10b 5 Essay

1289 Words3 Pages

In the Securities Class action there exists the 10(b)(5) and the common law action claims for deceit, notwithstanding that both travel under the name of “fraud.” Thus, It is important to compare and draw a contrast between the requirements of a private action under the common law fraud action claim and the 10b-5 statutory claim enacted by the Security Exchange Commission, pursuant to its authority under 10b of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The confusion surrounding the elements of the private action and the 10b-5 has long been debated.
In the words of Harvard and Fordham professors(John C.P. Goldberg* Benjamin C. Zipursky* , The Fraud on the market Tort - 2013, url : http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/about/privatelaw/related-content/2013-working-paper-series/goldberg_zipursky_the-fraud-on-the-market-tort_10-13-13.pdf …show more content…

Dura, also created a lot of confusion by not differentiating between the materiality and the misrepresentation(Dura’s addition of economic loss to the list has also been criticized as not following from common- law deceit precedents. John C. P. Goldberg & Benjamin C. Zipursky, The Fraud-on-the-Market Tort, 66 VAND. L. REV. 1755, 1768, 1773 (2013) (damage understood as a prudential filter by which judges have excluded certain well-founded but trivial deceit claims; this requirement “dissipates (or, perhaps, disappears)” when plaintiff only seeks relief based on rescission or unjust enrichment; because courts have understood damages as a pragmatic filter, they have not insisted on the exacting conception of economic loss invoked by Dura). which by common law and Supreme Court was made a separate element(See Basic, 485 U.S. at 239 n.17 (distinguishing materiality—addressed in that case—from duty to disclose, an element of misrepresentation). One of the major problems is that the shareholders only gets the information which the corporation would like to divulge as their is no duty to disclose good or bad news. Therefore, with the principle applied in the Dura case there will be no 10b-5 claim. In a recent decision of 2015, Omnicare’s case it was laid down that the material misrepresentation should be of a material fact as …show more content…

Alternately, the Court has to be akin to the differences between Fraud on the Market and common law deceit.(See, e.g., Jill E. Fisch, The Trouble with Basic: Price Distortion after Halliburton, 90 WASH. U. L. REV. Deceit and the the reliance was developed in an environment where there were face to face transactions. It cannot be expected to apply in today’s world where there is institutionalization, globalization and computerized trading. the Justices still believe that they are applying the common law deceit to set the contours for the 10b-5 liability.
According to this view, the securities law derived has departed from the tradition common law deceit principles. The Fraud-on-the-market claims are claims for a public or a regulatory wrong, and not a private wrong.It is alleged that the defendant has harmed a public resource-the market by distorting prices.(Fisch, supra note 9.) Securities class actions are mechanism for the protection of the market rather than

More about 10b 5 Essay

Open Document