More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of sports on education
What are the positive effects sport has on education
Impact of sports on academic achievement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For quite sometime sports have been a big part of schools; however, many people think it is time to get rid of them. Studies have shown that athletic activities at schools are starting to get kids to have bad grades because they are so attracted to sports they don’t pay attention to school. Therefore, schools should no longer have sports because it gives students more time to study and pay attention in class, saves money for classroom activities and work, and gives the schools time to repair classes.
If sports were cut down then schools would have more high school graduation rates. According to Amanda Ripley's article about sports at schools she says ¨Distractions however may be the greatest cost of all (11).¨ That means that students are focused on sports and not academics so they get bad grades in school which causes them to drop out (Ripley 11). This gives a good reason on why sports should go because it causes students to get As on the field, but Fs on their homework and tests by not paying attention to school and
…show more content…
According to Ripley's article, a Superintendent named, Ernest Singleton got rid of sports and said that he realized by suspending sports the district could save about $150,000 (11). Also, she says that maintaining a grass football field can cost more than $20,000 a year in funds, new bleachers are half a million dollars, they have to pay for buses, hotel rooms, meals for away games, but for home games they pay for security and to paint the lines for the field that averages out to be about a million dollars (Ripley 11). That school principal made the right choice because saving tons of money is the best decision he could have. Also by suspending sports it would save even more than 150,000 dollars it saves about a million dollars that could go and fund the extra classes that they had to cut for
Over the course of time, schools have invested all their finances on sports like football. Primarily, the sport had initiated as a form of recreational fun, but therefore lead into a trend. This popular trend later spread into competitiveness and in some schools, even idolized. At Premont High School, a small school in Texas, it was threatening to be shut down for the neglection of academics and a misuse of finance. All money funded was focused on being used to support all sports and the money raised, was a large amount of money. The solution was to suspend all sports and with that, changes were made. Teachers were retrained, the curriculum was raised to the appropriate standard, and too much avail, academics improved significantly. According to the article, when sports have been dominating, only 50 percent of the students were passing their classes. After changes were made, 80 percent were now passing. The author argues that with the suspension of sports, academics would be at a higher level than they are. With this argument, I agree with Ripley’s motion to cancel all sports. To many students, such as myself, it may seem irrational and absurd at first, but realistically it is a reasonable solution. Tons of money is being spent primarily to a sport and most times, aren't even at a winning season. Sports should not the prime focus. Schools are not instituted to emphasis on sports
My first reason is schools should not get rid of sports because private and club sports are too expensive for most families. According to the scholastic news magazine, “Should Schools Get Rid of Sports” it states, “If we cut back school sports, some kids will find themselves shut out of sports completely. Yes, club sports-that is, private leagues outside of school-would be an option for some, but fees, equipment, and travel
Sports are a crucial part of an individual 's character. Counter arguments made against having sports at schools are getting more and more public. The arguments make people, think again about having students play sports. Sports are useful because they give players skills they can use on and off the field: strength, leadership, and confidence.
Amanda Ripley argues in The Atlantic in her article “The Case Against High School Sports”, that the United States place too much attention on sports rather than academics. Ripley argues that sports programs at schools should be reduced, maybe even cut out completely. She states that there are a lot of countries that outperform America on international tests, and it is because they put more of their emphasis on academics, where the United States puts more of an emphasis on athletics. Ripley says that high school sports negatively affects academics. (1). I disagree with Ripley on this topic; I think that sports are important for young kids because it teaches them very valuable life lessons and it keeps them out of trouble.
Athletics in American schools have always been controversial for many reasons. Some of these reasons include health concerns, safety precautions, and academic significance. Daniel H. Bowen and Colin Hitt wrote an article titled, “High-School Sports Aren’t Killing Academics” to present the factors of positive correlation between success in athletics and academics. I believe that athletics in high schools not only benefit students socially, but also academically.
They don't think about paying for the sport they are going to play. This can make students second-guess themselves about playing and make them not want to play their sport. Schools should want more and more students to play sports. These reasons are terrible for students to stay in active and not play any sports. “Taxpayers are saying, ‘Let’s get rid of sports. We don’t have to pay for them,’ School boards are saying ‘Hey, it’s not mandatory to offer these programs.’ What we’re saying is, ‘Well, we still have something to offer that is very important in this country.’” (Popke, 2007, p. xx). Sports teach to students a lot in their life, it's a great deal of responsibility. So when students aren't playing sports they can be missing out on important lessons in their life. “While these programs are important to the students’ educational growth, the bills inevitably add up.”(Cerling & Herman, 2007, p.
The average family spends $100-$500 a month on sports. People have been doing sports for ever. Some people would be very angry if schools decided to get rid of them. Sports are dangerous though. They are causing parents to pressure their kids, students are becoming sleep deprived, and they are dangerous even though they can be healthy in some ways. Youth sports are harmful to students because they can be parents are pressuring their kids, they are dangerous, and many students are becoming sleep deprived.
After reading " The Case Against High School Sports" by Amanda Ripley started to make me think. There were many strong points about how the priorities of the sports are beginning to be more important to students than their education. Another great point was that the financing and budgeting is unfairly distributed throughout school districts and is spent more on athletics and clubs and not enough on classes. And I Believe that schools should put certain restrictions on the spending and promoting or in school sports and clubs because of the major drop in national and world comparisons.
Many schools don’t support the need of sports in sixth grade which has some negative and positive factors to it. Sports affect many students in a positive way like me; it brings joy to our faces. Today, sixth graders have engaged in sports in non-school, but community sports because students aren’t allowed to get involved in school functioned sports. Fort Bend ISD has banned sixth graders to be involved in any such sport because how “young” they are. I consider FBISD should allow sixth graders having sports.Quite a few students enjoy being part of a team, learning, being physically active. While it is the view of those sports may distract students from academics allowing them to participate in school functions sports will benefit to get better grades, build character, and create anthecentive for exercise.
For decades, students have been in school sports; however, they are experiencing a drop in their grades as well. After school activities can cost districts’ a great deal of money and they interfere with students’ time to study. Therefore, school sports shouldn’t be allowed, to save districts’ thousands of dollars a year, help students score better academically, and America will not lag behind other countries in academics.
People think that high school athletes gain lifetime benefits. Having sports and an education would be better than just having to learn all school hours. Having sports and an education at the say time would be less frustration, exhaustion, and a lack of time, because for some students sports is a release of stress. The more students attend sports or clubs or just any other activity at school the better they have to get better jobs, with better pay, and those benefits last a lifetime. Sports would make the school more fun, without a doubt, because of the school spirit and all the support.it would
Do you think we should have sports or take them away from schools? I think that people shouldn't take away sports because it keeps them healthier when they run around and get exercise.Also it can help you be a good leader to other people when you tell your teammates how to play a certain way.Last it helps kids with stress when you have a test in class and when you play it can calm you down.Kids should be able to play sports because It keeps them healthy, It can help you be a good leader to other people,and Helps with stress. In my opinion I think that they shouldn't take away sports from schools because it keeps them healthy. In the text it says,“stepping away from you books for softball practice
The distraction of after school sports can be avoided easily by making the bold decision of shutting the sports down. Although many say sports are needed; numerous people believe that after school athletics are a distraction which results in students’ failing grades. Therefore, schools should get rid of after class sports because athletics teams are too expensive, students will receive higher grades, and learners will have extra time to
Many would disagree with me and say that high school sports actually have more benefits than negativities for a student. For example a student in sports would be more active which would make them fitter and healthier. A student that in a team sport would make more friends which would improve their social skills and increase their
Sport at school should NOT be compulsory. Sports training and PE take up time that could be better spent learning other subjects, and PE and Sport are not as important as other subjects like maths, science etc. It is also my belief that it students should have the right to choose whether or not we do sport/PE, because we are allowed to choose the subjects that are more important, so why are we not allowed to choose whether or not we do sport?Every year in PE, we do the same sports and the same practice drills, so after year 7, there is no point continuing to do PE, because the you are just doing the same things that you have done in previous years. 2 periods per cycle are spent on PE, 2 periods which could be spent on subjects like foreign languages, which are only allocated 4 periods per cycle or English or Science, which get 5 periods per cycle.