Should history teachers teach that the Holocaust happened and that it didn't
happen? If not, then why should science teachers teach that life evolved over billions of
years, and that it was created as it is now just six thousand years ago? Creationism should
not be taught in science class because it has no supporting evidence, it is not equal to
evolution, and religious myths can not be taught in public schools in an officially non
religious nation.
"...[I]ndividual scientists and philosophers of science have provided substantive
critiques of "intelligent design," demonstrating significant conceptual flaws in its
formulation, a lack of credible scientific evidence, and misrepresentations of scientific
facts."(AAAS). This statement says that creationism has no evidence for its claims, and
by saying that it is science is a disgrace to the scientific method. This statement was
released by the largest scientific organization in the world. Reasonably, for something to
be taught in science class it should have sufficient scientific evidence, and it should be
accepted by the greater scientific community. Evolution meets these criteria. It is an
evidentiary fact in science, just like all other facts of biology, physics, chemistry, etc. It
has overwhelming evidence for it, and it can not be reasonably disputed.
"...[W]e want to see students know that true science confirms the Creation account
in Genesis and that molecules-to-man evolution is a blind-faith belief that flies in the face
of much scientific evidence..."(Answers in Genesis). Ken Ham, the president of AiG-US,
says that evolution is "blind-faith," meaning it has no evidence, and that creationism is
proven by "true scienc...
... middle of paper ...
...ve what they want, teach themselves what they want, but they do not have
the right to teach the children of the public a totally false explanation on the origins and
continuation of life and the universe.
Works Cited
"AAAS Board Resolution on Intelligent Design Theory." AAAS. N.p., 2002. Web. 7 Nov 2010. .
Ham, Ken. "Creation in public schools?!." answers in genesis. N.p., 2002. Web. 7 Nov 2010.
Mills, Cynthia. The Theory of Evolution. John Wiley & Sons , 2004. 148. Print.
"Open Letter To Kansas School Board." Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. N.p., n.d. Web. 7 Nov 2010. .
"theory." Random House Dictionary. Random House, Inc, 2010. Web.
.
Templeton, David. The. “Is evolution missing a link in some Pennsylvania high schools”. McClatchy Tribute Business.
Many people are inclined to say why would science even wish to peruse this method of research? Lewis Thomas says in his essay "The Hazards of Science" It would seem to me a more unnatural thing and more of an offense against nature for us to come on the same scene endowed... ... middle of paper ... ... J. Michael Bishop states that "The price of science seems large, but to reject science is to deny the future.
"Www.creationism.org - Info Box - Top Bar." Www.creationism.org - Info Box - Top Bar. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 May 2014.
In the United States, the average child goes through public funded schools that have a basic curriculum. According to the Texas Education Agency, some of the subjects include science, mathematics, social studies, English, and more. Nowhere in the subject is religion included. The basic curriculum is made in order to give students skills, knowledge, and to help develop the minds of the future. In science class, evolution is taught either briefly or detailed. It is taught because it is a popular theory that did not seem to choose a certain religion. So why believe that religion and science can be taught together? The evolution of Earth and the universe can be believed in any way an individual chooses.
A hotly debated topic these past few years centers on the origin of life. Now more than ever, science and religion are butting heads trying to come up with a conclusion, and one that public schools would teach to their students. Alex Rainert, meanwhile, reasons that both “science and religion are engaged in the same project, to discover the origin of life” (141). In short, one could better describe the debate as a crusade between evolutionists and creationists. Both sides have their well-founded arguments, but when one looks at the decisions of the courts, clearly only one side may win the battle when deciding biology curriculum in schools. Despite the overwhelming number of people in favor of teaching creationism in public schools, it may be better to leave science classes free from matters of religious belief.
The Scopes Trial, formally known as The State of Tennessee vs. Scopes but given the nickname “The Monkey Trial”, has been credited as starting the popular legal dispute between evolution and creationism in the court, and its impact in the 20’s was immeasurable. The interpretation of the case is just as popular, if not more, than the actual result of the case. The worldwide attention and media coverage the case received produced many opinions. Scholar’s opinions range from describing the case as an irrelevancy and a good show to describing it as a “Watershed in American religious history” (Ronald L. Numbers, 1998, p. 76).
Since the time that teaching evolution in public schools was banned as heresy and taboo for contradicting the Bible, most public school systems today take an opposite approach in which creationism is seldom ta...
Prohibiting School Prayer Threatens Religious Liberty. Civil Liberties. Ed. James D. Torr. -. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2003.
Evolutionists said that a fish called Coelacanth had died out 70 million years ago, yet fossils of this fish were found in rocks which were supposed to that old, but none in ‘younger’ rocks. They then said that it was becoming an amphibian and would evolve legs, 13 years later another Coelacanth was caught again and again. The theory had been ruined, this occurred too for Tuatara’s, sea lilies, cockroaches and many other organisms. source creation
...ical. Next the McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education had a law that enforced public schools to give both creation-science and evolution equal treatment. It was said that “Creation-Science” is not actually a science, but strictly religious.
Even though, science it all about proven facts, people see past that and all they care about is what has not been proven. All society
The biggest legal reason that creationism should not be taught is in the constitutions first amendment which states Church and State must remain separate. Many creationist tried to pass laws to get both creationism, and evolutionism taught within a science course. Having said that the Supreme Court still found it unconstitutional on multiple occasions. As it was not teaching to inform, but creationism was being taught in the hopes of promoting creationism, and such God. Evolution does not require creationism to work, but creationism does require some evolution to be evident as previously stated from the intelligent design theorists.
In 1982, in McLean v Arkansas Board of Education, a federal district court ruled that "creation science" is religion, and in 1987, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that in Edwards v Aguillard, ruling that "creationism" could not be taught in the public schools. Speculate on the reasoning behind these
Evolution views life to be a process by which organisms diversified from earlier forms, whereas creation illustrates that life was created by a supernatural being. Creation and evolution both agree on the existence of microevolution and the resemblance of apes and humans but vary in terms of interpreting the origins of the life from a historical standpoint. A concept known as Faith Vs Fact comprehensively summarizes the tone of this debate, which leads to the question of how life began. While creation represents a religious understanding of life, evolution acknowledges a scientific interpretation of the origins of life. The theory is illustrated as the process by which organisms change species over time.
University of Michigan. “Religion in Schools: A look at how religious practices influence education.” .