Minority Representation In Special Education Summary

792 Words2 Pages

A detailed study on the article entitled “Is Disproportionally High Minority Representation in Special Education a School Problem?” reveals the concern of the differences that are seen in the representation of minority factions in the special education agenda against that of the common core syllabus in educational institutions. The article explains how the U.S. Federal policies helps different school districts and states institute strategies to avoid this disproportionality and to initiate efforts to lessen the current disproportion problems. Nevertheless to say, much of the terminologies used to explain this regulation is ambiguous and thus the states get powers to interpret and enforce the same as per their specific requirements. This often …show more content…

Fergus reaches this conclusion after organizing a study for many years at about 30 school districts. He collected all available data and the detailed scrutiny of the data gives some insight to evaluate the reasons for the disproportionality issue. The study shows that there are void spaces to be filled up in the core syllabus and in many of the teaching methodologies. The research identified that when the syllabus changed too frequently and to a great extent, the students show a tendency to be upgraded to the new system. Often children with learning disabilities suffer a lot in such situations. Their limited resources make it extremely difficult to cope up with the frequently changing methodologies. In most of the cases the teachers are not aware about how to resolve and avoid disproportionality from arising in the classroom. Another prominent finding made by the study is the defect in the steadiness of the pre-referral procedure adopted in school education system. In many a times during the study, the overuse of data sheets and files reduced the acceptability of the process and made it perplexing and unproductive. It has also been noted that many teachers often underestimate their students’ capabilities. This is more evident in their approach towards racial minority groups who emerge from low income strata of the society. However, Fergus thinks that …show more content…

He thinks that the unavailability of basic needs, bad peer influence, problems to identify a livelihood affects the emotional stability and personality development of a child. A struggling parent is what the child sees around and that affects the mindset of the child herself. The child eventually gets poor chances to be educated well and most probably the kid ends up with some sort of learning disabilities. Richard Rothstein explains that the theories of Fergus are mere “racist” sort of interpretation of the real problems faced by children due to economic instability. He suggested that Fergus’ arguments are more focused on blaming the schools for the issue rather than addressing the core issues. Rothstein tries to explain that the socio-cultural peer influence has an equal or even magnified role to play while addressing the issue. He thus argues that instructors or the school authorities cannot resolve this issue alone and that public leaders need to take initiative to make progress in the society to make the situation better in every

Open Document