Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Anthony

500 Words1 Page

Persuasion techniques are used every day without realizing. During an argument, many people use logics, ethics, and pathos, but not intentionally. These persuasion techniques are unquestionably successful: and therefore a great choice for Marc Antony. Marc Antony used three main persuasion tactics, ethos, pathos, and logos respectively. These tactics are what ultimately changed a mourning group of commoners into an angry mob.
One of the ways that Antony turned a mourning group into a murderous mob was with the use of ethos. Ethos, or ethics, uses one’s exceptional characteristics to convince people that one is worth listening to, and tell the truth. Antony used this form of convincing many times in his argument. For one, he said, “But, as you know me all, a plain blunt man.” Antony is trying to make himself look trustworthy and that it would be insensible to doubt him. Antony is showing the crowd that there is no part of him the is sinister or trying to trick them. Moreover, Antony used ethos in the story when he said, “I come to bury Caesar not to praise him” …show more content…

They are used perfectly in the speech, as well as the most often. Foremost, he said, “It will inflame you, it will make you mad: ‘Tis good you know not that you are his heirs.” When the people found out that they were Caesar’s heirs, their emotions for him were plentiful and their love overabundant. They realized they were worthy enough to be thought of by Caesar. Also, Antony said, “This was the most unkindest cut of all;” He was referencing the cut of Brutus, and all of the commoners were heartbroken and enraged after seeing all of the wounds of the man they loved. In Antony’s speech, his use of pathos greatly influenced the commoners, more than any out of the

Open Document