1984 George Orwell Analysis

1028 Words3 Pages

Centuries ago, around the world, some people were enslaved and would have to follow everything their leader said, having no say in their life choices. In 1984 by George Orwell, the novel revolves around a man named Winston Smith, who lives in Oceania, a totalitarian dictatorship run by “Big Brother”, who restricts the thoughts, actions, and words of its citizens. The government engraves its slogans, “WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH”, into the minds of the people of the society. Winston is one of the very few that see that Big Brother limits their lives, but 85% of the population, proles, does not. In this society, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY tells of that if you are free, you will be a slave to your own thoughts and ideas, and …show more content…

The proles have no knowledge of government secrets and corruption, and have no power. They follow and believe everything Big Brother says. “In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it...Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows."(69) This quote shows that, even if you have the correct knowledge of something, if the Party was to say otherwise, you would have to follow what they say, because they know all and if you had freedom, your other view on the situation would be you being a slave to your own independent thoughts on the situation. This supports the claim that the people of the society have no power. It is incorrect in the society to say two plus two makes four, you're not free, therefore you have no power to disagree and be a slave to your own ideas, but you follow the one big idea, the Party’s idea. “So long as they continued to work and breed, their other activities were without importance...All that was required of them was a primitive patriotism which could be appealed to whenever it was necessary to make them accept longer working-hours or shorter rations...As the Party slogan put it: ‘Proles and animals are free.” (62-3) This shows how proles have no power by how the Party basically treats them as if they are animals, how they …show more content…

But the probes do not have knowledge or even question that their lives are limited. With a vast majority of the population being probes, their ignorance gives the Party more power, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH. The Party also tries its hardest to limit the people from even trying to think of anything, especially something against Big Brother (thoughtcrime). They also try hard to eliminate anything or anyone that may have or be evidence of corruption. “‘Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there’s no reason or excuse for committing thoughtcrime. It is merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control’”(48) This evidence shows how the Party keeps shortening the range of vocabulary to limit the thoughts of the people, so they soon will not be able to comprehend thoughts against Big Brother. This connects to the thesis because it teaches that the Party even shortens the range vocabulary so it can limit the extent of thinking one can do, to decrease ways to have thoughts against Big Brother. “Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present controls the

Open Document