present and future the decisions, we make each day shape the future. Every choice we make and each move we make produces a radical new world and a radical new course of events in the matter of what happens. Similar to how Eckels activities change his present time, all that we do change not only the future but rather the lives of everybody around us. Oftentimes we are unconscious of how our choices and activities will influence our future. Some choices we make can have horrible outcomes, for example, driving while affected by liquor. Unlike Bradbury’s story, we don't generally know how our choices will influence the future. We are unmindful of what will leave every single activity we make. The final products are frequently obscure and unusual until the impacts cause an interruption in our lives and we pay

Open Document