A Comparison Of Norma Desmond And Mayerling In Sunset Boulevard

560 Words2 Pages

The famous Hollywood, known by millions across the globe, is recognised for its fancy celebrities, success stories and above all, happy endings. However, not in the 1950 noir film Sunset Boulevard. Directed by Billy Wilder, the film is a tragic and uncanny sort of take on classic Hollywood. The film features characters who try to make it big or to revive their careers in the industry, all ending in a disturbing way. The downfall of the main character, Joe Gillis, is not entirely of his own making. Although he somewhat contributes to it, Norma Desmond and Max Von Mayerling both play a devious role in his downfall. The antagonist of the film, Norma Desmond, plays a cunning and violent role in relation to Joe's downfall and is the main cause of his murder. Throughout the film she exploits and controls Joe and treats her like a pet, rather than a screenwriter. Referring to Joe as “Darling” and referencing that “No one leaves a star”, forces Joe to stay with her, using him to revive her own career. Joe is inclined to listen to Normas instructions mainly for the “dough” but doesn’t realise the harsh consequences ahead of him. Billy Wilder emphasises the unusual surroundings for Joe, as the …show more content…

He is also a contributor to Joe's demise, and mainly does this by obeying Normas' commands, including bringing Joe his things to the mansion, which sets up the story. However, despite listening to Norma as a regular servant would, it is almost as if Max tries to promote and applaud Norma, which allows Joe to continue staying with her. Mentioning her as “the greatest of them all”. Billy Wilders interpretation of Max is mysterious and manipulative, hence using dark lighting and eerie non-diegetic sounds in his presence, but although Max doesn’t physically harm Joe like Norma, he keeps him occupied with her, making Max partially responsible for Joes death in the

Open Document