Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

510 Words2 Pages

The Verbal Fight For The People's Support
We have all tried to convince someone that we are right and another person's wrong.Sometimes you win and sometimes you lose it all depends on how strong your argument is. Other times you're even trying to win over a crowd like in a debate. Well in the tragedy Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare Antony and Brutus both give a speech to the people of Rome trying to convince them to side with either Brutus or Antony. Antony says the murder of Caesar was not justified and Brutus thinks it was. Mark Antony gave a more effective funeral speech than Brutus.
Antony uses pathos to make a strong argument against brutus. “The most unkindest cut of all; For when the noble Ceaser saw him stab, Ingratitude, more strong than traitors’ arms, Quite vanquished him. Then burst his mighty heart;” (1253). Antony is using emotional appeal to use the audiences anger to fuel his movement against brutus. He points of that Caesar's best friend killed killed him and when Caesar realised Brutus stab him it hurt more emotionally than physically. He also uses pathos when he reads Caesar's will, showing them he generously donated money and land to the roman citizens. Some may say Brutus uses …show more content…

“He hath brought many captives to Rome, Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept; Ambition should be made of sterner stuff” (Shakespeare 1250-1251). Antony is using logic to explain that if Caesar was ambitious he would of taken the money for himself. Also Antony states that if Caesar was ambitious he would of taken the crown, yet he denied it three times. Critics could say that Brutus also used logic when he said that Caesar would turn them into slaves. But there was no evidence to support his claim. Antony supported his argument with logic in a way the crowd could understand and relate

Open Document