Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sports impact on academics
Benefit of sport to education
Sports impact on academics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sports impact on academics
A recent, yet controversial, the discussion has come up that sports should be taken away from schools. Studies have shown that numerous districts have gone bankrupt trying to support the athletics program. Therefore, schools should eliminate sports to save money, give students a chance to improve their academic performance and reduce injuries that students may pick up from sports. Some students put more effort into sports, instead of school, and that can affect the student’s academic performance. In a 2015 investigation conducted by Amanda Ripley, she asked a couple of exchange students what they thought of school sports, one said, “It was amazing to see how school wasn't just about the grades. In my home country, school is just for learning” (Ripley 1). More specifically, Amanda Ripley states, “In the world's smartest countries, school is about learning”, which means that she is trying to say that sports interfere with a student's academic performance (Ripley 1). This information should be recognized, because students put hard effort into these sports, get injured, or sometimes get nothing out of it when they could be using that time to focus on their academic’s. These are great ways to have a great future, also known as riding on the …show more content…
According to Amanda Ripley, it states that a Premont, Texas high school was threatened to be shut down because of financial complications (Ripley 10). “As a solution, Superintendent Ernest Singleton made a brave move by canceling all the sports”, and by doing this, the district realized that they could save $150,000 in one year (Ripley 11). Sports can cause a great deal of financial frustration, and this information shows when the problem was addressed, the results came back looking positive. The evidence is clear, sports can cost more money than districts may have, which is a problem that can be easily
Over the course of time, schools have invested all their finances on sports like football. Primarily, the sport had initiated as a form of recreational fun, but therefore lead into a trend. This popular trend later spread into competitiveness and in some schools, even idolized. At Premont High School, a small school in Texas, it was threatening to be shut down for the neglection of academics and a misuse of finance. All money funded was focused on being used to support all sports and the money raised, was a large amount of money. The solution was to suspend all sports and with that, changes were made. Teachers were retrained, the curriculum was raised to the appropriate standard, and too much avail, academics improved significantly. According to the article, when sports have been dominating, only 50 percent of the students were passing their classes. After changes were made, 80 percent were now passing. The author argues that with the suspension of sports, academics would be at a higher level than they are. With this argument, I agree with Ripley’s motion to cancel all sports. To many students, such as myself, it may seem irrational and absurd at first, but realistically it is a reasonable solution. Tons of money is being spent primarily to a sport and most times, aren't even at a winning season. Sports should not the prime focus. Schools are not instituted to emphasis on sports
One piece of evidence is from scholastic news magazine, “Should Schools Get Rid of Sports” “A 2013 report from the Institute of Medicine, physically and active kids have more focus, are better problem solvers and score higher on tests.” Also from the scholastic news magazine, “Should Schools Get Rid of Sports” it states, “A 2012 study by the Datalys Center found that young athletes have higher scores on math and english than those who don't participate in sports.” And finally from scholastic news magazine, “Should Schools Get Rid of Sports” is says, “Today studies show that schools with big athletic programs tend to have lower dropout rates.” If we want these kind of academics we could bring back school sports. In conclusion, even though sports cut down school budgets they are a big tradition to school. “If you don't go to school, you can't play sports.”-Scott
Sports are a crucial part of an individual 's character. Counter arguments made against having sports at schools are getting more and more public. The arguments make people, think again about having students play sports. Sports are useful because they give players skills they can use on and off the field: strength, leadership, and confidence.
Amanda Ripley argues in The Atlantic in her article “The Case Against High School Sports”, that the United States place too much attention on sports rather than academics. Ripley argues that sports programs at schools should be reduced, maybe even cut out completely. She states that there are a lot of countries that outperform America on international tests, and it is because they put more of their emphasis on academics, where the United States puts more of an emphasis on athletics. Ripley says that high school sports negatively affects academics. (1). I disagree with Ripley on this topic; I think that sports are important for young kids because it teaches them very valuable life lessons and it keeps them out of trouble.
Throughout school I was never really athletic. While I excelled in all my academic and artistic classes, I barely scraped by in gym class. My parents forced me to join soccer and cheerleading as a child, in hopes that I would find something I was good at, but I would complain about it until, ultimately, they’d allow me to quit. Needless to say, I never really understood the fuss about high school sports. In Amanda Ripley’s article, “The Case Against High School Sports,” she argues that the craze over high school sports may actually be harming American school systems.
Athletics in American schools have always been controversial for many reasons. Some of these reasons include health concerns, safety precautions, and academic significance. Daniel H. Bowen and Colin Hitt wrote an article titled, “High-School Sports Aren’t Killing Academics” to present the factors of positive correlation between success in athletics and academics. I believe that athletics in high schools not only benefit students socially, but also academically.
Sports are the downgrade of society and should be ultimately removed. We would like to propose the removal of sports at our school. Sports distract people from school, cause serious injuries, and give kids false hope of college scholarships. If we don’t remove sports from our school it could cause our future generation to not be able to obtain a proper education and be successful in their future. If we don’t take sports out of our school, then there will be more problems with our kids health and their lives.
School funding cannot be solely to blame for the decrease in physical activity in the education environment. With the increased emphasis on the need to achieve academic aptitude, children as well as their adult parents see athletics as an extra, or something that can be done when and if homework is completed. Not to say that this is not commendable, but evidence supports the fact that athletic programs have the ability to turn at-risk youth in positive directions. Sports programs promote healthy social and physical development while offering positive alternatives to high risk behavior.
Over time and especially today, there has been a common misconception that students who participate in athletics or team sports are more likely to be less accomplished (in terms of academic success) than those students who are not and John R. Gerdy’s “Americas Failed Experiment with Elite Athletics” is a prime example of this false belief. Teachers and faculty members often devalue athletics and some even feel that it is a poor representation of such. Often time’s parents or guardians are reluctant or in opposition to allowing their children to get involved in sports because they believe it will derail their learning and/or achievement in school. The majority of those people who presume
For quite sometime sports have been a big part of schools; however, many people think it is time to get rid of them. Studies have shown that athletic activities at schools are starting to get kids to have bad grades because they are so attracted to sports they don’t pay attention to school. Therefore, schools should no longer have sports because it gives students more time to study and pay attention in class, saves money for classroom activities and work, and gives the schools time to repair classes.
Imagine yourself sprinting across the gridiron towards the end zone, cradling the football in your hands. Sweat trickles down your face and fatigue starts to kick in. A burly defender charges towards you, and your brain screams at you to evade the tackle. Spinning past him, you continue your unstoppable run. Inches away from the end zone, you conduct a celebratory dive. Touchdown! It’s moments like these that many kids across the country experience as they play the beautiful sport of football. Why would anyone want to prevent their children from experiencing these emotional moments? Parents should not be the ones to dictate whether their child is authorized to play football or not, but instead, the kids should have that decision. Football provides youngsters with an opportunity to get exercise and obtain its physical benefits, and the sport also enhances their concentration, makes them better problem solvers, and helps them succeed in school.
Metzl, Jordan D., and Carol Shookhoff. "Playing Sports Benefits Children." Child Athletes, edited by Christine Watkins, Greenhaven Press, 2008. At Issue. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ3010487202/OVIC?u=pub_ovrc&xid=df3755ce. Accessed 29 Mar. 2017. Originally published in The Young Athelete: A Sports Doctor's Complete Guide for Parents, Little, Brown and Company, 2002.
Because these schools don’t have enough money to provide the resources to educate their students, it is likely they are unable to expend funds on sports activities. This results in sports programs being cut first, right behind music and art. Since many of these programs offer a way for adolescents to escape reality, it is a necessity that we fund these programs. Sports programs are a way for adolescents to experience physical skill development and critical
Sports programs have been an integral part of all schools. They support the academics of the school and therefore foster success in life. These programs are educational and help produce productive citizenship. They help students experience and build skills that may help them in their future, like interpersonal and time management skills. Education may kindle the light of knowledge, but sports help to maintain the proper physique. Sports are also an important means of entertainment and a use for energy after long hours of study. Sports increase a student’s performance not only in the classroom but also in their life.
Sport at school should NOT be compulsory. Sports training and PE take up time that could be better spent learning other subjects, and PE and Sport are not as important as other subjects like maths, science etc. It is also my belief that it students should have the right to choose whether or not we do sport/PE, because we are allowed to choose the subjects that are more important, so why are we not allowed to choose whether or not we do sport?Every year in PE, we do the same sports and the same practice drills, so after year 7, there is no point continuing to do PE, because the you are just doing the same things that you have done in previous years. 2 periods per cycle are spent on PE, 2 periods which could be spent on subjects like foreign languages, which are only allocated 4 periods per cycle or English or Science, which get 5 periods per cycle.