A Low-Skilled Student Interview

1305 Words3 Pages

A “Low-Skilled” student:

1. Prior Knowledge:
The last student I interviewed was Jaclyn. After observing the class it was clear that Jaclyn was a low-skilled student for the volleyball unit. She often moved away from the ball when it was coming towards her. I started off the interview with Jaclyn by asking her what experience she had with volleyball before the unit started. She said that she had never played volleyball before because she just moved to America and in her home country they didn’t play it in school. She added on that she didn’t play many sports in her home country because it wasn’t as acceptable for girls to play. The next question I asked Jaclyn was what kind of stuff did she know about volleyball before the unit began. The …show more content…

I don’t think that the medium-skilled student, Madison benefited greatly from only playing full volleyball games during class because just like the low-skilled student, she didn’t get as many touches on the ball as the high-skilled students. Madison could have used more drills like bumping to a target and setting to a target. Drills could have helped her focus on her form, so that her bumps and sets went to the target. During the game it is hard to focus on just form because there are many other factors that the student has to worry about. Also I think adding rules to the volleyball games to incorporate more students could have benefited the medium-skilled and low-skilled students. Rules such as each team has to have three touches on the ball before it goes over the net would allow for more students to get practice hitting the …show more content…

As I discussed before in the grading policy appendix the students are only graded on their participation, assessment of knowledge, and Literacy assignments. The students aren’t assessed on the psychomotor domain or the affective domain, which are both important for students to learn. Every student has their own strengths and only assessing them on the cognitive domain does not give every student an equal change to succeed. For example the medium skilled student that I interviewed had a great attitude. Madison was always very optimistic and encouraging to the other students. Students like Madison would benefit from having the affective domain count toward their grading policy. Grading the students on the affective domain would encourage students to be more optimistic. Also some part of the student’s grade should be based on the psychomotor domain. I don’t think counting participation for 30% of the student’s grade reflects their ability to perform the activity/sport for the unit. It is not enough to grade the students on their ability to just run through the motions. For example Mavis, the high skilled student should earn more points for his skill level in the psychomotor domain than the lower skilled students. The lower skilled student may have her own strengths that the higher

More about A Low-Skilled Student Interview

Open Document