Null Hypothesis

649 Words2 Pages

Claims and Hypotheses Claim 1 The number of battery electric cars in the city is 10%. In this case, the population comprises battery electric cars in the city. These cars have an electric motor that runs on electricity stored in batteries (CEPA, n.d.). Null Hypothesis Based on the claim, the null hypothesis is H0: The number of battery electric cars in the city is 10%. Notably, the claim forms H0 because it contains the equality sign (Triola, 2012). In symbolic form, we express the null hypothesis as H0: p = 10%. Alternative Hypothesis The alternative hypothesis for the claim is H1: The number of battery electric cars in the city is not 10%. In symbolic form, we express the alternative hypothesis as H1: p ≠ 10%. Initial Conclusion Assuming that the test statistic does not exceed the critical …show more content…

Final Conclusion There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the proportion of female adults attending the various movie theatres in the city is 50%. (Triola, 2012). Claim 3 The number of homes that use solar energy in the state is less than 25%. Null Hypothesis In this case, the claim does not have an equality condition. We express the null hypothesis as H0: The number of homes that use solar energy in the state is 25%. In symbolic form, we express the null hypothesis as H0: p = 25%. Alternative Hypothesis The claim forms the alternative hypothesis, which is H1: The number of homes that use solar energy in the state is less than 25%. In symbolic form, we express the alternative hypothesis as H1: p < 25%. Initial Conclusion While assuming that the test statistic is less than the critical value, the initial conclusion is to reject H0. Final Conclusion The sample data supports the claim that the number of homes that use solar energy in the state is less than 25% (Triola, 2012). Claim

Open Document