Classical and Neoclassical Economists: Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes

1278 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Classical and neoclassical economics

In order to understand how economics really work in today’s age we must think about how those economic ideas, revolutionary theories of many economists, that helped to shape the economic structure as we know it now, through many individuals and school of economic though that has existed through the ages. These schools are “the mercantilists, the physiocrats, the classical economists, Marxian economics, the neoclassical economists and the monetarist economics. For this essay I will only refer to the classical economists and the neoclassical economists.
The two most influential economists that helped to shape our economy with their thoughts and theories that are still used in modern economy are Adam Smith a classical economist and John Maynard Keynes a neoclassical economist. These two economists are the most famous economists of all times. Even though that its known that their thoughts are opposites to one and other they also share some similarities for example as suggested by (Stephen Yearwood. (2013)) “Both understood that the key to economic prosperity is to keep the money circulating.” They both According to (Greydark (2009)) Demonstrated “that the field of economics is vast, flexible, and able to be interpreted in many ways.” Each influenced the growth of economic thought and birth of modern market based societies. According to (best brielle. (2010)) “Each economist has similar ideas yet different opinions that distinguish them as economic leaders”.
Adam Smith, is known as the Father of economics, Capitalism and advocate of free market also known as laissez-faire. His theory of invisible hand of free enterprise and his 1776 Wealth of Nations is what he is most admired for, also the canons of taxation, labour theory of value, ...

... middle of paper ...

...th: Compared and Contrasted Ideas. Available: http://www.studymode.com/essays/John-Maynard-Keynes-And-Adam-Smith-481110.html. Last accessed 18/01/2014.
4. Tom Gorman. (2003). Three Economists and Their Theories. Available: http://www.infoplease.com/cig/economics/three-economists-their-theories.html. Last accessed 19/01/2014.
5. Yousuf Dhamee. (2005). Adam Smith and the Division of Labor. Available: http://www.victorianweb.org/economics/division.html. Last accessed 19/01/2014.
6. Steven Sanders. (2011). "Value in Use" versus "Value in Exchange". Available: http://witandwisdomofanengineer.blogspot.ie/2011/05/value-in-use-versus-value-in-exchange.html. Last accessed 19/01/2014.
7. Daniel A. Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw. (1998). Keynesian Economic Theory 1. Available: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/pdf/ess_keynesiantheory.pdf. Last accessed 20/01/2014.

Show More
Related

  • The Humanistic Tradition By Gloria Fiero's Chapter Summary

    727 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Humanistic Tradition the author, Gloria Fiero introduces Adam smith as a Scottish moral philosopher, pioneer of political economy, and a key figure in the Scottish Enlightenment. Smith also known as the Father of Political economy, is best known for one of his two classic works An Inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. Fiero looks at Smith’s work because the division of labor is important. One thing Smith thinks is even more important for creating a wealthy nation, is to interact and have open trade with different countries. Fiero states,“It is necessary, though very slow and gradual, consequence of a certain propensity in human nature which has in view no such extensive utility; the propensity to truck, barter,

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Adam Smith And Karl Polanyi's The Great Transformation

    230 Words  | 1 Pages

    Adam Smith begins his analysis of the market society with a look at the division of labor. He elaborates on the idea that the division of labor is essential for the growth of a civilization. Smith explains how for example, the production of pins can be done more efficiently with the breaking down and deconstruction of

    Read More

  • Classical And Keynesian Economics: The Concepts Of Classical Economics

    914 Words  | 2 Pages

    Classical economics as postulated by the 19th century British economist David Ricardo states – in modern economic terms – that an economy will achieve its natural levels of employment (full employment) and reach its potential output on its own without any government intervention. While the economy may undergo periods of less than natural levels of employment or not yet reach its potential output, it will, in the long run do so. If Mr. Ricardo was still alive, his favorite album would be The Long Run by The Eagles (1979). Using modern economic terms to further describe classical economics, an economy will tend to operate at a level given by the long run aggregate supply curve. While many believe that the concepts of classical economics are for

    Read More

  • Adam Smith's Political Philosophies

    88 Words  | 1 Pages

    Adam Smith was a philosopher whose political philosophies was based off of economics. He believed to some extent that there should be a redistribution of wealth, but at the same time there should be a limit to government interference in economy. He wanted the state to end politics that favor industry over agriculture or vice versa, and that business should be left to the business people. He also believed that the government cannot make people virtuous with laws, and that the state should not promote religion or

    Read More

  • Dead Economists Summary

    1150 Words  | 3 Pages

    Let’s get started with Adam Smith and his second coming. Adam smith was one of the greatest economics minds that have ever existed, teaching us that our wealth is not just in gold and silver but in the products that we produce and commerce we engage in! Much like today we can understand the idea of Gross National Product and how we can better adjust our habits and ourselves. Smith unlike most economists of that age understood the value in hard work and social aspect behind our decisions.

    Read More

  • John Maynard Keynes Versus Friederich A. Hayek

    593 Words  | 2 Pages

    Two major economic thinkers of the of the early twentieth century, John Maynard Keynes and Friedrich A. Hayek, hold very different economic viewpoints. Keynes is among the most famous economic philosophers. Keynes, whose theories gained a reputation during the Great Depression in the 1930s, focused mainly on an economy's bust. It is where the economy declines and finally bottoms out, that Keynesian economics believes the answers lie for its eventual recovery. On the other hand, Hayek believed that in studying the boom, answers would be provided to lead the economy out of the bust that was sure to follow.

    Read More

  • Essay On John Locke And Adam Smith

    616 Words  | 2 Pages

    Andy Smith J. Ward February 17, 2014 History 102 Revolutionary Thinkers Locke versus Smith John Locke and Adam Smith were critically acclaimed to be revolutionary thinkers and their thoughts and reasons have very good reasons backed up with ways to describe the Economy and the Government as inefficient or wrong in their Era of their lifetime. John Locke and Adam Smith are both believers that the government should be active in supporting social and political change in the economy. Both Locke and Smith’s thoughts can be equally said revolutionary in comparison, but in terms of what era they lived in and more history that has happened to see more mistakes to correct what happened and possible future outcomes for a clear revolutionary though I believe Adam Smith’s ideas were more revolutionary and his dominant ideas that have helped what we think is the way we do things in todays economy. Smith's influential work, The Wealth of Nations, was written based on the help with the country’s economy who based it off his book. Smith’s book was mainly written on how inefficient mercantilism was, but it was also written to explain what Smith thought was to be a brilliant yet complicated idea of an economic system based on the population and the social ladder.

    Read More

  • The Enlightenment and a Desire for a Free Market

    1442 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Adam Smith." Adam Smith. Library of Economics and Liberty, 2008. Web. 4 Feb. 2011. .

    Read More

  • Economics: Keynes vs. Hayek

    1730 Words  | 4 Pages

    John Maynard Keynes classical approach to economics and the business cycle has dominated society, especially the United States.  His idea was that government intervention was necessary in a properly functioning economy.   One economic author, John Edward King, claimed of the theory that:

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Adam Smith, David Ricardo And Thomas Malthus

    1219 Words  | 3 Pages

    Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Thomas Malthus have all greatly influenced how people thought about modern economics, especially in areas relating to markets, in terms of the economy and whether certain things affected population rates. In this essay I will cover each of the three topic areas and how each economist interpreted these areas in order to explain why certain phenomena occur within British economics, most of which are still widely accepted today.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Invisible Hand

    572 Words  | 2 Pages

    Additionally, since Europe was in a pivoting point, this would allow them to have methods to maintain control in other parts of the world. Other characteristics of the Industrial Revolution involved the shift from animate to inanimate power. For instance, in the mining industry, horses and wheelbarrows were used to increase output in production. The lecture examined Adam Smith and his essay on the Invisible Hand. This influential concept of the invisible hand establishes the intersection of society and economics. Smith believed strongly is the laissez-fair approach which translates into telling the government to not meddle and allow the people to practice individualism. He believed that involving the politics of any government would only reflect the greed or power the politician desired over the common welfare of the people. Unfortunately, in today’s economy, economists are involved in conflicting large-scale dilemmas because the lack of understanding the importance of sacrificing one’s self-interest to help the whole nation as a whole. Even though the economy of the United States isn’t a simple black and white picture, it is too hard to deny that the politicians that we elected play an important role in the

    Read More

  • Classical Economics vs. Keynesian Economics

    1187 Words  | 3 Pages

    Classical Economics is a theory that suggests by leaving the free market alone without human intervention; equilibrium will be obtained. This theory was the first school of thought for economists and one of the major theorists and founders of Classical Economics was Adam Smith. Smith stated, “By pursuing his own interest, he (man) frequently promotes that (good) of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I (Adam Smith) have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good.”(Patil) Classical Economic theory assumes three basic ideas: Flexible Prices, Shay’s Law, and Savings-Investment equality. Flexible prices in Classical theory suggests prices will rise and fall as needed but is not always true, due to, the interference of government agencies including unions and laws. Smith stated in the Wealth of the Nation (1776), “Civil government, so far it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.” (Patil) Shay’s Law implies supply creates its own demand and demand is not based on production or supply.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Marx And Adam Smith

    2395 Words  | 5 Pages

    Being from the same era- the industrial revolution, yet separated by almost a century in existence, Adam Smith and Karl Marx had contrasting and distinctive theories of economics. Smith, being a Professor of moral philosophy, associated moral theory with economics, which led to the development of the modern world capitalism. Karl Marx positioned his thoughts on injustice and disparity between different social classes, these thoughts became the underlying foundations of communism.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Jean Jacque Rousseau Theory Of Human Nature

    685 Words  | 2 Pages

    Of the many well-known theorists of modern political time Adam Smiths writings in The Wealth of Nations had contributed to the Scottish Enlightenment of the eighteenth century. This phase of European history was the rise of science, orientation of problem solving and the concept of the invisible hand and notion of the pin factor by Adam Smith. Adam Smith (1723-1790) had a similar view of human nature as others did, self-interested beings, but that was not his only view. He believed humans became extensions of machines in his most well known theory of Division of labor. In this work, Smith’s view of the state and economic life shapes his ideas of man.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Classical And Classical Economics

    1635 Words  | 4 Pages

    The two individuals were renowned economists of their time and their played a significant role in the shaping the modern economics. Alfred Marshall is renowned as the founder of neoclassical economics while Adam smith is regarded as the founder of classical economics, which promotes modern free market and division of labor. However, the two types of economics are quite different. The classical economics refers to the main economic paradigm existing in the 18th and 19th centuries (Altman 54). Classical economics is believed to have reached maturity during the works of John Stuart Mill as well as David Ricardo. The primary focus of classical economics theories included economic freedom, economic growth, ideas on laissez-faire and free competition. Contrarily, the neoclassical economics is an economics approach whose focus is on the determination of outputs, goods as well as income distribution in markets via demand and supply (Zafirovski 79). This paper seeks to compare and Contrast classical and neo-classical economy of Adam smith and Alfred Marshall

    Read More

More about Classical and Neoclassical Economists: Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes

Open Document