Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cold war and its effect
Cold war and its effect
Cold war and its effect
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cold war and its effect
The United States from the Cold War and into the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) continues to face challenges in translating military might into political desires due to its obsession with raising an army, electing politicians and assembling a diplomatic corp that continue to gravitate towards State-to-State engagements that if not rectified could lead to substantial delays in fighting terrorism and non-terrorist adversaries or worse total failure of the United States Military’s ability to properly carry out it’s politicians objectives due to being blindsided.
Although focusing on State-to-State actions met President Reagan’s intent of bringing down the Iron Curtain through the build up of military might, enhanced nuclear power and increasing America’s overall power projection along with America’s recent and contnued demonstration of it’s military and political might through removal of dictators and through nation building to stabilize regions and create examples of democracies where dictators used to stand while taking into account nuances such as religion, politcs, ethnicity and tribal affiliation to move closer to winning the Global War on Terror (GWOT), America faces challenges now with the GWOT as it did during the Cold War as it attempts to translate military might into political desires due to it's obsession with raising an army, electing politicians and assembling a diplomatic corp with a distinct gravity towards State-to-State engagements that if not rectified could lead to repeat challenges and even failure should this same collection of leaders fail to adjust their narrowly focused preoccupation with State-to-State level actions which does not fully account for how the military deploys to meet political objectives, ...
... middle of paper ...
...d the manner in which we now show terrorism, terrorist and terror organizations. The Iron Curtain of the Cold War rose as quickly as the WTC towers fell, but neither were really a surprise. They were in the periphery and not a primary focus area, but we should have see them coming. Who is David...the non-State agent, organization, or group that we are still not seeing because we’re still seeking a battle with another Goliath?
Works Cited
9/11 Five Years Later Lesson 10, Reading 1
Delleman, P. Lesson 6, Reading 8
Edwards, L. Lesson 7, Reading 5
Gardner, N Lesson 3 , Reading 4
Hawkins, W. Lesson 8, Reading 1
Jones, S. Lesson 11, Reading 2
Nitze, P. Lesson 7, Reading 2
NSCT Lesson 10, Reading 2
Petraeus, D. Lesson 9, Reading 4
Schaub, G. Lesson 7, Reading 3
US National Security Strategy Lesson 1, Reading 5
West, Bing Lesson 8, Reading 5
Steven Hook and John Spanier's 2012 book titled “American foreign policy since WWII" serves as one of the most important texts that can be used in understanding the underlying complexities on American foreign policies. Like the first readings that are analyzed in class (American Diplomacy by George Kennan and Surprise, Security, and the American Experience by John Lewis Gaddis), this text also brings history into a more understandable context. Aside from being informative and concise in its historical approach, Hook and Spanier also critiques the several flaws and perspectives that occurred in the American foreign policy history since World War II.
This historical study will compare and contrast the depiction of the “War on Terror” in a pro-government and anti-government plot structures found in Zero Dark Thirty (2012) by Kathryn Bigelow and The Siege (1998) by Edward Zwick. The pro-government view of Zero Dark Thirty defines the use of CIA agents and military operatives to track down Osama Bin Laden in the 2000s. Bigelow appears to validate the use of torture and interrogation as a means in which to extract information in the hunt for Bin Laden. In contrast this depiction of terrorism, Zwick’s film The Siege exposes the damage that torture, kidnapping, and
On the other hand, in The Slippery Slope to Preventive War, Neta Crawford questions the arguments put forward by the Bush administration and the National Security Strategy in regard to preemptive action and war. Crawford also criticizes the Bush administration as they have failed to define rogue states and terrorists as they have “blurred the distinction” between “the terrorists and those states in which they reside”. In Crawford’s point of view, taking the battle to the terrorists as self-defence of a preemptive nature along with the failure to distinguish between terrorist and rogue states is dangerous as “preventive war
In my paper "The undone change of American Foreign Policy after the Cold War" I addressed the inability of the U.S. institutions to meet the newly created challenges of the post-Cold War world. I argued that due to a lack of leadership, especially by the President, the opportunity to "reconfigure" U.S. foreign policy institutions; supported by an absent corresponding ideology; the U.S. had missed its chance to change its foreign policy in the post-Cold War world.
the terrorist, with the aim of wanting to protect and secure the lives of many more
The Soviet Union and the United States served as Allies during World War II. At the end of the war however each side wanted to deal with the aftermath differently. The United States was in favor of a peaceful and cooperative relationship with Germany and their Allies. The Soviet Union wanted revenge on the crimes and atrocities that were committed against them. The United States wanted to push democracy in Eastern Europe yet the Soviets countered this by saying the United States was hypocritical, since at that time the United States supported the Latin countries that were governed by dictatorships. The Soviets were under the impression that this was an effort to boost the UNITED STATES economy.
War. Humans have thrived from war for as long as we can remember. The United States has been fighting wars ever since we found the new country in North America that we now call the United States. We fought against our selves for the freedom of others. We fought in several world wars. We have always fought. But in the late 1940's “war” changed forever. This was well known as the Cold War. Why was this so different? “ The world had never experienced anything like it. The Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States was a half century of military build-up, political maneuvering for international support (Hanes, Sharon M., and Richard C. Hanes).” This means that the world has always seen war as either hand to hand combat or gun to gun combat. With soldiers and foot patrols, but this was basically an arms race. Who was to blame for this struggle? I believe that the Cold War was caused by both nations.
Therefore, while there is a disagreement over whether or not there is a new American way of war, the argument, in its entirety is not built on solid ground. The United States does not now, nor has it in the past, wage war with a specific method of combat. Additionally, those who persist in making the claim despite that fact both misrepresent the way that recent conflicts were fought and how the political object of a war effects how wars are fought. Thus, there is not a new American way of war, but rather a new, and perhaps ephemeral political object present in recent wars. It is a profound mistake to pigeonhole American policy and military tactics. Such an attempt fails to consider the different circumstances surrounding each individual war—and thus the necessity to adopt different means within each of them.
...viewer recognizes that agencies, such as the CIA, are valuable in the War on Terror for the data collecting they’re involved in. On examining of the film, the movie’s setting, agencies involved, and the subject matter targeted, the appropriate historical and social themes were connected to the plot. The circumstances in the film depicting the aftermath of September 11th attacks and the U.S. government’s role in tracking Osama Bin Laden were realistic. After the 9/11 attacks, Americans felt that radicalized Islamic groups and their leaders that encouraged these followers to attack America were enemies to their country. Therefore, the film didn’t have to have a poster of Al-Qaeda or Osama Bin Laden to be used as propaganda to make the point that the radicalized Islamic group was the enemy of the United States; this decision had already been made by the United States.
The United States of America is one of the most powerful countries in the world. This power is a direct result of the careful planning of policies that will govern the direction that the country goes. An effective defense policy is very important in assuring the safety of the citizens in the country and assuring a commanding position within the international community. In accordance, it is important that the United States should adopt a defense policy, so that they seek to form a coalition of strong allies in which they are the sole superpower so that in essence, they may control the whole international community. Before being able to actively pursue this defense policy and act powerful, we must make ourselves powerful. In the process of making ourselves powerful, we must carefully examine the existing threats to the country and this power that we want to have.
something that still gives cause for fear! A glimpse of a man that justifies the
Current military leadership should comprehend the nature of war in which they are engaged within a given political frame in order to develop plans that are coherent with the desired political end state. According to Clausewitz, war is an act of politics that forces an enemy to comply with certain conditions or to destroy him through the use of violence. A nation determines its vital interests, which drives national strategy to obtain or protect those interests. A country achieves those goals though the execution of one of the four elements of power, which are diplomatic, informational, military and economical means. The use of military force...
Herman, E. & Sullivan, G. O.1989. The Terrorism Industry: The Experts and Institutions That Shape Our View of Terror. New York: Pantheon.
In modern military theory, the highest level is the strategic level, in which activities at the strategic level focus directly on policy objectives, both during peace and warfare. In the study of modern military strategy, there is a distinction between military strategy and national strategy, in which the former is the use of military objective to secure political objectives and the latter coordinates and concentrates all the elements of national...
The concept of terrorism is exceedingly difficult to define. Author Gerald Seymour first said in his book Harry’s Game that, “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”. Each individual may view terrorism in a different light. Because of this, there is currently no universal definition of terrorism. However, in recent years, it has become increasingly more important to form a definition of terrorism, especially while working in the media.