The Most Dangerous Game Theme Analysis

629 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The analysis of the most dangerous game

The Most Dangerous Game Theme With animals when we track them down and kill them is called hunting, but when we do the same activities to humans it is unlawful and considered murder. Meanwhile we see a similar conflict in the short story The Most Dangerous Game written by Richard Connell. In the story the main character an extremely talented hunter, Rainsford, is on a yacht on his way to the Amazon for a dangerous hunt. Soon after the sailors spotted an island called Ship Trap Island Rainsford falls into the ocean and must swim to the island. While he was on the island he meets a man named General Zaroff, an experienced hunter. The theme of The Most Dangerous Game is morals and wrongful actions are in the eye of the beholder animals feel fear while being hunted, what is normal to you can be completely different from someone else’s idea of it, and joy doesn’t have identical meaning for everyone. Animals feel pain and fear while being hunted and injured. Whitney debated “even so, I rather think they [jaguars] understand one thing-fear. The fear of pain and the fear of death” (Connell 199). Whitney has an unpopular belief that jaguars, or any animals, feel pain. Whitney begins to question if hunting is as normal as it should be. He fathoms the thought that possibly animals feel terror much like the terror …show more content…

Rainsford stressed “Hunting? General Zaroff what you’re speaking of is murder” (Connell 206). General Zaroff believes that hunting humans is a challenge and difficult, but is not differently thought of morally than hunting. Rainsford completely disagrees, hunting is okay to him, but hunting humans is murder and terrible. Disagreements are common between others and most of the time it comes from a difference in morals and values. Zaroff and Rainsford have opposite views on what is right and wrong, so this shows morals are in the eye of the

Show More
Related

  • Was Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff

    339 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff. Rainsford is a hunter. He was on a yacht that crashed and he was the only survivor. The island that he swam to was named “Ship Trap Island.” This where General Zaroff lived. He is also a hunter. He has hunted anything you can think of. Even… people. He has the survivors from the ship wrecks “play” his “game.” The survivors go out into the jungle and General Zaroff goes out and finds them. They have three days to survive. If they don’t get caught in those three days, they win. If they lose… they are killed. This happened to Rainsford. Rainsford, thankfully, won the “game.” He shot General Zaroff after his win.

    Read More

  • Ender's Game Theme Analysis

    518 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ender’s Game, a book about futuristic war, betrayal, compassion, and friendship. It tells the story of Ender Wiggins, a boy who is sent to an army battle camp when he is only six years old. Ender learns independence and creates friends as well as enemies as he learns to fight for the sake of humankind. Ender goes through a lot of struggles as a young boy, and in the end, learns to accept and learn from it. In the book Ender’s Game, Mr. Card uses conflict to send the message that growing up in pain can lead to a hardworking but dangerous lifestyle.

    Read More

  • Is Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff

    169 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the short story “the most dangerous game”, Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff.

    Read More

  • Rainsford Justified In The Most Dangerous Game

    217 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game”, Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff. Rainsford is a hunter. He was on a yacht until he fell off the boat. He swam all the way to shore because Rainsford heard three gun shots. He walked upon a gigantic mansion. This house was for a man named General Zaroff. He was an hunter just like Rainsford in a hunt , but hunted humans instead of animals. General Zaroff wanted to kill Rainsford in a hunt with the General. Also, the General threaten Rainsford if he doesn’t hunt with him; he will be sent with Ivan.

    Read More

  • Robert Rainsford The Most Dangerous Game Quotes

    401 Words  | 1 Pages

    Robert Rainsford from “The Most Dangerous Game” is a very open character. He always shows what he’s thinking verbally or just with facial expressions. When he landed on Ship-Trap island and was lost in the woods, he found a pathway. “They pointed along the cliff in the direction he had been going.” Rainsford’s attitude toward the pathway is what brought him and General Zaroff together. Rainsford had the opportunity to just not follow the hunting boot tracks and walk down a different trail but then the story would never have ended the same. “‘Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer.’ ‘Dear me,’ said the general, quite unruffled, ‘again that unpleasant word. But I think I can show you that your scruples are quite ill founded.’”This quote signifies the start of conflict for the two characters.

    Read More

  • Are Characters from The Most Dangerous Game Civilized?

    683 Words  | 2 Pages

    When General Zaroff is first introduced in the story, it appears that he is a civilized person. It is not until you read farther into the story that you begin to see why he is quite the opposite. While having dinner with Rainsford, General Zaroff explains to him that, while he used to hunt big game animals, it had begun to bore him. None of the game provided a challenge to Zaroff anymore. He came up with another way to get the thrill of hunting, while finding something that would keep it interesting and challenging. Zaroff decided to hunt humans.

    Read More

  • How Is Irony Used In The Most Dangerous Game

    964 Words  | 2 Pages

    Did you know even though nature can be beautiful it can sometimes be deadly. In The Most Dangerous Game, Rainsford begins to see the awe-instilling power of nature and how it can hurt us. The Most Dangerous Game Written by Richard Connell is a story about the dangers of nature and the ethical question of if we should kill animals. Connell uses irony to instill a question in the mind of the reader”Is killing animals moral?” In “The Most Dangerous Game,”Richard Connell uses a flip between man and animal to convey irony in the story while also using the dangerous environment of the Island to show suspense.

    Read More

  • Human Interaction with Nature in the Works of Aldo Leopold and Elizabeth Bishop

    1697 Words  | 4 Pages

    person’s contact with a wild animal comes about through hunting. In theory, hunting is a

    Read More

  • The Most Dangerous Game Tone

    739 Words  | 2 Pages

    The setting is an important piece of any story. The setting can help paint a clear picture in order to establish what the characters are feeling as well as setting the tone of story. In the following stories, “The Destructors” and “The Most Dangerous Game,” Graham Greene and Richard Connell demonstrate the tone of the story by using Old Misery’s house and General Zaroff’s Chateau as the main focal point. While the two stories present differences in the tone of the setting, they both make a connection of the beauty that these two places possess. Greene uses Old Misery’s house to formulate the story that prepares the reader of how a post-war building and surroundings can have an effect on people’s behavior and feelings while Connell uses General Zaroff’s Chateau in a way to deceive the reader from what is really happening in the jungle of Ship Trap Island.

    Read More

  • The Benefits of Hunting and Trapping

    2330 Words  | 5 Pages

    The killing of Zimbabwe's most well-known and much-photographed lion, affectionately named Cecil, ignited a firestorm of controversy and debate. This essay will explore hunting and trapping, both play key roles in maintaining a balance in the animal kingdom. Both sports have been a tradition since the beginning of mankind. Men needed to hunt and trap to feed their families and stay alive. For some people that is still true today and others it is a hobby that has become a passion.

    Read More

  • Animal Cruelty and Interpersonal Violence

    2006 Words  | 5 Pages

    Ascione’s (1993) definition of animal cruelty is defined as “socially unacceptable behavior that intentionally causes unnecessary pain, suffering, or distress to and/or death of an animal” exclusive of socially condoned behavior, such as legal hunting and certain agricultural and veterinary practices. Not all violent individuals have been previously cruel to animals but studies have shown that a great number of them have exhibited this behavior. A great majority of the literature calls for a better understandin...

    Read More

  • Anti-Hunters Vs Anti Hunters Essay

    1670 Words  | 4 Pages

    Anti-hunters are opposed to the explicit acts of hunters in Africa because of the environmental degradation it can lead to. What I want to be of focus, though, is that controversy over the act of hunting is not solely in line with hunting endangered African mammals. The results of all kinds of hunts and the drives hunters have to pursue these hunts differ because of the uniqueness of the goods the hunters seek in their adventures. What non-hunters and anti-hunters easily overlook is the anthropocentric values that the hunter seeks to fulfill and achieve, and how it expresses an interaction with nature.

    Read More

  • The Meaning and Symbolism of the Hunting Scenes in Sir Gawain and The Green Knight

    2688 Words  | 6 Pages

    all the hunted animals convey connotations of evil, and this is doubtless the reason why the author of the poem seems so involved in the outcome of the hunts and never tires of triumphantly describing the final slaying of the pursued animals. (Howard 85)

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Sharing Pain By Haraway

    1441 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although the chapter is occasionally hard to follow, Haraway successfully demonstrates an empathetic response to animals suffering due the actions of humans subjecting them to research. She uses arguments to support her views that animals should be regarded as co-workers rather than objects that simply react and are dispensable. She looks at the different perspectives of the act of killing between animals and humans, and states “The problem is actually to understand that human beings do not get a pass on the necessity of killing significant others, who are them-selves responding, not just reacting” (Haraway 2007, 80). This view is unique in comparison to what society commonly believes, so reading this chapter was both enlightening and interesting. Despite the interesting ideas and arguments that Haraway communicates, the chapter often has run on sentences and unnecessarily lengthy words, such as ‘multiplicitous’ (Haraway 2007, 80). This often made the chapter hard to read and therefor difficult to digest. This can, however, be seen as a fault of my own. My final thoughts on chapter 3 of ‘When Species Meet’ is that the extensive research that Haraway underwent proved effective when supporting her argument and, in turn, created a thought compelling and respectable piece of

    Read More

  • Animal Cruelty: Educating to Eliminate

    1451 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some people do not consider certain acts of animal cruelty to be cruelty or they do not care. Normally the people who think like that are the ones who are actually causing the animal abuse themselves. Animal abusers sometimes do not see any wrong in what they are doing because they do not care what the animals feel. They do not think if the animals are happy or being hurt, they just continue doing what they are doing because to them it is not cruelty towards the animal. Some, though, do not believe that t...

    Read More

More about The Most Dangerous Game Theme Analysis

Open Document