Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of Bush's address after 9/11
Analysis of Bush's address after 9/11
Analysis of Bush's address after 9/11
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of Bush's address after 9/11
Speeches are given for a variety of reasons, yet many result from infamous events that mark history forever. Following the shocking terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, former president George W. Bush gave an uplifting and comforting speech to the American people. Prior to these attacks, Bush’s presidency was rather uneventful and unremarkable. Being the first major crisis he has to respond to as president, Bush faces a great deal of pressure to give a powerful address which will calm the masses, as many people are frightened and extremely worried about what is to come. By strategically ordering his topics, distinctively choosing select pronouns, and referencing religious text, Bush is able to produce a convincing speech which portrays a sense of national unity and …show more content…
By using “our” he also shares the possession and control of the country, in a figurative way. While he shares his love of America and overall sense of hope quite a bit while speaking for the masses, he also uses “I” many times. His first usage of this pronoun occurs when he shares that “immediately after the first attack [he] implemented [the] government’s emergency response plan.” This sudden change of pronouns is to take ownership and show authority, as well as his strength as a president. As opposed to crediting the work of other civil servants who also make this possible, he uses “I” in order to reassure the American people that their very own president is accountable and trustworthy. By using several different choices of pronouns, Bush is able to shift between them, changing his tone as he goes; pronouns can be just as powerful as using different voices, as they signify different
On May 1, 2011, President Barack Obama delivered the speech announcing the death of the former leader of al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden was responsible for thousands of deaths on the September 11th terrorist attacks in the US along with leaving children without a father or a mother for the rest of their lives. The speech was what Americans were waiting for after all the evil that bin Laden has done in the world. Throughout the speech, Obama uses rhetorical appeals such as ethos, pathos, and logos to address the nation saying that justice is served by killing Osama bin Laden and making the speech effective to the audience.
In the “George Bush’ Columbia” speech, George W. Bush used a variety of ways in order to make his mark and effectively assemble his dialog. One of the most prominent strategies Mr. Bush used was his sentence structure. He did a great job shaping his speech by initially addressing the problem at hand. He first stated what happened, who it happened to, and gave his condolences to the ones who didn’t make it, along with their families. Mr. Bush also seemed sincere throughout his speech as he made sure to mention each hero apart of the crew. Another technique George W. Bush displayed was the diction and tone he used while delivering the speech. From listening to the audio last week, I remember the passion behind Bush’s words and the sincerity
Many would argue that President Obama is one of the most effective speakers in the decade. With his amazing speeches, he captivates his audience with his emotion and official tone.
Rhetorical analysis assignment: President’s Address to the Nation. Since the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration has been calling on all citizens and all nations to support his Middle East policy. Nonetheless, the U.S. has been involved in the Middle East struggle for more than half of the century, wars were waged and citizens were killed.
Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This
President Bush and Prime Minister Blair delivered speeches shortly after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York and the Pentagon in Virginia, which occurred on September 11, 2001. Former President George W Bush utilized pathos, anaphora, and personification in his speech to convey an optimistic tone. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, addressing the same topic, utilized mild invective and parallel structure to express an affirmative tone. Throughout the speech, the former President George W. Bush strives to empower Americans by instructing them to remain resolute, but to “go back to [their] lives and routines”. He uses the personal pronoun we and the common pronoun us repeatedly to indicate that the people of the United States, who either saw the event on television or experienced this event firsthand, were and still are involved in this national tragedy.
Ethos demonstrates the speaker’s credibility, separating the non-persuasive and not credited speaker from the trustworthy presenter. President Bush served in the military prior to his term which helped him established ethos – at the time- with America nation. George W. Bush served as a Lieutenant in the Texas and Alabama National Air Guard. Bush brings his military experience into his speech when stating, “Our military is powerful, and it’s prepared.” Moreover, the television crew begins President Bush’s speech with a zoomed out view of the Oval Office, where many presidential speeches have been presented to the American public. The view of the Oval Office habitually starts a connection in the views mind of power and authority. These ethical factors; in addition to, visually linking the Presidents authoritative status the average American viewer received a true sense that America could bounce back, if guided by such as strong
Bush’s method of topic by topic argument along with many emotional appeals was a rather effective way of winning the audience’s support. By appealing to the emotions of the audience Bush was able to give the audience issues they could relate to as well as issues they would feel strongly about. With an emotionally involved audience Bush was able to gather a great number of supporters of his party, just as he intended in his original purpose. The further reference to the character of the people involved in the issues really paid off by drawing the crowd closer to the people working for them. With the topical structure and the appeals used, the speech was a very effective tool in gaining support for the Republican Party from the northern Arizonan audience.
Because of the controversial issues surrounding President G.W. Bush before and during the time of his reelection, the acceptance speech that he delivered is an important piece of literature to study. This diplomatic speech is a piece of rhetorical contribution because the motives and meanings behind any President’s speech is significant to us as citizens of the United States of America. It further warrants our attention because if the audience is able to comprehend the inner meanings and motives behind a presidential speech, then they will eventually be able to differentiate the actual stances and platforms of future presidential candidates and nominees.
Bush demonstrates that with the use of metaphors, personification, and also repetition. Using metaphor, he compares America to steel, saying that America is like steel, but not pliable. Portraying that whatever dangerous act comes to America, America will stay strong and not move. Personification is to explain the reasoning behind the terrorists’ operations and the motives behind this move. Bush gives feeling and visualization traits to the nation, consequently putting it in the nation’s point of view, highlighting what the nation felt and saw. Repetition is to bring America together and strengthen everyone. It is to show that this heartbreaking event did not just affect the victims, but it affects the entire country. The way Bush uses repetition to get the people of America together makes America stronger because the more a country is together, the more power and strength it will possess. As a final point, President Bush’s usage of these three rhetorical devices grabs the attention of the people and helps Bush express the type of tone he wants to get
President Obama’s Inaugural Speech: Rhetorical Analysis. Barrack Obama’s inauguration speech successfully accomplished his goal by using rhetoric to ensure our nation that we will be in safe hands. The speech is similar to ideas obtained from the founding documents and Martin Luther King’s speech to establish ‘our’ goal to get together and take some action on the problems our country is now facing. As President Barack Obama starts his speech, he keeps himself from using ‘me’, ‘myself’, and ‘I’ and replacing it with ‘we’, ‘us’, and ‘together’ to achieve his ethos.
On July 27, 2004, Barack Obama made arguably his most important speech, “The Audacity of Hope”, at the Democratic National Convention Keynote Address. These conventions are for political parties to announce a winner for nomination. All the way through his piece, Obama focuses on connecting Americans and himself to the audience. In fact, at the time, Barack Obama was a US Senate candidate for the United States president, and in making this speech, was offered a window for raising his popularity. Throughout “The Audacity of Hope” speech, Barack Obama implements three main devices to raise his political popularity: repetition, abstract language, and structure.
President Obama’s Address to the nation was presented on January 5, 2016. His speech was shown on all of the major network stations. The main goal of his speech was to get the point across to the nation about the increasing problem of gun use. His speech really focused on the issue of gun control and if it would benefit the country. Overall, the biggest idea of his Address was that gun control is a large issue in the United States. The way to prevent deaths caused by firearms can be prevented in other ways than taking peoples guns away. The examples brought up in this Address really stood out to me. The use of personal, national, and global examples really made his speech stronger on the topic of effectiveness.
There was a time in our country that was so dark it seemed the dawn would never come. September first, two thousand and one- George W. Bush, our president at the time, delivered perhaps the most persuasive speech in modern American history. This speech is so powerful in part by President Bush’s serene diction, his moving use of pathos, and his stunning parallelism. George W. Bush’s diction is the most persuasive part of his speech. When the broadcast of this speech aired, the entire country was in a dangerous state of mass panic, albeit a justified one. When President Bush said, “But they have failed. Our country is strong” in a calm yet powerful voice, he assured our Nation that we would not only survive, but we would thrive in the face of this
The election and inauguration of Donald J. Trump as the forty-fifth President of the United States marked the beginning of a new era of American politics. During his campaign, Trump eschewed the status quo. He was loud. He was bold. His slogan of “Make America Great Again!” garnered a massive response from Americans across the political spectrum. This sentiment permeated President Trump’s inaugural address; there is not a single sentence in which his unabashed pro-America stance is not present. The powerful rhetoric of President Trump’s speech is more than a thank-you to those who voted for him; it is more than an introduction to his presidency. It is an address of unity, of solidarity. It is a reminder of present brokenness and a promise