Slippery Slope Examples

Throughout the film there were several different instances of logical fallacies that included slippery slope, and ad populum. The use of interviews involving slippery slope were noticeable from the onset of the film. It could be seen in Kelly Bolar, Joe Papp, and other interviews. The objective of including stories that used slippery slope and seemed unrealistic was to demonstrate how it could happen to the most unexpected crowd. Furthermore, the use of slippery slope assisted the audience in feeling the importance of lying on lives. The argument was slightly unsteady because they included many examples of overstated lying that does not occur to most people in their lives. Another example of a fallacy used was ad populum. The experiments that

Moreover, this strengthened the argument because after several experiments on the subject it had been shown that this does occur in the population. The use of rhetorical strategies, fallacies, and filming techniques presented to the watcher was very strong through the use of so much evidence to back up the claim that states everyone lies. It’s was an effective argument because they had data from around the world, and the idea that everyone has their own “fudge factor” that doesn’t automatically group the audience into one category. Although this was a strong argument it may not have an ramification on some of the population that watched it. Consequently, this may be because they didn’t show enough examples of light lies in someone’s life, and they mostly focused on the aspect of cheating. A strong element this film used was that it did not just base the information gained off America, but across the world. This was beneficial to the film because it eliminates a foreigners claim that the information presented was only demonstrated in America. Because of this the credibility expanded. Another strong element was the fact that they didn’t