Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison of 1984 book versus movie
1984 George Orwell Symbolism
Comparison of 1984 book versus movie
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison of 1984 book versus movie
These two almost-primordial concepts of the book weren’t explained in a manner to get the viewers to question themselves and the world around them like the book does. These themes should be prioritized for they apply to reality; society could relate to the loss of use of meaningful vocabulary in the english language.In the book, all themes, including interdependent themes like, love and sexuality, independence and language are intricately depicted throughout the span of 400 pages. Meanwhile, a movie adaptation of only 2 hours would never be able to put forward all the themes at once. This results in a composition with less themes and analysable content. Another crucial element of the book that portrays the importance of truth and history is not properly explained and emphasized in the movie.Since this relates to the protagonist Winston, …show more content…
it should have been more highlighted in the movie. Winston’s job of rewriting the past symbolizes a lot; it is crucial to the understanding of the intentions of the government of Oceania.
The movie only offers basic knowledge about the totalitarian government, which could be dangerous because it changes the panorama for the viewer. This new perspective isn’t very practical because it focuses more on what is happening from a zoomed lense, leaving out the big picture. One thing's for sure, by the end of the book, the reader is left in with a vivid memory of not just particular scenes, but the summation of events that produce a desired effect : ponderment.
Furthermore, the fact that the book leaves the reader in compulsion to analyze much of what takes place makes it more effective. In the 1984 novel, deeper and more profound meanings are present.After all, Orwell’s life was pretty much coming to an end while 1984 was written, making it his ultimate testament. Every single detail has unexpected symbolism behind it, causing the reader to inevitably stop and question things.The movie, in opposition, just skims through the plot ,and doesn’t give the viewer enough time to stop and think. The suspense in the movie keeps you focused on
what’s happening rather than what happened.By the end of the movie, the viewer has only grasped the major themes. Many people think that grasping the major themes sufizes.This is wrong because it is particularly the minor themes that add meaning to the major themes.For example, in the movie, when Winston is reading the book , Julia seems to be relatively interested. However, in the book, Julia falls asleep as Winston is reading it. For the reader, this changes everything because it gives a negative view of Julia. Julia becomes a selfish, not-so-morally-intellectual being. This small detail makes us travel through the different dimensions of rebellion. We come to a realization that the theme of rebellion is present in different forms in the novel. The beauty in this is that the reader gets to visualize in depth the theme of rebellion which is in fact related to the theme of identity. Without this detail in the novel, the reader would not learn that not all forms of rebellion derive from goodness. Julia is rebellious for selfish reasons, not because she possesses an eccentric, genuinely-concerned personality like Winston. However, in the movie, the theme of rebellion is seen as a more of a superficial aspect. It is due to this that the theme of identity is underdeveloped in the movie. This specific example proves that some themes are reinforced through the minor ones. Irrevocably, the number of altered or erased details accumulated, resulting in less profound messages to be present in the movie. In closing, the book 1984 portrays the full message of the author more efficiently than the movie. This is due to the vivid and intricate descriptions found throughout the book, many themes and messages being left out in the movie, and the fact that the reader is overcome by the thought-provoking material of the book.Even if different perspectives may lead to different opinions about the effectiveness of either compositions, it is important to note that both the book and the movie have unique methods of communicating messages, and therefore shouldn’t be underestimated. In spite of this,books are always the prefered method when it comes to digging out and analyzing messages for they are more concrete and practical . After all, there is a reason why teachers use the 1984 book over the movie to teach in their classrooms.
In “1984,” Orwell portrays Winston’s secret struggle to undermine the totalitarian rule of Big Brother and the Party in Oceania. The different government agencies, such as the Thought Police and Ministry of Love, exercise unrestricted totalitarian rule over people. Winston actively seeks to join the rebellion and acquire the freedoms undermined by the Party. On the other hand, Heinlein’s brief narrative, “The Long Watch,” depicts a contrasting struggle championed by Dahlquist against the power hungry Colonel Towers and the Patrol. In his struggle to prevent the total domination of the world by the Patrol, Dahlquist chooses to sacrifice his life. Le Guin’s “The Ones who walk away from Omelas,” illustrates a communal form of injustice tolerated for the benefit of the entire city but necessitating the inhumane imprisonment of a child. He portrays the ambiguity of human morality and the individual struggle to determine right from wrong. The authors address social change and power in different ways, reflective of their individual perceptions. Hence, in each narrative, the author illustrates the individual’s role in effecting social change and the conditions under which such change becomes possible.
From the start, the movie is adapted from the novel and therefore it could not cover everything, some actions or acts in the novel are too dense such that it is not of any importance to angle them in the movie. It is very realistic to everyone that the movie cannot cover every single paragraph in the novel even the memorable ones. Some materials are left out in the film, and others were changed.
Winston is confronted with struggle throughout the entirety of George Orwell`s dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. Living within a totalitarian regime subsequently causes Winston to seek approaches for dealing with such abundant oppression; he finds liberation through self-awareness, understanding and ultimately rebellion. First, Winston realizes that “if you want to keep a secret you must also hide it from yourself”, alluding to the notion of thoughtcrime (162). This recognition exemplifies the complete cognizance that Winston has regarding the oppressive society displayed throughout the novel. Next, Syme states “It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words”, alluding to the idea of Newspeak (28). This statement directly correlates to Winston speaking with other party members to gain knowledge about how others feels about policies deployed by the government. This information-seeking also connects with Winston`s rebellion, as he actively searched for others to join his uprising, which is shown when Winston tells O’Brien “We want to join [The Brotherhood]” (171). Winston’s attempt to join a rebellious organization exhibits his evident desire to release his suppressed emotions. Winston devises a very methodical approach to deal with the problematic society he resides in.
A utopian society represents a perfect, idealistic civilization, while a dystopian society describes an unpleasant environment for the individuals living within it. George Orwell’s 1984 portrays many characteristics of a dystopian society. Very similarly, Veronica Roth’s Divergent tells the story of a government that forcefully separates and controls its citizens. 1984 and Divergent both share the presence of harsh regulation and control from their respective governments. Orwell and Roth’s novels compare Ministries and Factions, conformity and obedience, Proles and the Factionless, and government regulation, in a similar, yet negative way.
We feel the same emotions of the protagonist --> readers are never ahead of the narration and only know what Winston knows
From a structural perspective, movies and novels appear as polar opposites. A film uses actors, scripts, and a set in order to create a visual that can grab and keep the attention of their viewers. However, an author strives to incorporate deeper meaning into their books. Despite these differences in media, 1984 and The Hunger Games present unique, yet similar ideas.
Undoubtedly, the thought of living in, or forming a utopian society has flashed through nearly every person’s mind. A few people have even tried to make this ideal dream society a reality. Unfortunately, within the pursuit of these societies the leaders become corrupt and begin to become paranoid with the fear of rebellion. Hundreds of people were murdered during the reigns of Adolph Hitler and Joseph Stalin in what they considered measures to maintain peace and stability within their respective “perfect” society. One must also consider the hardships that the citizens were forced to endure while living under these oppressive governments.
The government portrayed in the book as well as in the film is referred to as “Big Brother” the mastermind of establishing a totalitarian government. A totalitarian government is a single party that rules over everything and is superior to everyone. The totalitarian government was created to prevent corruption in the society and keep the people believing in what “Big Brother” wants them to believe. “Big Brother” kept the society in believing his reality by intimidation and brain washing. Also the lack of privacy was enforced by the use of surveillance like system known as the tele. The involvement of the government helped in conforming and controlling the society.
Love is an underlying theme in the novel. Love can be seen as nonexistence in this totalitarian society. The marriage between Winston and Katherine was a disastrous one because they were only married for fifteen months and they can n...
2. Through Winston’s interactions with his other co-workers, it's fascinating to notice what thoughts he has while communicating. He constantly thinks about how someone can be easily vaporized, such as Syme. As much as Winston tries to fight against the Party’s ideals, I think he’s already conformed to some of them. He desires to form a true bond of friendship, but through his interactions with Syme, who he considers as a “friend”, his beliefs makes it difficult for him. I believe that Winston is too far ahead of everyone because his mind is still stuck in the past, such that he is disgusted by those who vocally praise the Party. Additionally, the actions that the Party demands of its people frightens me with the idea of a new edition of Newspeak dictionary. The way how Syme enthusiastically explains to Winston the idea of decreasing the span of vocabulary to express ideas in one word with various prefixes ruins the beauty of language. In my opinion, language is a way how people
... the great religious impact it is meant to have. Christ, should and will, win out in the end – as the last line of the novel says, “Amen; even so come, Lord Jesus!”
Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and 1984 by George Orwell, share common feature that the power holder uses advanced technology to control its citizens. In terms of controlling the masses, the method of technology use vary according to the hegemonic idea or ruling policy. In these two texts, the hegemonic ideas are completely different: Brave New World is based on an extreme consumerist society, and 1984 manages society based on totalitarian ideology. The difference in ruling policy for the society management has a huge influence on technology use. When people see each technology use in these texts, they suggest the harshness or the dark side of the social system but, by comparing the mass people reactions to the society system and technology
Orwell’s ideas about totalitarianism are brilliantly shown in 1984. His use of multiple plot structures allowed him to keep the reader engaged while spending copious amounts of time explaining every aspect of life in London. Ultimately, 1984 is a progressive plot, but it also makes good use of in media res, flashback, and episodic plot structures to bring the reader into Orwell’s London.
There are lots of ways to compare 1984 by George Orwell to Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. They both have to do with very futuristic ideas.
...ay he does, leaving Winston suffering in an eternal hell. This death of the mind is far worse than physical death for Winston, as the one thing he had –freedom– is stolen from him. This “death” is meant to leave the reader angered and annoyed, in order for the book to serve the purpose of leaving the reader disgusted by totalitarian regimes. Most people, at the time the novel was written, had great hopes and expectations for the future; it just so happened that communism became the new social experiment. Many people truly believed that this sort of governance was the best way to rule a country. George Orwell was able to see through the picturesque depiction. Today, almost all people would agree that they would not wish to live in a totalitarian society; Orwell was successful in his attempt to warn the general population of communistic ruling.