Economics studies the monetary policy of a government and other information using mathematical or statistical calculations (Differences). Classical and Keynesian are two completely different economic theories. Each theory takes its own approach on monetary policy, consumer behavior, and government spending. There are a few distinctions that separate these two theories. To begin, the Classical Economic Theory was made in the 1700's, which was during and after industrialization. Say's Law, which is the law of the market, is a principle of classical economics that says "supply makes its own demand" (Classical vs. Keynesian). It is supply driven and is also based off of a Laissez-Faire economic market. As we learned in our previous studies, Laissez-Faire means free market, which does not depend on the government. Having little to no government allows individuals to act according to their own self interest in regards to economic decisions. Government spending is not a major part in the Classical Theory. It is more focused on consumer spending and business investment because they are the most important parts of economic growth. Classical economists believe that too much government spending will increase the public sector and decrease the private sector where wealth is created. This theory is mainly focused on making long term solutions to economic problems. Classical economists also take into consideration how new theories and current policies will effect, negatively or positively, the free market environment (Differences). In contrast, the Keynesian Economic Theory was presented in the 1930's, during the Great Depression, by a man named John Maynard Keynes (Classical vs. Keynesian). It relies on spending and aggregate demand which makes this theory demand driven. These economists believe that aggregate demand is influenced by public and private decisions. The public means the government, and the private means individuals and businesses. Aggregate demand sometimes affects production, employment, and inflation. When the economy starts to slack, they rely on the government to build it back up. Keynesian economists, similar to Classical economists, also believe that the economy is made up of consumer spending, government spending, and business investments. However, the Keynesian Theory says government spending can improve economic growth in the absence of consumer spending and business investment (Differences). According to the Keynesian theory, wages and prices are not flexible. A static price will give a horizontal aggregate supply curve in the short run (Classical and Keynesian Economics). The main goal of the government stimulus was to save and create jobs almost immediately.
Keynesianism and monetarism are both ways to stabilize the economy and promote growth when need. In keynesianism, government uses fiscal policy which is a list of policies that government spending and taxing can be used to improve the performance of an economy. The government produces stabilization by taxing and spending yearly plans. Taxing can occur when inflation is high and lowering taxes tends to occur during a high percentage of unemployment. By lowering taxes, it increases disposable income or the party of income that goes to financial responsibilities. When people have more money, they are able to spend more which in return goes into jump starting the economy. Monetary Policy is another policy used in Keynesianism which is a list of protocol designed to regulate the economy by setting the amount of money that is in circulation and controlled interest levels. The Federal Reserve system also known as the central banking system in the U.S. which holds control of this policy. Monetary policy has three tools used my the Federal Reserve to enforce this policy. Reserve Requirement is the first tool that determines the lowest amount of money a bank must possess and is not able to lend out. The second way to enforce monetary policy is by using the discount rate or the interest rank a bank will charge. The f...
Before the introduction of Keynesian economics and Milton Friedman’s Monetarism theory, there was classical economics. These economists believed in self-adjusting market mechanisms, however with that the market needs perfect competition. Wages and prices in the market must be flexible. These economists believe that supply and demand pulls would always help the economy reach full employment.
Just as classical liberalists did not want government intervention in the market, they do not want it affecting their life in other major ways. As defi...
Although most economists cannot come to agreement on the definition of economics, the preceding quote from l. Robbins, in my opinion, seems to just about sum it up. Since the beginning, when man first had to choose between hunting and sleeping, there was economics. Today economics is in everything we buy, use, and make, from the gas in our cars to the food on our tables, economics plays a vital role with the manufacture, distrubution and consumption of each. To help us better understand the economic trends, certain men have become economist. In this paper I will revisit four of the major economists’ theories. Starting with the theories of Adam Smith, a philosopher well as an economist, to the modern (relatively) day theories of Milton Friedman, a Nobel Prize awardee, we will chronologically review the theories of Adam Smith, Karl Marx, John Maynard Keynes, and Milton Friedman.
Keynes and Hayek each approach the economy from a different perspective. In Keynes’ estimation, it is all about the flow of money. The economy is improving when money is moving, and thus, stability is achieved as much as is possible. Consequently, spending, and more specifically government spending, is the key to unlock the door blocking economic growth. By contrast, Hayek contends that money is not everything. What the money is used for, whether it be saved, invested, loaned, or spent, also plays an important role in the progression of the economy. Growth comes from saving and investing not consumption and spending. The stability of the economy, according to Hayek, is brought about by the forces of supply and demand.
Very few people truly believe in every aspect of Neoclassicalism. This is due to its belief on the assumption that supply and demand are equal and that the markets are always clear. Neoclassicalism is heavily devoted to mathematical models to describe the economy and the interaction between individuals within. These models tend to stray away from reality; in a way they show that neoclassical theories aren’t necessarily realistic, but they still help find the answers economists need. George E. P. Box said “Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful.” This is proven by Neoclassical
The clash between Hayek and Keynes has defined modern economics. On one hand we have Keynes standpoint, which was if investment exceeded savings, there would be inflation, but if savings exceeded inflation, a recession would be present. On the other hand Hayek presented ideas of less government initiative and to have people make their choices on economic decisions more freely. Hayek argument on Keynes government spending was that if the economy should be more concerned with consuming or investing.
Classical economists such as, Jean Baptiste Say, Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Thomas Robert Malthus, had a different view about the role of the government in a capitalistic society. The classical economists believed in a laissez-faire economy. They believed that the government should keep their hands off the nation’s economy. They felt that the market will be able to keep itself stable, without the intervention of the government. Jean Baptiste Say believed that supply would create its own demand. The classical economists had an assumption that the aggregate production of goods and services in the economy generate enough income to purchase all output. They also had the assumption that savings by the household sector matches investment expenditures on capital goods by the business sector.
Keynes believed that price levels have to be stabled in order to have a stable economy, and that is only possible if interest rates go down when prices rise. He also believed that the market forces alone will not deliver full employment but boosting government spending (main force of the economy in Keynes theory) will aim in his theory full employment or close to that. He believes Government intervention and spending will finally stop recession, unemployment and most importantly depression. Spending will increase the aggregate demand of the economy. As shown in the graph, Keynes believes that as you increase aggregate demand (shift it out from AD 1 TO AD 2), the real GDP increases (real GDP 1 to real GDP 2), this will then decrease unemployment (hopefully having 0% of unemployment).
John Maynard Keynes classical approach to economics and the business cycle has dominated society, especially the United States. His idea was that government intervention was necessary in a properly functioning economy. One economic author, John Edward King, claimed of the theory that:
The central thesis of The Wealth of Nations is that capital is best employed for the production and distribution of wealth under conditions of governmental noninterference, or laissez-faire, and free trade. In Smith’s view, the production and exchange of goods can be stimulated, and a consequent rise in the general standard of living attained, only through the efficient operations of private industrial and commercial entrepreneurs acting with a minimum of regulation and control by the governments. To explain this concept of government maintaining laissez-faire attitude toward the commercial endeavors, Smith proclaimed the principle of the “invisible hand”: Every individual in pursuing his or her own good is led, as if by an invisible hand, to achieve the best good for all. Therefore any interference with free competition by government is almost certain to be injurious.
Keynesian method and world-systems theory deserve special attention. It is Keynesianism that makes possible for the radical political economists to apply the bipolar model, centered on
interpreted by economists like Arthur Cicil Piguo and Joseph Schumperter. Another economist we will get into is John Maynard Keynes. We will answer the question on whether Keynes economic work either a devastating critique of the neoclassical theory, a new approach the can be effectively integrated with the neoclassical theory or if his work implied only some minor changes in the basic neoclassical model which is still adequate today.
The disparities between the two views of the economy lead to very different policies that have produced contradictory results. The Keynesian theory presents the rational of structuralism as the basis of economic decisions and provides support for government involvement to maintain high levels of employment. The argument runs that people make decisions based on their environments and when investment falls due to structural change, the economy suffers from a recession. The government must act against this movement and increase the level of employment by fiscal injections and training of the labour force. In fact, the government should itself increase hiring in crown corporations. In contrast the Neoliberal theory attributes the self-interest of individuals as the determinant of the level of employment.
In order to understand how economics really work in today’s age we must think about how those economic ideas, revolutionary theories of many economists, that helped to shape the economic structure as we know it now, through many individuals and school of economic though that has existed through the ages. These schools are “the mercantilists, the physiocrats, the classical economists, Marxian economics, the neoclassical economists and the monetarist economics. For this essay I will only refer to the classical economists and the neoclassical economists.