Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is elasticity of proudction
Concept On Elasticity
What is elasticity of proudction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is elasticity of proudction
substituted such as other soft drinks or coffee. So, if Coca cola increase their price, people will only choose not to buy as it is just a luxury product, making the price to be elastic. In the definition of market, it is narrowly defined as a kind of soft drinks, and there is a lot of different soft drinks. This mean that it tends to have multiple substitute products possible to be exist, and if there is an increase in price of coca cola, people will find the other substitute, hence there will be a huge change in demand, making the price of Coca cola to be elastic. The longer the period, the more elastic the price of Coca cola. As Coca cola has a lot of competitors, their sales depend on number of cola drinks sold. Hence, there …show more content…
Many products are related, and cross elasticity of demand indicates just how they are related. With an equation computed:
(% change in the quantity demanded of good B)/(% change in price of good A)
Using Coca-Cola and Pepsi as our substitute products and making comparison. Whereby, c will stand as Coca-Cola and p stands for Pepsi. Below are 4 graphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) drawn to illustrate the supply and demand analysis for substitute goods first before explaining the cross elasticity of the goods. Besides, graphs will be using red line to indicate for Coca-Cola and blue line for Pepsi for a clearer
…show more content…
In this graph when the price of Coke increases we can see the demand for quantity of Pepsi will gradually increase as well. In our case the Pepsi and Coke will be considered a weak substitute which is explained by tutor2u (2015) whereby a large rise in price of Coke will cause a small increase in quantity demand of Pepsi and the graph gradient will usually have a very steep gradient. It is not a close substitute for a small rise in the price of Coke will affect largely on the quantity demand of the Pepsi and a close substitute is always accompanied with a less steep graph. That is fairly untrue for Coca-Cola has been a better well known and trustable trend compared to Pepsi that’s why they are consider a weak substitute proven with (figure 2). No matter what, Coke remains as a top leading and trusted brand therefore Pepsi will not be much of a threat to the brand Coca-Cola as a result it is just a weak
This is all thanks to the company's ability to stay competitive in the world marketing competitive environment. "The competitive environment, also known as the market structure, is the dynamic system in which your business competes. The state of the system as a whole limits the flexibility of your business."-Stan Mack(CHRON) The ability to stay flexible in todays market has enabled company to create revenue through adapting to changing views of the consumers. Although the first thought when hearing the Coca Cola name is still soda, the trend of non-carbonated and sugary drinks is the most revenue producing products of the company today. Don't get it wrong, the company still has 4 name brand sodas that bring in over $1 billion apiece in revenue annually, but the most substantial revenue is the companies investment in non-carbonated and sugar-based drinks. Products such as Smart Water, Vitamin Water, and Fairlife Superkids(milk) are among the nearly 400 products produced by the company that are not soda-related.(Fortune) So even with soda sales at the 30-year low, The Coca Cola Company continues to adapt to the ever-changing competitive market environment and sustain its household name and
Although produced by main market players, soft carbonated drinks cost more than similar products from local and private label manufacturers, consumers are willing to pay an extra price for the name, particular taste, and image. Fierce competition in the CSD industry forces Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to expand into new and emerging markets which present high potential for the company’s development. However, some foreign markets proved to be highly competitive. Coca-Cola Company’s operations in China faced antitrust regulations, advertising restrictions, and foreign exchange controls. iii.
Therefore, the long-term brand of Coca cola and better pricing strategies would help in competing with Pepsi. Unlike, Pepsi, Coca cola had targeted entering into partnership and alliances with local distributors and firms. This helps to develop strong relationship within the domestic firms to reduce the domestic barriers and thus, enhance the company’s competitiveness (Thabet, 2015). Lastly, the Asian markets consist of related and supporting industries to the soft drink industry that helps the companies in gaining a strong competitive position in the markets. Based on the competitive advantage of nation’s model, Coca cola has more home based advantages to develop a competitive advantage in relation to other countries on a global
Control of market share is the key issue in this case study. The situation is both Coke and Pepsi are trying to gain market share in this beverage market, which is valued at over $30 billion a year. Just how is this done in such a competitive market is the underlying issue. The facts are that each company is coming up with new products and ideas in order to increase their market share.
This includes according to Coca Cola’s annual report, PET resin, preforms and bottles, glass and aluminum bottles, aluminum and steel cans, plastic closures, aseptic fiber packaging, labels, cartons; cases, post-mix packaging, and carbon dioxide. (Kent & Waller, 2016). Fixed cost are costs that remain constant regardless of production output. Some examples of fixed cost that Coca Cola incur includes rent expenses for their bottling plants, salary for thousands of employees, the cost to upkeep their plants and equipment, insurance, and advertising expenses. Advertising is a big production cost for Coca Cola that does not change when output changes this is because companies will continue advertising their products whether output is low or high. The cost of advertising includes magazines ads, billboard signs, celebrity endorsements, and
According to Microeconomics, Price Elasticity of Demand is the responsiveness of the quantity demanded to a change in price, measured by dividing the percentage change in the quantity demanded of a product by the percentage change in the product’s price (Hubbard & O’Brien, 2015). Demand is considered elastic when the quantity demanded for a product increases or decreases in response to price change. Normally, sales increase with price drops and decrease when prices rise. Coca Cola products are considered to have an elastic demand because quantity demanded for its products often change when prices change. If the price of Coke goes from $1.50 a bottle to $2.00 and the price of a 20 oz. Pepsi remains at or around $1.50
Elasticity is one of the most important theories in economics and it is a measure of responsiveness (Baker, 2006)i. There are mainly two types of elasticity, the elasticity of demand which includes price elasticity of demand, income elasticity of demand, and cross elasticity of demand as well as elasticity of supply (McConnell, Brue, & Flynn, 2009)ii. The degree to which a demand or supply curve reacts to a change in price is the curve's elasticity (Lingham, 2009)iii. Elasticity varies among products because some products may be more essential to the consumer.
How has the competition between Coke and Pepsi affected the industry’s profits? Can Coke and Pepsi sustain their profits in the wake of flattening demand and the growing popularity of non-carbonated drinks? The soft drink industry is a highly profitable industry and its success is due to the large consumption of non-alcoholic beverages through which both concentrate producers and bottlers are profitable. Given the U.S. Industry Consumption Statistics, Exhibit 1, it is clear that, after deducting beer and wine, soft drinks account for about 90 % of the total liquid consumption, while Coke and Pepsi account for about 75 % of the soft drink industry. The high consumption of CSDs is related to the soft drink industry selling to consumers through five principal channels: food stores, convenience stores, vending, fountains and others.
One method that Toyota can consider is using the price elasticity of demand to determine whether to increase or decrease the sale price of their automobiles. The responsiveness or sensitivity of consumers to a price change is measured by a product's price elasticity of demand (McConnell & Brue, 2004). Market goods can be described as elastic or inelastic goods as change in quantity demanded for that good. If demand is elastic, a decrease in price will increase total revenue. Even though a lower price would generate lower sales revenue per unit, more than enough additional units would be sold to offset lower price (McConnell & Brue, 2004). In a normal market condition, a price increase leads to a decreased demand, and a price decrease leads to increased demand. However, a change in income affecting demand is more complex.
Price changes affect demand for various foods. According to the economic theory, consumption of a certain product falls as the price of that item rises...
Experimentation with the new market for carbonated beverages on the decline coke has done experiments in new flavors and healthier alternatives to try to stay competitive. As well as investing in “Keurig Green Mountain is a K-Cup maker but has a new Keurig Cold that can deliver Coca-Cola through the new system.” (Cooper, 2014)
Pepsi and Coca-Cola are both sodas, but they differ in terms of the satisfying flavors, the color and the graphic design that represents their two products, and then how Coke makes more money than Pepsi. With that said, you should have gotten the ideology of what we will go further in discussing about. Everybody loves these two very well-known sodas which can inject caffeine into you, which makes you all jittery in filling you up with an energetic energy. Alright, enough of this, let's go straight in-depth in talking about the two rivals throughout this paper of how Pepsi beats Coke in sales, but Coke is usually ahead when it comes to annual net income (Feigin) or how Pepsi is a sweeter brand compared to Coke, though Coke brand is more valuable
For example, the chart would reflect the correlation between demand and the products price, or in the case of supply, the supplied products and its price. Moreover, supply, demand, and price, along with supply elasticity can be graphed and analyzed. This particular method of tracking and analyzing data is essential in identifying the markets status and determining the best plausible route (Skousen, 2014). By studying supply and demand, one is also able to identify whether an excess or a shortage in demand or supply is occurring, or whether an equilibrium has been attained. Consequently, it is evident that supply and demand take part in the market economy and greatly influence and impact the price value. Furthermore, to express how supply and demand impacts the price value, the price value of airline tickets will be utilized as an
Also, this will implicate the demand for the price and give a negative output of -0.4, in which this will cause the coefficient of ( P) for the microwavable food to be classified as inelastic. The cross price elasticity will reveal a substitute good because when the product price rises, the demand for our good goes up and the competitors in the marketplace will lose customers. The coefficient of (PX) equals 0.13. In fact, when the demand for competitors increases their price, our firm will continue to gain customers, so the larger the outcome, the better effect it will have on the demand of the product
In terms of promotional activities, the advertising and giving away of free offers and vacations by Coca cola and Basmati rice by Pepsi, the coca cola’s goal in connecting the youth to the market, the different promotional TV campaigns in India using of celebrities, and the Pepsi sponsorship of cricket and soccer sports. In terms of pricing policies, Pepsi got a quicker market share by their belligerent pricing policies and coca cola’s 15-25% price cut down in the market. In terms of distribution arrangement, the bottling and packaging of products for better distribution around